I'm now stuck with a lot of questions about how realistic this all was. ...here's some more spoiler space so I don't give anything away with mouse-overs...
Don't anti-abportion protesters generally work in groups, rather than one person with one sign in the parking lot outside a clinic? And do clinic employees generally act THAT unprofessionally?
Are there actually adoption ads in the Pennysaver?
Do birth moms REALLY only interview one couple? Somehow I had the image in my head that women would interview 2 or 3 couples, and if one split up she'd likely select another couple rather than placing her baby with a single mom?
Why was the biodad so uninvolved? Don't they need his permission (and that of hiis parents, if he's underage) to finalize the adoption?
Don't anti-abportion protesters generally work in groups, rather than one person with one sign in the parking lot outside a clinic? And do clinic employees generally act THAT unprofessionally?
Are there actually adoption ads in the Pennysaver?
Do birth moms REALLY only interview one couple? Somehow I had the image in my head that women would interview 2 or 3 couples, and if one split up she'd likely select another couple rather than placing her baby with a single mom?
Why was the biodad so uninvolved? Don't they need his permission (and that of hiis parents, if he's underage) to finalize the adoption?









). Jennifer Garner did an excellent job playing a woman who is desperate for a child and is striving so hard to make herself the best candidate for a potential birth mother. Despite all the problems with reality in the movie, I don't think it's so far off the have a teenager hand her child off to a single mother. Jennifer Garner's character would have probably been an excellent mother either married or single, and the same extends to real-life situations. Some single parents provide great stable, loving environments for adoptive children. Out of all the outcomes in the movie, I really liked that one the best.

