or Connect
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Mom › Parenting › Help! I Just Found Out That My Friend Locks Her Toddlers In Their Rooms At Night And For Naps!!!!!!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Help! I Just Found Out That My Friend Locks Her Toddlers In Their Rooms At Night And For Naps!!!!!! - Page 10

post #181 of 236
Quote:
Exactly.

I have to wonder what CPS would think about people buying an adult-sized fetish-crib to make their preschooler sleep in, though.
Yea.

:scary.
post #182 of 236
You know, I promise, I am not in a bad mood(though cat clawing me to death while i t y pe doesnt help), but it really gets my goat how people throw the word abuse around like a piece of yesterdays bread.

Parents have hard enough jobs without worrying about being judged "abusive" at every twist and turn by the public eye. Having a bad day, going shopping with your 4 kids and scream at them, maybe this is the third time you have ever screamed in 8 years but someone sees you and deems you the A word(not ass) before you can say martha stewart...

It makes me so frustrated. I know the REAL abuse that exists, and there isnt even a fine line.
post #183 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1littlebit View Post
it seems to me that everyone on this thread who locks their child in their room does so in order to be a good parent and meet the needs of your child.

the difference is appears to be pretty obvious.
True - we got a bit off-topic... And while I jumped in to defend locking doors in certain situations, actually I totally disagree with the OP's friends tactics. Didn't mean to imply that I thought it was okay. Just saw so many comments saying that basically anything but cosleeping is baby torture, and that made me defensive.

About it being illegal - is that actually true? I poked around a bit on the internet and have found conflicting information. There seem to have been some cases against parents, but those were instances in which they were literally padlocking teenagers in their room as punishment, not sleep-training a toddler or containing a sleepwalker.
post #184 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by cotopaxi View Post
There seem to have been some cases against parents, but those were instances in which they were literally padlocking teenagers in their room as punishment, not sleep-training a toddler or containing a sleepwalker.
padlocking their teenagers into their rooms? some people are nuts. completely nuts.
post #185 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1littlebit View Post
padlocking their teenagers into their rooms? some people are nuts. completely nuts.
Some of those "Wayward Youth Christian Rehab" programs from the 80's and 90's used to have that as part of the protocol.
Scary stuff.
post #186 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by mamakay View Post
Some of those "Wayward Youth Christian Rehab" programs from the 80's and 90's used to have that as part of the protocol.
Scary stuff.
yeah they are.. it wasnt just the christian ones either! we covered them in my juvenile justice class... in the 'oops bad idea' chapter. there is a good book out now.. its fiction but its reality based.. about being in one of those.. scary crazy stuff.. a lot of the kids came out wayyy more screwed up then when they started.
post #187 of 236
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by loitering View Post
That is hilarious "I've never seen anything like this, where did you get it?"

"Oh, just babyapparels.com, the best site for Adult Baby Furniture on the web!"


Can I please ask you to think carefully before you to think carefully before you mock things you don't understand? I think that is fair. i understand why you do it because it is strange. But allow me to explain, please...

I really want to be sincere in saying this, and I'm not putting you down in any way, but I'd really like to help you understand. Adult babies are not the only people who purchase these cribs. I learned about the site being involved in the special needs community. Institutions and schools also purchase cribs from here. I never heard about these cribs or even knew that they existed until I was set away to my special needs residential school and was exposed to all types of special needs up close and personal.

I went to a residential school where all types of special needs children went, and this was my portle to understanding the world of the mentally challenged and how to deal with them. I'd only heard about them before but never been up close and personal. Being at that school taught me so much. It taught me how sheltered I really was. If it weren't for being there, I'd never have had the compassion or insight that I do, nor would I have known anything about this stuff. My eyes would not have been opened, and I woudl not have known any creative ways of doing things. I have the knowledge that I do because of those experiences. I'm thankful for them and would not trade them for the world. But when I was sent away, I saw it up close and personal every day. It was frightening at first, and like you, I made a mockery of things I did not understand, which is why I'm not at all upset with you because I did it, too. Looking back, I feel bad, but I then came to my senses once I understood.

In my late teens, I began caring for the mentally challenged for community service hours. The school allowed me. Then, I helped out friends with mentally challenged relatives, and I cared for them out of the goodness of my heart. I still do it from time to time. I help with them so their families ca get a break and won't get worn out and end up putting them in an institution, which is the worse thing to do. (i've seen so many things happen in those places that I have nightmares. I learned about it through my exposure to the mentally challenged. I also had to report bad staff members for doing horrible things to those students. My school was considered to be an institution. It was under that category. I can't speak of some of the things I saw staff do, but if I' not mistaken, I did talk about some things on my blog.) I love what I do so much that I started a blog about caring for loved one and keeping them home. It is found at www.keepthemhome.blogspot.com It is interesting if you'd like to read it. Should you decide to read it, I hope you find it interesting. Take care of yourself.
post #188 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1littlebit View Post
yeah they are.. it wasnt just the christian ones either! we covered them in my juvenile justice class... in the 'oops bad idea' chapter. there is a good book out now.. its fiction but its reality based.. about being in one of those.. scary crazy stuff.. a lot of the kids came out wayyy more screwed up then when they started.
Yeah, I knew some kids who got sent to one around here after being caught smoking cigarettes and other fairly "not totally out of control" stuff like that, and they're all either addicted to meth or dead from heroin now.

