Mothering › Forums › Natural Family Living › Spirituality › Religious Studies › Anyone Jewish-By-Choice?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Anyone Jewish-By-Choice? - Page 2

post #21 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by RainRaven View Post
Thank you, this was very informative. I feel the same way if God did not want my son to have foreskin then he would be born without it.
The whole point of a bris is because G-d wanted us to remove it ourselves.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chabad.org
Males could have been created without the foreskin, yet G-d wanted us to remove it ourselves. This was to demonstrate that as we complete the physical appearance of our bodies, so can we perfect the contours of our personalities and the shapes of our souls.3
see complete article here: http://www.chabad.org/parshah/articl...k-of-Truth.htm
post #22 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by kroonkles View Post
The whole point of a bris is because G-d wanted us to remove it ourselves.
Not everyone believes the same way.
post #23 of 38
The Book of J is a very controversial example of the school of Biblical Criticism. It can't be assumed to be 'historical fact' in any sense of the word at all -- it is an academic theory.

If you're born Jewish, I suppose you can take on whatever 'beliefs' you want about where Torah comes from.

But I must say I don't really get it -- if you feel compelled/called/drawn to convert to Judaism, but reject the Torah, what exactly is it you are converting to? The reason it is not so easy to convert to "Orthodox Judaism" (which was the only Judaism until the 1800's) is that the Torah and the mitzvos give to us by G-d that are in the Torah is binding and obligatory for all Jews. But only for Jews. Non-Jews who like certain teachings of the Torah, or are dedicated to the worship of One G-d without an intercessor, or are moved by the powerful message of morality and ethics demonstrated in the Torah, can all of course believe and do as they wish.

But why take on the name and mitzvos of Judaism when one rejects the premise that the Torah is Divine and that its mitzvos are binding?

I'm not trying to be snarky; I simply don't understand this.

If you don't want to do the mitzva of bris milah for your sons, then why take on a spiritual path of which this is an integral and obligatory part? Same goes for any other mitzva, by the way -- kashrus, keeping Shabbos, keeping the laws of family purity, keeping shatnez, observing holidays in certain ways -- I mean, all of these mitzvos are equally binding, whether or not they 'resonate' or are 'relevant' on a daily basis. If you are a born Jew and decide not to practice, well, everyone has free choice and makes their own decisions.

But why opt into a religion and then reject its basic premise? I don't really understand this.
post #24 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickarolaberry View Post
The Book of J is a very controversial example of the school of Biblical Criticism. It can't be assumed to be 'historical fact' in any sense of the word at all -- it is an academic theory.

If you're born Jewish, I suppose you can take on whatever 'beliefs' you want about where Torah comes from.

But I must say I don't really get it -- if you feel compelled/called/drawn to convert to Judaism, but reject the Torah, what exactly is it you are converting to? The reason it is not so easy to convert to "Orthodox Judaism" (which was the only Judaism until the 1800's) is that the Torah and the mitzvos give to us by G-d that are in the Torah is binding and obligatory for all Jews. But only for Jews. Non-Jews who like certain teachings of the Torah, or are dedicated to the worship of One G-d without an intercessor, or are moved by the powerful message of morality and ethics demonstrated in the Torah, can all of course believe and do as they wish.

But why take on the name and mitzvos of Judaism when one rejects the premise that the Torah is Divine and that its mitzvos are binding?

I'm not trying to be snarky; I simply don't understand this.

If you don't want to do the mitzva of bris milah for your sons, then why take on a spiritual path of which this is an integral and obligatory part? Same goes for any other mitzva, by the way -- kashrus, keeping Shabbos, keeping the laws of family purity, keeping shatnez, observing holidays in certain ways -- I mean, all of these mitzvos are equally binding, whether or not they 'resonate' or are 'relevant' on a daily basis. If you are a born Jew and decide not to practice, well, everyone has free choice and makes their own decisions.

But why opt into a religion and then reject its basic premise? I don't really understand this.

