Mods, if this is in the wrong place, please move it to wherever you see fit. Thanks so much.
We all here really hate CIO. I hate it so much that it would make me become enraged at the unnecessary trauma that parents were causing to their infants. It woudl also hurt me that they were creating insecure individals since they were forced to be independent before they were ready, which could cause disasterous results, as we all here know. Not ot mention, sleep training is so unpleasant, as baby is left to scream itself into a fatigue-ridden, exhausted sleep, which is anything but pleasant, until they just do not bother to cry anymore. All along, parents blissfully believe that their bundle of joy is sleeping in pure peace since after training.
Because becoming enraged will only lose the message I'm trying to convey, I've thought of a very constructive approach. I'm now writing a paper packed with evidence as to why sleep training is not in the baby's best interest and why it is important to soothe your child until he is ready. The title is, "The Case Against Crying it Out and Sleep Training." When it is finished, I'm posting it all over the net. It will be on every content site I can think of, and I'll even try to get it into Parent magazine. I'm determined to be an AP advocate. Being such really offsets my rage because I know I have a mission. That mission can only be accomplished when calm.
In this paper, I write about the following:
1. How God created the mother and the baby and the relationship between them.
2. What proponents of CIO say and why they justify the practice.
3. What happens to the mother and baby when CIO and sleep training are used.
4. What happens when a mother ignores her child's cries for what she thinks is for his best interest.
5. The Bible's viewpoint on this issue. (Some of you may not be religious, but that is totally okay. I still woudl love your feedback, too. It doesn't matter a person's religious background. Everyone who wants to is more than welcomed to offer feedback.)
6. What leading psychologists say about the practice. (This is against CIO by the way and telling parents why they should not do it.)
7. Then the paper will cause parents to look at the common sense side of things.
If there is anything I should add that you all think is a good idea, please let me know. It is half finished, and when it is done, I'll give all of you a copy to use as a sort of pamphlet to advocate against the method. This will be my gift to you for your help. Just please, remember to give me the credit for the paper.
I look forward to seeing what some of you will say and the good ideas you can throw my way. Thanks so much in advanced for your time.
And mods, I hope that this post does not violate the TOS in any way. If it does for any reason, please contact me to fix the problem.
Take care, all of you.
We all here really hate CIO. I hate it so much that it would make me become enraged at the unnecessary trauma that parents were causing to their infants. It woudl also hurt me that they were creating insecure individals since they were forced to be independent before they were ready, which could cause disasterous results, as we all here know. Not ot mention, sleep training is so unpleasant, as baby is left to scream itself into a fatigue-ridden, exhausted sleep, which is anything but pleasant, until they just do not bother to cry anymore. All along, parents blissfully believe that their bundle of joy is sleeping in pure peace since after training.
Because becoming enraged will only lose the message I'm trying to convey, I've thought of a very constructive approach. I'm now writing a paper packed with evidence as to why sleep training is not in the baby's best interest and why it is important to soothe your child until he is ready. The title is, "The Case Against Crying it Out and Sleep Training." When it is finished, I'm posting it all over the net. It will be on every content site I can think of, and I'll even try to get it into Parent magazine. I'm determined to be an AP advocate. Being such really offsets my rage because I know I have a mission. That mission can only be accomplished when calm.
In this paper, I write about the following:
1. How God created the mother and the baby and the relationship between them.
2. What proponents of CIO say and why they justify the practice.
3. What happens to the mother and baby when CIO and sleep training are used.
4. What happens when a mother ignores her child's cries for what she thinks is for his best interest.
5. The Bible's viewpoint on this issue. (Some of you may not be religious, but that is totally okay. I still woudl love your feedback, too. It doesn't matter a person's religious background. Everyone who wants to is more than welcomed to offer feedback.)
6. What leading psychologists say about the practice. (This is against CIO by the way and telling parents why they should not do it.)
7. Then the paper will cause parents to look at the common sense side of things.
If there is anything I should add that you all think is a good idea, please let me know. It is half finished, and when it is done, I'll give all of you a copy to use as a sort of pamphlet to advocate against the method. This will be my gift to you for your help. Just please, remember to give me the credit for the paper.
I look forward to seeing what some of you will say and the good ideas you can throw my way. Thanks so much in advanced for your time.
And mods, I hope that this post does not violate the TOS in any way. If it does for any reason, please contact me to fix the problem.
Take care, all of you.








: