Writer Lauren McLaughlin blogs:
Atlantic has a fantastic article by Hanna Rosin about transgender kids, which I read hungrily in the hope that it would add to my understanding of the topic. Sadly, it confirmed many of my worst fears. Theres a heart-rending story about 8-year-old Brandon who, from the moment he could speak, has insisted he was a girl. His bewildered parents, who live in an area where a boys a boy and a girls a girl, eventually wind up at a transgender conference where they meet kids and parents going through the same kinds of challenges. The article outlines in broad strokes the evolution of attitudes on the subject of gender identity, though Im not sure evolution is the right word. Pendulum seems more appropriate since we seem to swing back and forth between the two following dogmas:
Gender is hard-wired and immune to cultural influence
Gender is entirely cultural with no biological basis
Otherwise known as Nature versus Nurture.
The fact that gender could be a mix of these two things seems not to have entered into the minds of the experts who treat these kids. Notably absent from interviews with them is any awareness of the fact that they may not have at their disposal all the information required to form a comprehensive theory of gender. And since all of the kids (and indeed all of the psychologists, physicians, and researchers who study them) exist within a cultural framework, its nearly impossible to isolate non-cultured traits. In fact, the few twin studies performed on the subject have revealed that, while sexual orientation seems to have a strong biological basis, gender identity does not.
Is there another way? We dont demand rigid conformity to norms in all things. Why gender? The average man is taller than the average woman, but we dont demand that short men take human grown hormone or that tall women have their legs shortened. Is it possible that were demanding too much of these children and not enough from society as a whole? Shouldnt we be better than the mother of Brandons former best friend who rejected him on Christian grounds? Perhaps if it was okay for a boy to wear make up, Brandon wouldnt be faced with the prospect of puberty-blocking hormones. And why shouldnt it be okay for a boy to wear make up? It doesnt hurt anyone.
Utterly absent from this otherwise insightful article was any mention of compassion. Not once did someone suggest that Brandon might be encouraged to love his body as it is and still enjoy playing with dolls. Not once did anyone question the ethics of endorsing rigid gender boundaries despite ample evidence of the pain they cause. Perhaps when faced with a little boy like Brandon, instead of figuring out how to fix him, we should figure out how to fix ourselves.
Right on. I can only add my experience: My son likes to wear dresses once in a while (mainly at birthday parties; he thinks that dresses are more festive) and has shown more interests in ballet and figure skating than sports and hockey, but at no point has he indicated that he wants to be a girl, and he still rough houses and does the whole playing-with-trucks thing. Recently, he's started to show a bit more self-consciousness about gender roles--he actually did not request a dress for our last birthday party--which I'm pretty sure is one outcome of socialization at school. We're not pushing either way. These are his decisions, as far as we're concerned.
The rest of Lauren's entry is well worth a read. She's the author of the young adult novel, Cycler, which is about a girl named Jill who turns into a boy named Jack for four days out of the month. I'll definitely be checking that one out.