I do understand what you are asking and I did not think you were being snarky. I have no problem fallowing anything else, the circumcision thing is the only thing I take issue with. of course there is noting else that requires me to mutilate my child, I know that sounds harsh, but I feel very strongly about this ( my DS1 was circumcised with out my consent in the hospital and I have never forgiven myself for not protecting him). I would no do it to my DD so why would I do it to my DS. I take my faith very seriously, and do not enter into anything with out fully researching it. I appreciate all of your responses they have given me a lot to think about.
post #25 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickarolaberry View Post
The Book of J is a very controversial example of the school of Biblical Criticism. It can't be assumed to be 'historical fact' in any sense of the word at all -- it is an academic theory.

If you're born Jewish, I suppose you can take on whatever 'beliefs' you want about where Torah comes from.

But I must say I don't really get it -- if you feel compelled/called/drawn to convert to Judaism, but reject the Torah, what exactly is it you are converting to? The reason it is not so easy to convert to "Orthodox Judaism" (which was the only Judaism until the 1800's) is that the Torah and the mitzvos give to us by G-d that are in the Torah is binding and obligatory for all Jews. But only for Jews. Non-Jews who like certain teachings of the Torah, or are dedicated to the worship of One G-d without an intercessor, or are moved by the powerful message of morality and ethics demonstrated in the Torah, can all of course believe and do as they wish.

But why take on the name and mitzvos of Judaism when one rejects the premise that the Torah is Divine and that its mitzvos are binding?

I'm not trying to be snarky; I simply don't understand this.

If you don't want to do the mitzva of bris milah for your sons, then why take on a spiritual path of which this is an integral and obligatory part? Same goes for any other mitzva, by the way -- kashrus, keeping Shabbos, keeping the laws of family purity, keeping shatnez, observing holidays in certain ways -- I mean, all of these mitzvos are equally binding, whether or not they 'resonate' or are 'relevant' on a daily basis. If you are a born Jew and decide not to practice, well, everyone has free choice and makes their own decisions.

But why opt into a religion and then reject its basic premise? I don't really understand this.
I absolutely agree with you on the Book of J. It's interesting, but it's not a source of truth. And to be honest, it doesn't matter whether he did, by some random chance, stumble on something that is 100% true. I am not converting to some parallel-universe Judaism where the Torah was written differently or "unadulterated". I am converting in this world. And there's something of value in 4000 years of tradition, regardless of your position on who wrote the Torah.

I've got a problem with the rest of your post, though, because it plays into the totally common and yet totally WRONG perception that converts have to meet a higher bar than any other kind of Jew. Which is, let's face it, pretty contrary to what we're taught in the Torah about how we should treat converts.

First, there is no Jewish person on earth who always obeys all of the Mitzvot. It's not even possible -- and even among the Mitzvot that are possible to observe, not one person always observes them all perfectly, no matter what type of Jew they are.

Second, among Jews by birth there is a whole spectrum of observance -- both in how many Mitzvot they observe and which they observe. Even more important, all Jews (and even all people) move into different ways and levels of practice as they grow and change. Why should either of those things be different for Converts? Why can't we grow and change in our faith like everyone else?

Thirdly, there is a 4000 year old tradition of struggling with parts of the Jewish text and tradition; with studying and reading and thinking and searching ourselves to find out what it is that God wants from us. What kind of Jew would I be setting myself up to be -- or would you be setting all converts up to be -- if we had to be perfectly sure of everything, perfectly comfortable and perfectly observant from the moment we poked our heads out of the Mikvah?

I'm not sure what I will do in a situation where Brit Milah becomes an actual decision rather than a theological debate. I'm not sure that I'll ever be in a position where I keep perfect kosher or that I'll ever not hand things directly to my (non-Jewish) husband when I'm on the rag. I'm open to growing into all of those things. But I do know that there is always going to be someone with your point of view who thinks that I'm not Jewish enough because I don't do X and they think X is definitive.
post #26 of 38
It's not about being "Jewish enough."

