Posts by Rrrrrachel

When did I say it was a scientific study? That would be a weird scientific study.

Then why are you acting so confused about parents who've said their experiences didn't match the account in the research study?   http://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.c5347

I'm sure the uk general medical council just read the article and revoked wakefields license, no questions asked.

Have you actually read the Brian deer article? Either of you?

He DID lie about when at least some of the children's autism symptoms started. The parents have come forward and said so. And he DID have, at best, mixed motivations. He was being paid to achieve a particular outcome.

You can't statistically prove there is no link. All you can do is say you didn't find one. That's the strongest statement an epidemiological study can make. Anyone who's telling you different is misleading you.

Huh?

It still doesn't rise to the level of scientific evidence. Those rulings are also being misrepresented.

My point is exactly what I said. Maternal antibodies don't last until five.

No. I'm not saying that.