No. I don't think they should.
Actually, I think all insurance companies should take a flying leap off the closest bridge and we should go to a single-payer system.
I doubt I'll see it in my lifetime, though.
Interesting in how awful it is. For example, she says: According to the CDC 1983 schedule (here: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/images/schedule1983s.jpg) , there were 22 on the schedule before age 6. 22 times that is 484, not 49. An increase of 2286% of 22 is 524.92. Math fail. The rest of her "facts" are just as inaccurate.
EThat's not quite what the article says. It says that these are slated to be targets of research into environmental causes is autism, not that they ARE causes. It also says that the estimate is the 3% of cases are causes by environmental factors. That leaves 97% caused by something else.
This is reporting on a ban from 2010. Why is it being "reported" as though it is breaking news?
Odd, no mention in the article about the ban being lifted after there was no evidence found of an increased incidence of adverse effects.
If you only want to talk to one person, you should probably use a PM. This is a forum. Oh, wait, you were talking to Rachel, not me.
Or are all three screen names mine?????
The world will never know....mwah ha ha!!!!
Interesting. I'm wondering, Chicha, have you personally reviewed her son's medical records? If not, why not? I mean, if the McCaffery's have to release their daughter's private information in order to be believed by you, shouldn't Barbara Loe Fischer, also?
Regarding whether or not the AVN is anti-vaccine, in Meryl Dorey's own words: Also from the same article- she actually harassed the parents of an infant who died of pertussis, claiming that the baby died of something else. http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2010/s2951651.htm