It's also not about observing all the mitzvos perfectly. Of course that's impossible -- no one can.

What it is about, rather, is that when a person converts to Judaism, one undertakes to accept the Torah in its entirety. Meaning -- that the condition of being accepted as a member of the Jewish people is the acceptance of the obligation to undertake the "yoke of Torah:" in other words, that one understands that the Torah is an organic, whole way of life.

It's one thing to fall behind on a mitzvah; everyone does at some point.

It's quite another to accept upon yourself the identity of a Jew with the full knowledge that there are parts of the Torah/mitzvos you actively reject.

Struggling with Torah and our history of it is not the same thing as rejection of Torah. Quite the opposite, in fact. We might argue about what things mean, but traditional Judaism does not dispute either the Divine origin of the Torah -- nor does it say "this mitzvah is okay but the other is barbaric/outdated."

It isn't the same thing as putting the bar higher for a ger. True, born Jews may not be cognizant of their role or their obligation in Torah. It doesn't, however, excuse them of their responsibility to keep it. And yes, born Jews I guess do have the freedom to reject their birthright -- by way of ignorance or conscious action.

Converts, however, are making a decisive and discrete choice. So my confusion remains -- why choose something and at the same time reject it?

I realize it's not a politically correct position to take. I don't believe in buffet-style Judaism; in fact I rejected that kind of Judaism (which is what I grew up in). I am under no illusions that I or anyone else is perfect; but I do believe we should all be on a road that leads to doing more rather than one that is full of a priori exclusions and detours (i.e. rejecting certain mitzvot because they seem unpleasant/repugnant/outdated/otherwise objectionable).
post #27 of 38
Hi

Just wanted to jump in here. I'm in the process of converting to Judaism. My husband is Jewish and I was raised Christian, though religion was never a big part of either of our identities. Once we started trying to have children it became important to me that we have one faith as a family, a religious tradition that our future child(ren) can belong to. As I investigated Judaism I found that it's actually much more in line with what I believe -- basically I really love that in Judaism it's not so much what you believe that's important, it's what you do that matters. I'm sure there are much more elegant ways to put that, but it really resonated with me.

Right now I'm in the midst of taking a "Judaism 101" class at a Reform synagogue, which I love. I love learning about Judaism and actually it's just great to have one night a week set aside to meet with likeminded people and talk about religious and spiritual issues. Maybe that's what Bible Study groups are like but I've never done anything like that so it's been something new and fun for me. Soon I will hopefully be matched up with a rabbi who will be my "sponsor" and guide me through the conversion process.

I really don't have the theological chops to dive into this debate about circumcision... but I will risk dipping a toe in. Nicakarolaberry, I understand the point you're making about why would someone choose to take on a faith when they disagree with the basic tenets of that religion. I think the disconnect is how one defines "basic tenets." To use an example other than circumcision, I don't plan on keeping kosher after I convert... my husband never has, and I don't think abstaining from shellfish is important. I do think observing Shabbat and giving to charity and working for good in my community are important parts of Judaism, so that's what I'm focussing on. And in the community I am joining, which is the Reform community, I'm encouraged to make those choices, thoughtfully and carefully, for myself. I guess that is pretty much the definition of buffet-style Judaism, but I don't think it's a casual thing. It's a conscious choice to engage and study and think about these issues -- which, not to be snarky but it's true, is way more than my husband has ever done vis a vis his Judaism.

