or Connect
Mothering › Blog Posts › Voluntary Vaccines in Japan

Voluntary Vaccines in Japan




Peter Doshi, MA, a doctoral candidate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and currently a Visiting Researcher with the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Tokyo, spoke at the National Vaccine Information Center conference on the difference between the childhood vaccine programs in the US and Japan.


Japan, a country of 130 million people with low infant mortality and high life expectancy, has had a completely voluntary vaccination system since 1994. No system exists to check vaccine status in schools in Japan. Recommended vaccines are free and one must pay out of pocket for elective vaccines. Vaccination coverage rates are high, according to Doshi, because the Japanese public has high trust in authority and high expectations for vaccine safety. The Japanese culture values quality control and product excellence.


During the first six months of life, the Japanese child receives only two vaccines: Polio (OPV) and BCG, while the US child receives multiple doses of eight or nine vaccines. During the first year of life, the Japanese child receives 14 doses of vaccines while the US child receives 33 doses. And, in the first two years of life if all recommended vaccines are administered, the Japanese child receives 17 doses of seven vaccines and the US child receives 23 doses of 10 vaccines.


In Japan, generally only one injection is given at a time. Contrast this to the US in which monovalent (single dose) vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella are not even available. According to the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), there is no medical reason to administer the measles, mumps and rubella antigens separately and ACIP guidelines do not support their use. Based on this input and on manufacturing constraints, Merck stopped making these three monovalent vaccines in 2008 despite strong demand from parents.


In Japan, inactivated vaccines are administered six days apart and live vaccines 27 days apart. In contrast, the CDC recommends combining vaccines and states that no time is needed between them.


Japanese health officials take the possibility of vaccine reactions seriously. They ask all parents to fill out a detailed immunization questionnaire and to record any possible vaccine reactions in the Mother-Child Handbook that the government provides. Parents must read the handbook and give consent before their child receives vaccines. They are directed to take their child’s temperature before a vaccination is administered, as Japanese health officials believe that vaccinations may worsen an already sick child. The handbook also asks that parents observe their children’s behavior for 30 minutes following vaccination.


In Japan, vaccinations are not given to children if they have fever or an acute illness or have shown any abnormal symptoms following a previous dose of a vaccine. In contrast, the CDC says, “A mild illness or fever is usually not a reason to delay an immunization.”


What led to the voluntary system in Japan? The Japanese found that mandatory vaccinations did not guarantee compliance and saw adverse events associated with vaccines as a social problem. In 1962 childhood vaccines first became mandatory in Japan and by 1974 Japanese children were required to receive four vaccines. When there were problems with vaccines, the government took action. In 1975, after two successive deaths following the whole cell pertussis vaccine, the vaccine was temporarily suspended. When the vaccine was resumed it was only recommended for those over two years of age and by 1981, a new vaccine, the acellular pertussis vaccine was developed and introduced in Japan. Tragically, the acellular pertussis vaccine was not licensed in the US until 1991.


In 1989, when the MMR vaccine was causing three cases of aseptic meningitis for every 1000 vaccines, the vaccine was taken off the market and reformulated. Subsequent vaccines only included measles and rubella, not mumps. In 1987 the Japanese law was relaxed and the detailed immunization questionnaire for parents was begun. In 1994 mandatory mass vaccines in Japan ended. Perhaps because of the mutual trust inherent in the Japanese system, 2006 showed high rates of vaccine compliance for the first dose: 98% were vaccinated with the DPT vaccine; 97% with polio; 97% with measles, and 100% with rubella.


Peggy O'Mara  (101 Posts)

Peggy O’Mara founded Mothering.com in 1995 and is currently its editor-in chief. She was the editor and publisher of Mothering Magazine from 1980 to 2011. The author of Having a Baby Naturally; Natural Family Living; The Way Back Home; and A Quiet Place, Peggy has lectured and conducted workshops at Omega Institute, Esalen, La Leche League International, and Bioneers. She is the mother of four.

