Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › Is this really normal in the US? No circ-ing in Europe...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Is this really normal in the US? No circ-ing in Europe...  

post #1 of 73
Thread Starter 
Hi, I'm from the UK and I just can't get my head around routine circumcision - it seems completely odd to me. In the UK the only boys that are circ-ed are those that are for religious reasons. I have had plenty of partners, and only seen one circumcised penis in my life. And that was wierd. Sex is way harder than if the foreskin is there! That was a US guy by the way.

I am just shocked that this goes on in a routine way to be honest, and I don't really understand the justification for it.

It is the same in the rest of Europe as well. It just seems like a really barbaric and horrific practice to me.
post #2 of 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilabet View Post
Hi, I'm from the UK and I just can't get my head around routine circumcision - it seems completely odd to me. In the UK the only boys that are circ-ed are those that are for religious reasons. I have had plenty of partners, and only seen one circumcised penis in my life. And that was wierd. Sex is way harder than if the foreskin is there! That was a US guy by the way.

I am just shocked that this goes on in a routine way to be honest, and I don't really understand the justification for it.

It is the same in the rest of Europe as well. It just seems like a really barbaric and horrific practice to me.
Lamentably it is still relatively common. There is something about circumcision that prevents parents from really thinking hard about it, once it's normalized to them anyway. In fact, until people started getting onto the Internet and such it was so common that many thought all boy/men everywhere had to be circumcised. Doctors here don't help the situation, thought they should know better. Fortunately, it is on a slow decline but there are many who still think intact boys and men can't keep themselves clean or will be disease prone it's even difficult to wrap your head around that attitude when you live here.
post #3 of 73
Yes, it is still routine here (numbers are dropping though). It is barbaric, disturbing and just plain wrong. It's hard for me to understand it and I was raised with it being the norm.
post #4 of 73
Unfortunately, yes

Far too many people here consider being circumcised as "normal" instead of the other way around. Other than religious purposes, baby boys are routinely circumcised within a day or so after birth because so many people here are convinced that the foreskin is this unhygenic, smelly, unattractive, illness and disease causing "flap of skin" or "extra hanging skin" that is just waiting to make the baby's penis fall off at any given moment. Ok, perhaps that last part was exaggerating a tiny bit, but yes, they are convinced that leaving an infant boy intact is basically nothing but trouble. They are also convinced that if it isn't done as an infant, that the majority of all males will HAVE to be circumcised later on in life - which is simply untrue.

Aside from faulty medical reasons, there's the, "well dad is circumcised and the son MUST look like his dad" argument.. which is obviously rediculous. And "the boys in the locker room will laugh at him!".
And many other equally rediculous claims.

You are right.. it's most definitely odd, barbaric, and utterly horrific

It is changing, though... slowly.
post #5 of 73
I'm 28. Until 6 months ago I had never seen an intact penis. I thought it was necessary!

And we didn't circ, btw. Most people have thought nothing of it.
post #6 of 73
For some reason, there are these bizarre myths that keep circulating in the US. I dont get it. what every one told me when I had DS (including my then 18 year old SIL....)
-It doesn't hurt them
-They won't remember it
-It's jsut a useless piece of skin
-If you don't do it, it's really hard to clean

We left DS intact because
-Don't tell me cutting off the end of someone's penis doesn't hurt without geneal anesthesia
- Subconsciously, they most certainly DO remember it
-It's NOT useless, its a very IMPORTANT part of the anatomy
-WTF, this is the easiest thing to clean on his entire body!

I do not understand why these myths keep perpetuating. It makes no sense to me. All it took was like three minutes of reading the function of the foreskin for me to go "No WAY are we taking that from our son." Since he is cut, DH was a harder sell. He figured his sex life was fine, no big deal. Even for my rather hard nosed partner, it was just a few minutes of reading and he was as horrified by this as I was. So I just don't get how people could see the information and still choose to do that to their sons. I pray for a day when RIC is legally considered child abuse, because that's exactly what it is.
post #7 of 73
Lilabet, I'm in Canada where it's not routine either.

I just can't get my head around why it is in the US. It makes no sense to me.
post #8 of 73
I'm in the UK and I had the same reaction as you, Lilabet.

I have tried pointing this out to pro circers on the internet, the fact that we don't circ here and it doesn't seem like our men have diseased penises about to drop off lol I think many of them are of the opinion that we are somehow backwards and ignorant of the "benefits" which is why we don't do it....
post #9 of 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilabet View Post
Hi, I'm from the UK and I just can't get my head around routine circumcision - it seems completely odd to me. In the UK the only boys that are circ-ed are those that are for religious reasons. I have had plenty of partners, and only seen one circumcised penis in my life. And that was wierd. Sex is way harder than if the foreskin is there! That was a US guy by the way.

I am just shocked that this goes on in a routine way to be honest, and I don't really understand the justification for it.

It is the same in the rest of Europe as well. It just seems like a really barbaric and horrific practice to me.
It seems barbaric and horrific to me, too, But just as you don't seem to feel horrified by the fact that it is done for religious reasons, I guess because it is the 'usual' here, most people don't think about it much.