I love what Belleweather has to say here:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Belleweather
Thirdly, there is a 4000 year old tradition of struggling with parts of the Jewish text and tradition; with studying and reading and thinking and searching ourselves to find out what it is that God wants from us. What kind of Jew would I be setting myself up to be -- or would you be setting all converts up to be -- if we had to be perfectly sure of everything, perfectly comfortable and perfectly observant from the moment we poked our heads out of the Mikvah?
As a convert, I'm not striving to be perfect. I'm striving to be Jewish. Contrary to what my husband would have me believe, there is a difference.
post #28 of 38
nak and postpartum brain, but...

i second what ms. cellaneous says, and her quote of belleweather too. the disconnect IS in how one defines "basic tenets", and that varies considerably between streams of judaism and even from rabbi to rabbi. i am studying with both conservative and reconstructionist rabbis, and the emphasis is on careful examination of jewish history and law, growth and change and challenging ourselves. nothing can be done outside the context of history, but at the same time, all of judaism has been growing and changing and challenging itself for thousands of years!

there is such a huge body of jewish thought on how divinity works, what god is, etc. it's not a monolithic enterprise. the struggle is part of the bargain. i imagine i will feel the tension between the divinity of torah and the non-supernatural nature of god as i believe in god for the rest of my life -- and that's a good thing!
post #29 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ms. Cellaneous View Post
Nicakarolaberry, I understand the point you're making about why would someone choose to take on a faith when they disagree with the basic tenets of that religion. I think the disconnect is how one defines "basic tenets." To use an example other than circumcision, I don't plan on keeping kosher after I convert... my husband never has, and I don't think abstaining from shellfish is important. I do think observing Shabbat and giving to charity and working for good in my community are important parts of Judaism, so that's what I'm focussing on. And in the community I am joining, which is the Reform community, I'm encouraged to make those choices, thoughtfully and carefully, for myself. I guess that is pretty much the definition of buffet-style Judaism, but I don't think it's a casual thing. It's a conscious choice to engage and study and think about these issues -- which, not to be snarky but it's true, is way more than my husband has ever done vis a vis his Judaism.
It's so interesting to me that you bring up Kashrut as an example. I'm not actively wrestling with Brit Milah right now because it's just not an issue for us since baby three is at least another 2.5 years off. But I AM wrestling with Kashrut constantly and I love hearing other people's experiences and thoughts on the process.

In our house, we eat (ate..?) a lot of pork. I can totally give up shellfish, which kinda seem icky anyway, when I'm honest with myself about it. But giving up pork is like giving up smoking -- I can do it, as long as I never tell myself that this is the last bacon I'll have in my lifetime, EVER. And as long as I have turkey bacon as a sort of erstraz Nicorette. Biblical Kosher isn't that hard... but Rabbinical Kosher is really hard on a ton of levels, so I've been spending a lot of time and energy studying the reasoning behind the development of some of the rules, and looking into things like Hekhsher Tzedek and ways to fuse ethical and sustainable food stuff with Kashrut.

There is some stuff we DO do -- trying to avoid meat and milk at the same meal (with some very carefully thought out exceptions to that) is a big one and buying processed products with a hekhsher is another -- and there are some things we've decided we'll probably never do -- having two sets of dishes (again, with some very carefully thought out exceptions), and buying kosher meat over local grass-fed meat, unless one of the local abbitoirs hires a rabbi.

My point isn't to say "OMG, look at how Jewish I am, go me." but more to point out that thinking through these things, and all the reading a studying behind that is just as tough and intense as keeping traditional Orthodox Kosher would be. And that there is a whole community of Jews who have made engaging with the meaning and ethics of the Mitzvot just a much a part of observing them as how they wash their dishes. And I see 4000 years of tradition that says that engagement with the Torah and the traditions and the meaning of God is probably more important essential to being Jewish than which pan I make oatmeal in.

So I suppose my long-winded point is this: There is a big difference between saying as a convert "Okay, I totally reject this Mitzvot out of hand, I'm not gonna do that one. What else ya got?" and engaging with the Mitzvot and all the traditions and learning and pieces that go with it and coming through that and saying, in the end, "No. I can't do it the traditional way. But I can do this." Which is what things like eco-Kashrut and Brit Shalom are about.



Oh! And one other thing -- Can I just issue a blanket apology for murdering Hebrew grammar in this thread?
post #30 of 38
Here's the thing, though. (And I mean this in all sincerity, am not sniping/snarking, and am impressed with the level of engaged thought here -- my disagreement is not the same thing as disrespect).

