Can anyone find a point to pick with this article?
http://www.ajc.com/search/content/op...lyed_1009.html
What I found interesting was that in 1959 there were 4 million cases of measles, and 385 deaths. (fatality rate: about 1 in 10,000)
Then, in order to quell fears about the MMR vaccine, they claim it causes febrile seizures in about three out of 10,000 (bad news) but not ONE death (good news). I'm not sure whether to be worried that the risk of a febrile seizure from the vax is 3 times higher than the risk of dying from getting measles, or to be relieved that the death rate is 0... or is it really? Does this seem a little far fetched that not ONE death has resulted from MMR since..... (1979 is it?)
(Of course, they never acknowledge the stats on mumps or rubella in the article at all)
Those more knowledgable on this, I'd love to have your input on this article. Thank you in advance.
http://www.ajc.com/search/content/op...lyed_1009.html
What I found interesting was that in 1959 there were 4 million cases of measles, and 385 deaths. (fatality rate: about 1 in 10,000)
Then, in order to quell fears about the MMR vaccine, they claim it causes febrile seizures in about three out of 10,000 (bad news) but not ONE death (good news). I'm not sure whether to be worried that the risk of a febrile seizure from the vax is 3 times higher than the risk of dying from getting measles, or to be relieved that the death rate is 0... or is it really? Does this seem a little far fetched that not ONE death has resulted from MMR since..... (1979 is it?)
(Of course, they never acknowledge the stats on mumps or rubella in the article at all)
Those more knowledgable on this, I'd love to have your input on this article. Thank you in advance.