Those places were marketed so well as the be-all-end-all answer, too. Like, if you love your kid, you'll send them here and trust us.
post #189 of 236
Deer Hunter- i'm confused about that. maybe its different everywhere but i have worked in an institution .. more then one actually. we did not have adult cribs. we would never have had adult cribs. putting adults in cribs would have been a degrading and humiliating experience for most if not all of our patients and that was the exact opposite of what we wanted to achieve. and yes we had people who were severely severely disabled.
post #190 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deer Hunter View Post
Can I please ask you to think carefully before you to think carefully before you mock things you don't understand? I think that is fair. i understand why you do it because it is strange. But allow me to explain, please...

I really want to be sincere in saying this, and I'm not putting you down in any way, but I'd really like to help you understand. Adult babies are not the only people who purchase these cribs. I learned about the site being involved in the special needs community. Institutions and schools also purchase cribs from here. I never heard about these cribs or even knew that they existed until I was set away to my special needs residential school and was exposed to all types of special needs up close and personal.

I went to a residential school where all types of special needs children went, and this was my portle to understanding the world of the mentally challenged and how to deal with them. I'd only heard about them before but never been up close and personal. Being at that school taught me so much. It taught me how sheltered I really was. If it weren't for being there, I'd never have had the compassion or insight that I do, nor would I have known anything about this stuff. My eyes would not have been opened, and I woudl not have known any creative ways of doing things. I have the knowledge that I do because of those experiences. I'm thankful for them and would not trade them for the world. But when I was sent away, I saw it up close and personal every day. It was frightening at first, and like you, I made a mockery of things I did not understand, which is why I'm not at all upset with you because I did it, too. Looking back, I feel bad, but I then came to my senses once I understood.

In my late teens, I began caring for the mentally challenged for community service hours. The school allowed me. Then, I helped out friends with mentally challenged relatives, and I cared for them out of the goodness of my heart. I still do it from time to time. I help with them so their families ca get a break and won't get worn out and end up putting them in an institution, which is the worse thing to do. (i've seen so many things happen in those places that I have nightmares. I learned about it through my exposure to the mentally challenged. I also had to report bad staff members for doing horrible things to those students. My school was considered to be an institution. It was under that category. I can't speak of some of the things I saw staff do, but if I' not mistaken, I did talk about some things on my blog.) I love what I do so much that I started a blog about caring for loved one and keeping them home. It is found at www.keepthemhome.blogspot.com It is interesting if you'd like to read it. Should you decide to read it, I hope you find it interesting. Take care of yourself.
Thanks for point this out. I've worked in home health care- and I've seen adults in cribs. Sometimes it is the most comfortable thing for them, and I don't really understand why that is funny.
post #191 of 236
Quote:
Thanks for point this out. I've worked in home health care- and I've seen adults in cribs. Sometimes it is the most comfortable thing for them, and I don't really understand why that is funny
It's not.
What's funny is the idea of putting a normal preschooler in an adult crib made for adult baby fetishists in order to not be "abusive" by CPS standards by locking the door.
post #192 of 236
I read all 10 pages. whew.

IMHO, the issue in the OP is not the locked door. the issue is the CIO. A locked door, just like a crib, playpen, stroller, or carseat is a child containment device that can be a lifesaving, protective tool or an instrument of neglect and bad parenting. It is all down to how it is used.

Also, "locked door" conjures up images of padlocks and chains, but no one posting on this thread has used the term in that way. When we moved my oldest to his own room, he didn't have the manual dexterity to open his bedroom door. He slept on a mattress on the floor and we kept the door closed while he slept. To me this "counts" as a locked door, equally to a door gate, latch, or child door handle cover - or a crib, playpen, etc etc - i.e. the child is unable to leave a specific safe space without direct adult supervision.

In the scenario that I think most posters are telling, adults (and older children) can open the door/enter the room as needed to attend to the child's needs. The only person prevented from opening the door is the child in question - presumably because the child must be supervised by an adult whenever leaving the room.

Again, I think the issue is not the locked door, but entirely the use of the locked door. The OP's friend is using the bedrooms as essentially toddler-sized cribs to CIO. And that is deeply problematic, of course.

My 2 cents.
post #193 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by siobhang View Post
I read all 10 pages. whew.

IMHO, the issue in the OP is not the locked door. the issue is the CIO. A locked door, just like a crib, playpen, stroller, or carseat is a child containment device that can be a lifesaving, protective tool or an instrument of neglect and bad parenting. It is all down to how it is used.

Also, "locked door" conjures up images of padlocks and chains, but no one posting on this thread has used the term in that way. When we moved my oldest to his own room, he didn't have the manual dexterity to open his bedroom door. He slept on a mattress on the floor and we kept the door closed while he slept. To me this "counts" as a locked door, equally to a door gate, latch, or child door handle cover - or a crib, playpen, etc etc - i.e. the child is unable to leave a specific safe space without direct adult supervision.