The Torah is a blueprint for living a Jewish life. Wrestling with the Torah and its meaning is one thing -- choosing which mitzvot are 'meaningful' is quite another. Why? Because Judaism isn't only about how we feel about G-d. It's also about our responsibility to act in a way which brings holiness and G-dliness into this world. How do we do this? By following the mitzvot. G-d Himself gave us the exact tools with which to not only feel His presence, but also with which to properly bring Him into our lives in a very concrete way.

The problem is, if you only read/accept the Written Torah, you're missing a lot. That's because G-d also gave us (through Moshe Rabbeinu -- Moses, our Teacher) the Oral Torah. It was passed down faithfully, in its entirety, orally, for about 1700 years -- until the Roman decimation of the Jewish land and people in Eretz Israel made it nearly impossible to ensure the transmission to the next generation. The Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi wrote it down (Mishna) in 200CE and by 500 CE it was completed by the Gaonim (rabbinical leaders) in Babylon.

The Oral Torah is just as important, because it fills in the details. And it's just as Divinely given. While the Rabbis wrestle with aspects of the Torah, seeking out its hidden meanings, they *never* dispute the inherent justice/truth of a mitzvah. That's the difference. There is always a fundamental commitment to the mitzvah itself; the details and the logistics are the place of debate.

Also important to remember: we consider the Torah to have three levels of meaning. Pashut (simple) -- based on the simple reading of the text (obvious meaning); D'rash (deeper meaning); and Sod (literally secret -- this would be the Kabbalistic/mystical meaning). It is impossible to understand Torah from only the Pashut level, as most of us do. Rabbis and sages literally spend their *entire lives* deciphering and studying, to derive meanings at the levels of d'rash and sod.

So it seems, well, a little bit presumptuous (?) to assume one understands all the ramifications of what a mitzvah represents based on a simple reading. I'm not saying anyone here is presumptuous or simple -- rather that there is much more than meets the eye. It's also the idea that every letter, every word, every syllable, even every vowel sound and pause in the Hebrew of the Torah is significant on a very deep level. There are no accidents, and no coincidences in the Torah.

So, does G-d care which pan you cook your oatmeal in? Does He care whether you give up pork if you become Jewish? Does He care if you touch your husband when you are in your cycle? Simple answer -- yes. Not because He wants to punish. But because you have relinquished an opportunity to get closer to Him, to bring His presence into the world in a tangible way, according to the Torah He gave us Himself. It's a lost opportunity.
post #31 of 38
Nickarolaberry,

Thanks for putting it so succinctly. Your posts are very well written and thought provoking even for someone who grew up on this stuff.
post #32 of 38
Nickarolaberry,

I also want to thank you for your posts. I could never write as eloquently as you have.
post #33 of 38
Thread Starter 
Hi Ladies,
Thought I would try to bring this thread back! I am sort of back to sq one myself. I am about 1/4 through the Torah and am feeling pretty detached these days because I feel like I am always so busy. I am thinking about going to the nearby reform shul but am kind of nervous.
anyhow just thought i would say hello!
post #34 of 38
:

Nickarolaberry ~ have I ever mentioned how much I think you totally rock?
post #35 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickarolaberry View Post
Here's the thing, though. (And I mean this in all sincerity, am not sniping/snarking, and am impressed with the level of engaged thought here -- my disagreement is not the same thing as disrespect).

The Torah is a blueprint for living a Jewish life. Wrestling with the Torah and its meaning is one thing -- choosing which mitzvot are 'meaningful' is quite another. Why? Because Judaism isn't only about how we feel about G-d. It's also about our responsibility to act in a way which brings holiness and G-dliness into this world. How do we do this? By following the mitzvot. G-d Himself gave us the exact tools with which to not only feel His presence, but also with which to properly bring Him into our lives in a very concrete way.