103840910384101038411


Tags: Acellular Pertussis, Japan, MMR, Vaccines, Voluntary Vaccines





Comments (8)

I would like to see references, particularly where the article cites "In 1989, when the MMR vaccine was causing three cases of aseptic meningitis for every 1000 vaccines...".
I can't see any comments to this - maybe I'm the first, but "US child receives 23 doses of 10 vaccines" doesn't make sense, esp considering the sentence before. My calculations are 35 vaxes by/including age 2. But 33 by age 1 is a little aggressive, also, as some of those are 15 month and 18 month shots. I also thought I'd read somewhere that Japan didn't start any vaccinations until age 2.
“Tragically, the acellular pertussis vaccine was not licensed in the US until 1991.” I personally have no issues with a longer evaluation process for vaccines. This article seems contradictory...that the US vaccines aren’t as safe, but then it says we took longer to approve it which is likely due to the stringent controls the FDA and such has....then it says we give too many shots....but critiques US for giving the MMR together instead of separately....It appears to say that the we shouldn’t vaccinate so much, but then the differences in number are small but the system remains. I also would like to see sources as Amy mentioned. I find myself extremely skeptical of uncited statistics and I am extremely skeptical of cited statistics as they can be interpreted to support either side. While I doubt people in Japan are ‘smarter’ than US Citizens, their culture is very community based. I think a voluntary program in the US would backfire and be disastrous. I am personally very pro-vaccination and I find myself with the impression that the many people I have talked with that choose to not vaccinate make that decision based not upon what is good for the community (vaccinations....as the article shows given the response in japan) and instead choose that based upon their own ideas and for their own selves/children’s selves. There is no data to support anyone’s claim that NOT vaccinating is good for the community as a whole....yet again another disparity that is not stated but appears to come from the article. I just doesn’t read well and seems to support everything and nothing at once.
woops, should say "it jsut doesn't read well" not I :)
This is to advise all pregnant mothers that there has been a high incidence of miscarriages from pregnant mothers who have lost their fetus due to the H1N1 Swine Vaccine. If you are pregnant now, and under pressure from your doctor to get vaccinated -there is information you need to know. Firstly the CDC, FDA, or NIH are not keeping statistics on swine vaccine miscarriages, that is the baby dies shortly after the mother gets the vaccine shot. You need to read the cases one by one, and decide if your going to believe another mother who lost her child or a drug company, that you cannot sue, that is not responsible for any damages, that did no testing on their product or care about you at all. Please contact: Eileen Dannerman, Director of National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW) by Phone: 917-804-0786 or go to: http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/. There are also 300 posts on Gardasil damage to young teens, and deaths have been reported after this vaccine. It is now mandatory in 12 states that kids must get this vaccine even without parental consent. Please tell every mom, or pregnant mom to be about this-you will not get it on TV networks or the newspaper. .-= P. Neisman´s last blog ..Canada Olympics 2010 Opening Ceremony =-.
Three Cheers for the Japanese! A respectful reply to RL's comment: Are you not the least bit curious how this has turned out for the Japanese, who I regard as quite intelligent. You imply that people who are not vaccinated create risk in the community. Viruses can be carried by anyone whether they are vaccinated or not. It is unkind to suggest we are not community minded, quite the opposite! Equally, there is no data to support that vaccinating is GOOD either. A voluntary program in the U.S. would be wonderful. It would provide access to vaccinations for those who wanted them and would lift pressure from those of us who dislike them. I believe in 'some' vaccines, but I refuse to allow anyone to force Gardasal or Swine Flu vaccine on my daughter. Good article - I understood that Peter Doshi, MA, was the source and therefore figure he did his homework. Still, I agree, it would be nice to see sources.
We just returned to the US after 4 years of living in Japan, and so I know firsthand what vaccines are required there. Vaccines (for polio and DTP) start during infancy, but not at birth or in the first few months, and they are very meticulous about recording reactions (mothers are asked to take their children's temperature a few times after each vaccine). I was, however, quite hounded by the local medical government board when my baby had reached 6-7 months and had not yet started any vaccines. (They knew this because they keep records on every child who is vaccinated). .-= Christine ´s last blog ..Sweet Korean pancakes =-.
http://www.vaclib.org/basic/japanusa.htm Here's a good reference.
Mothering › Blog Posts › Voluntary Vaccines in Japan