In the scenario that I think most posters are telling, adults (and older children) can open the door/enter the room as needed to attend to the child's needs. The only person prevented from opening the door is the child in question - presumably because the child must be supervised by an adult whenever leaving the room.

Again, I think the issue is not the locked door, but entirely the use of the locked door. The OP's friend is using the bedrooms as essentially toddler-sized cribs to CIO. And that is deeply problematic, of course.

My 2 cents.
Yep.
Just like, you can use a crib and not do CIO (and that might even be "the best thing" for some babies/toddlers) a locked (unopenable to the kid) door might be the best option for some.

Ignoring the baby or child's needs is the thing that's wrong in any situation. I'll not go so far as to call CIO "abuse", but I do think it's definitely "wrong" as a general rule according to my own (and our collective) moral/parenting standards.
post #194 of 236
I just noticed this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deer Hunter
What if they got sick? She said that they would be okay and that she'd come ot them if they cried in the night. But to me, i is not okay. NOt in the least bit!
So it's not like the OP's friend is being unusually terrible.
post #195 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by mamakay View Post
Yep.
Ignoring the baby or child's needs is the thing that's wrong in any situation. I'll not go so far as to call CIO "abuse", but I do think it's definitely "wrong" as a general rule according to my own (and our collective) moral/parenting standards.
I totally agree. While I don't CIO and wish that no one else would either, I don't understand the urging to call CPS in these instances. To report something that is (1) legal, (2) well within the range of normal parenting in this country, and (3) quite possibly recommended by the child's doctor seems like a poor use of the system. (the advice in the link is similar to what my ped gives out, and is very typical of ped advice here locally - I just ignore it of course!).

I think in these instances when a friend is doing something you find objectionable but is not actually illegal, or unusual, or against standard medical advice, you have to decide: is this so bad imo that I can no longer be friends with this person? If so, that's your perogative. I can think of a number of parenting issues that would cause me to end a friendship. CIO isn't one of them for me, but if it is for you, that's certainly your perogative.

Otherwise, if you decide to remain friends, I see the best option as leading by example. Threatening to call CPS (or actually calling), or other aggressive behavior will not get your point across. I would not remain friends with someone who say, threatened to call CPS because I am continuing to breastfeed my 18-month-old, and the threat would do nothing to change my mind about the benefits of full-term breastfeeding. I'm sure people will say "but that's not the same" - yet, I'm absolutely SURE that many of my friends not only have chosen to wean earlier or not BF at all b/c they didn't feel it was right for them - but also feel that I'm harming my child psychologically by BF at this age. We can continue our friendship because we keep our opinions about what the other is doing wrong to ourselves. They all know that I don't CIO, and that my child is a great, great sleeper - better than most of theirs, actually. Hopefully this has planted the seed in their minds that there is another alternative, and maybe they'll make a different decision with future kids. Certainly if they ever decide to explore other options they know I'm here to help.
post #196 of 236
Hi! I have removed several posts that were in violation of the UA, or that quoted or responded to UAV's. Please realize that further User Agreement violations will result in the thread's permanent removal or closure. In an effort to keep the thread accessible, please be cautious when you post and PM me or co-Mod with any questions or concerns.


When posting to this thread (and all threads) please keep the MDC User Agreement in mind.
post #197 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deer Hunter View Post
I like the gate idea and keeping all the doors open. I'd do this so long as my children were okay with sleeping without me. That is an idea.
Maybe suggest this to your friend.
post #198 of 236
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1littlebit View Post
Deer Hunter- i'm confused about that. maybe its different everywhere but i have worked in an institution .. more then one actually. we did not have adult cribs. we would never have had adult cribs. putting adults in cribs would have been a degrading and humiliating experience for most if not all of our patients and that was the exact opposite of what we wanted to achieve. and yes we had people who were severely severely disabled.



Yes, it is definitely different everywhere. There are places where I've personally seen them tie their patients up, which is a practice I deffinitely abhor and think is inhumane. So, to answer your qestions, I've seen so many different things done, and some really broke my heart.
post #199 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deer Hunter View Post
Yes, it is definitely different everywhere. There are places where I've personally seen them tie their patients up, which is a practice I deffinitely abhor and think is inhumane. So, to answer your qestions, I've seen so many different things done, and some really broke my heart.
it's also illegal and no reputable facility would tie their patients up. if it were necessary for their protection they have restraint systems
post #200 of 236
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1littlebit View Post
it's also illegal and no reputable facility would tie their patients up. if it were necessary for their protection they have restraint systems


Yes, and it would trouble me greatly when people suggested doing it as a solution to keep them from wondering. I'd ask them, "How would you like that done to you? It isn't comfortable, nor is it nice. That person has feelings just as you do, and you have no reason to treat them like that." This is the reason I addressed humane ways in keeping a mentally challenged loved one safe. Cribs are actually popular from my experiences, and I'm not the only one who has seen the method done that way. What techniques did they use where you worked?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Parenting
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Mom › Parenting › Help! I Just Found Out That My Friend Locks Her Toddlers In Their Rooms At Night And For Naps!!!!!!