However, there are so many myths about the foreskin that those that are from intact norm countries can really help to dispell the myths and make intactness the norm here too.

Jessica
post #10 of 73
oh, i wanted to add, that for me, learnng that most of the world does not circumcise was a HUGE reason why I fought pretty hard to keep my son intact. It just really didn't make sense why we would do something that was painful and possbly dangerous (now I know its also damagng) to a newborn when most of the world was just fine (and there was no medical reason for it).

nak

Jessica
post #11 of 73
With each of my 3 kids one of the huge stack of papers given to me when I was being admitted to the hospital in active labor was the circ consent form. (Actually not for the 2nd one, I walked in crowning and she was already born by the time we got around to the paperwork...) The circ consent form is thrown in with the other papers like the permission to bill your insurance or whatnot. It's THAT routine. Unfortunately we did make the decision to circ our son. He's now 21 mos and I do truly regret that we did it. My husband was very insistent for religious reasons. If we have another boy I refuse to have it done. Period. He can divorce me over it for all I care. I truly wish I'd read up on it more before having my son.

When I say this to friends or other moms in our playgroup they seem horrified that I would NOT circ the next boy. It does seem like I'm an outsider for even considering it. Not in the LLL group though, there are quite a few crunchy moms there with intact boys.

So, to answer your question, OP, it's a "normal" part of the hospital birth here. Just like having your BP monitored and being told not to eat or drink anything but clear liquids while you're in labor. (Which I totally ignored every time because how can you have the energy required to give birth if you've been sipping Sprite?) My OB came around to check on all her patients that morning and told me she'd be doing circs around noon (after doing a c-section first). My DH accompanied our son and held him during the procedure. He told me that they literally had 5 baby boys all lined up in a row... the nurse removed the diaper, the OB did the circ... nurse cleaned up a bit and bandaged him, put on a new diaper... move on to next baby. It was an assembly line for circs. (The very thought makes me sick to my stomach thinking about it. Sorry to those of you with weak stomachs.) The OB was also VERY surprised that DH came with him. Our rule is that baby does NOT leave us at the hospital. One of us goes with the baby everywhere, nighttime weight checks and all.

Beth
post #12 of 73
Thread Starter 
I do find religious circ-ing equally as bad, but it's difficult (more difficult anyway) to ever get people to change if they do something as part of their religion. I guess it is that routine circ-ing had not even ever crossed my mind as a possibility until I read this board really.

I can't comprehend really actually how it is legal. Do you think this will ever change?

Beth, that description is grim. Routine mutilation. NICE. I can see why you want to stay with your baby if this is the kind of stuff you have to protect them from.

Claire - funny you should say you think that people pro-circ might think we are backward, when I thought, upon reading about this, that the pro-circers are the backward ones!
post #13 of 73
I think this is treading too far into discussing religion/circ which is not allowed in this forum.... I just mentioned that as an analogy as to why people in the US seem to 'accept' it so easily, as it seems most intact-norm countries alow/accept religious circumcision.

It is odd that FGM is illegal and male circumcision is legal and that probably won't change here, but I see it gradually becoming only a tradition that is done for religious reasons.

Jessica
post #14 of 73

First Child

We had our first midwife appointment a few weeks and were utterly shocked to hear that circumcision is an elective...and that most insurance companies don't cover it...and it was just like cosmetic surgery.

Why would they be born with the skin if they didn't need it?????

Randi
post #15 of 73
Yep... Its completely routine. At the end of one of my OB appointments (I was in my second tri, not exactly sure how far along), my OB asked me if we wanted to circ if it was a boy. Very surprisingly though, no one asked us at all during our 5 days in the hospital. That's pretty non-typical for most US hospitals, from what I hear.

AFAIK, every little boy I know besides my DS and my nephew are circ'd. The ONLY other mom I know of that had intended to leave her sons intact wound up having a little boy with hypospadias and chordy... So when he was 18mo he had surgery to correct it and of course they used his foreskin for the surgery.
post #16 of 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilabet View Post

Claire - funny you should say you think that people pro-circ might think we are backward, when I thought, upon reading about this, that the pro-circers are the backward ones!
Oh, I completely agree! I did actually read that on a pro circ website once... that they view us as being backward because we don't circ.."ignorant" was the word used even. :

The thing is apparently we used to circ in the UK as well but I think it fell out of favour after a medical paper was released that stated there was no medical benefit. That and the fact that our NHS does not cover it.

I AM thankful that I do not have to worry about taking my sons to the Dr here as we don't get the whole retraction issue that so many ladies on these boards do.
post #17 of 73
yup, it's completely normal... I have only ever seen 2 intact penises irl.
post #18 of 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by talk de jour View Post
yup, it's completely normal... I have only ever seen 2 intact penises irl.
Me too. And they are babies -- my son and my nephew.
post #19 of 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by urchin_grey View Post
Me too. And they are babies -- my son and my nephew.
These were both adult men...

but one of 'em was born on a commune in California. And named Zen.
post #20 of 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by talk de jour View Post
yup, it's completely normal... I have only ever seen 2 intact penises irl.
I'd say its common but certainly not normal.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Case Against Circumcision
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › Is this really normal in the US? No circ-ing in Europe...