The problem is, if you only read/accept the Written Torah, you're missing a lot. That's because G-d also gave us (through Moshe Rabbeinu -- Moses, our Teacher) the Oral Torah. It was passed down faithfully, in its entirety, orally, for about 1700 years -- until the Roman decimation of the Jewish land and people in Eretz Israel made it nearly impossible to ensure the transmission to the next generation. The Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi wrote it down (Mishna) in 200CE and by 500 CE it was completed by the Gaonim (rabbinical leaders) in Babylon.

The Oral Torah is just as important, because it fills in the details. And it's just as Divinely given. While the Rabbis wrestle with aspects of the Torah, seeking out its hidden meanings, they *never* dispute the inherent justice/truth of a mitzvah. That's the difference. There is always a fundamental commitment to the mitzvah itself; the details and the logistics are the place of debate.

Also important to remember: we consider the Torah to have three levels of meaning. Pashut (simple) -- based on the simple reading of the text (obvious meaning); D'rash (deeper meaning); and Sod (literally secret -- this would be the Kabbalistic/mystical meaning). It is impossible to understand Torah from only the Pashut level, as most of us do. Rabbis and sages literally spend their *entire lives* deciphering and studying, to derive meanings at the levels of d'rash and sod.

So it seems, well, a little bit presumptuous (?) to assume one understands all the ramifications of what a mitzvah represents based on a simple reading. I'm not saying anyone here is presumptuous or simple -- rather that there is much more than meets the eye. It's also the idea that every letter, every word, every syllable, even every vowel sound and pause in the Hebrew of the Torah is significant on a very deep level. There are no accidents, and no coincidences in the Torah.

So, does G-d care which pan you cook your oatmeal in? Does He care whether you give up pork if you become Jewish? Does He care if you touch your husband when you are in your cycle? Simple answer -- yes. Not because He wants to punish. But because you have relinquished an opportunity to get closer to Him, to bring His presence into the world in a tangible way, according to the Torah He gave us Himself. It's a lost opportunity.
Beautiful. You have an eloquence which far surpasses mine.
post #36 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyka View Post
:

Nickarolaberry ~ have I ever mentioned how much I think you totally rock?
Wow, thank you.
post #37 of 38
I'm a Jew by choice. I do not keep orthodox kosher. My DH and I sleep in the same bed all the time. I have always been very anti-circumcision.

And then I had my son. Remember the saying that you know everything about parenting until you become one? Yeah, you know everything about bris milah until you're faced with it.

I, the anti-circumcision advocate, had a bris for my son 8 days after his birth. I did it, fully knowing what I was doing to him (and yeah, I get that it makes me the worst kind of mom to some people on this board).

Nicarolaberry, I love the line "a fundamental commitment to the mitzvah itself." That's what it is. As Jews, we do and THEN understand. I didn't like it, I struggled with it even while I watched my son's bris, and I continue to struggle with it today - but I committed to the mitzvah, because I believe in the whole Torah.

So as much as you think you may know what you'll do, you don't. This Jew who even when sh was pregnant said she'd never have a bris for her son - DID and THEN understood.
post #38 of 38
Nickarolaberry:

I think your posts have been awesome.

I just wanted to post a few books that I read and liked back when I was exploring Judaism that may (or may not) interest the OP.

"The Complete Idiot's Guide to Understanding Judaism" by Rabbi Benjamin Blech.

"Choosing a Jewish Life" by Anita Diamant

"To Be A Jew" by Hayim Donin

"The Committed Life" by Rebbetzin Esther Jungreiss

"How to Run a Traditional Jewish Household" by Blu Greenberg

"The Book of Jewish Values" by Joseph Telushkin (This is great...as there are daily readings.)

"The Jewish Book of WHy Vol. 1 & 2" by Arthur Kolatch

"Five Books of Miriam: A Woman's Commentary on the Torah" by Ellen Frankel


Hope this helps.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Religious Studies
Mothering › Forums › Natural Family Living › Spirituality › Religious Studies › Anyone Jewish-By-Choice?