Quote:
Originally Posted by Spring Sun 
When I was pg with ds I was the only one I knew in my 20's that was pg-in this whole town. In all the prenatal classes I took I did not meet one person in their 20's. So, here, doctors are nice about being older. Honestly, I think it is all about the doctor. We know for sure that risks are higher for women over 35, especially those who have never given birth before. But it is always up to the mother whether to get tests or do anything different. If the doctor does not see that, then I would go to a different doctor.
|
Well, I believe that the difference in risk is minimal and misleading. For instance, perhaps I have a higher probability for having a child with Down Syndrome. However, more children with Down Syndrome are born to YOUNG mothers. So what is the "real" risk vs. the perceived risk? Just one example.
I don't have the option of changing doctors.

My husband is in the Army and if I want our insurance to pay for my maternity care, I have to see who they assign me to. Now, hopefully I'll have some choice within the ENORMOUS maternity clinic. But that doesn't really mean anything, if I can't choose whom I want at my birth, and if the schedulers a putting me with different providers each visit. I've heard I can push to see the same provider each time, but that it is very hard to accomplish.
NOW you see why I'm apprehensive, right?!

My last birth was a UC, mostly UP. And now I am faced with the most opposite situation in the world. Where I had to get my blood drawn to prove pregnancy the day after I had an u/s confirming pregnancy, just because that's the system. If I want a referral for OB care, they have to be able to check off the box on their form that says "positive hcg blood test". There's not box for "had an u/s that confirmed pregnancy". That's just how the Army works. And even though I don't get paid by the Army, I sure do have to go by their rules an awful lot!
