Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickarolaberry 
The Book of J is a very controversial example of the school of Biblical Criticism. It can't be assumed to be 'historical fact' in any sense of the word at all -- it is an academic theory.
If you're born Jewish, I suppose you can take on whatever 'beliefs' you want about where Torah comes from.
But I must say I don't really get it -- if you feel compelled/called/drawn to convert to Judaism, but reject the Torah, what exactly is it you are converting to? The reason it is not so easy to convert to "Orthodox Judaism" (which was the only Judaism until the 1800's) is that the Torah and the mitzvos give to us by G-d that are in the Torah is binding and obligatory for all Jews. But only for Jews. Non-Jews who like certain teachings of the Torah, or are dedicated to the worship of One G-d without an intercessor, or are moved by the powerful message of morality and ethics demonstrated in the Torah, can all of course believe and do as they wish.
But why take on the name and mitzvos of Judaism when one rejects the premise that the Torah is Divine and that its mitzvos are binding?
I'm not trying to be snarky; I simply don't understand this.
If you don't want to do the mitzva of bris milah for your sons, then why take on a spiritual path of which this is an integral and obligatory part? Same goes for any other mitzva, by the way -- kashrus, keeping Shabbos, keeping the laws of family purity, keeping shatnez, observing holidays in certain ways -- I mean, all of these mitzvos are equally binding, whether or not they 'resonate' or are 'relevant' on a daily basis. If you are a born Jew and decide not to practice, well, everyone has free choice and makes their own decisions.
But why opt into a religion and then reject its basic premise? I don't really understand this. 
|
I absolutely agree with you on the Book of J. It's interesting, but it's not a source of truth. And to be honest, it doesn't matter whether he did, by some random chance, stumble on something that is 100% true. I am not converting to some parallel-universe Judaism where the Torah was written differently or "unadulterated". I am converting in this world. And there's something of value in 4000 years of tradition, regardless of your position on who wrote the Torah.
I've got a problem with the rest of your post, though, because it plays into the totally common and yet totally WRONG perception that converts have to meet a higher bar than any other kind of Jew. Which is, let's face it, pretty contrary to what we're taught in the Torah about how we should treat converts.
First, there is no Jewish person on earth who always obeys all of the Mitzvot. It's not even possible -- and even among the Mitzvot that are possible to observe, not one person always observes them all perfectly, no matter what type of Jew they are.
Second, among Jews by birth there is a whole spectrum of observance -- both in how many Mitzvot they observe and which they observe. Even more important, all Jews (and even all people) move into different ways and levels of practice as they grow and change. Why should either of those things be different for Converts? Why can't we grow and change in our faith like everyone else?
Thirdly, there is a 4000 year old tradition of struggling with parts of the Jewish text and tradition; with studying and reading and thinking and searching ourselves to find out what it is that God wants from us. What kind of Jew would I be setting myself up to be -- or would you be setting all converts up to be -- if we had to be perfectly sure of everything, perfectly comfortable and perfectly observant from the moment we poked our heads out of the Mikvah?
I'm not sure what I will do in a situation where Brit Milah becomes an actual decision rather than a theological debate. I'm not sure that I'll ever be in a position where I keep perfect kosher or that I'll ever not hand things directly to my (non-Jewish) husband when I'm on the rag. I'm open to growing into all of those things. But I do know that there is always going to be someone with your point of view who thinks that I'm not Jewish enough because I don't do X and they think X is definitive.