Mothering › Forums › Archives › Pregnancy Archives › September 2009 › yes/no for ultrasound?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

yes/no for ultrasound? - Page 3  

post #41 of 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarperCait View Post
I'm surprised that everyone is so against them. What are the potential risks of an ultrasound? I had not heard that there was anything particularly bad about them? Could someone educate me??
You've gotten some great replies.... I don't do a US simply b/c I would worry *more* by doing that; I'm having this baby, hoping for the best and I just try to let nature do her job. I accept the risks by not trying to control them- does that make sense?

Dd is going to add these:
post #42 of 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by citizenfong View Post
Thanks for that link. What an enlightening discussion.

I find the obgyn.net forums endlessly fascinating.

I'm stalking those forums, regularly!
I'm amazed, on a daily basis.

Good point re: Doppler.
post #43 of 53
After reading the risks involved is us, I am feeling worried about getting one. But I have no idea how far along I am. I don't remember when my last period was and I think even if I did remember (I have a rough estimate, just not an exact day) I am sure I am not that far along, but a week or two behind. I have an us scheduled for next week to date this pregnancy. I don't know how I could get through this pregnancy in one piece if I didn't know how far along I am.

Someone told me it will be a vaginal ultrasound. How far along do you need to be for them to do a regular one?
post #44 of 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by citizenfong View Post
A lot of people don't know that the Doppler is an u/s, and that it is more powerful then a regular 2-D scan. Just a few minutes with the Doppler is equivalent to a 20-minute abdominal scan.
This is definitely something to keep in mind. With my son I expressed a desire to have the dr use a fetoscope instead of a doppler and I was told they don't actually have one. This time I have my own, and I'll take it to appointments with me if it keeps the Doppler away from me. Not only is the Doppler U/S, but so is the Electronic Fetal Monitor used during NSTs, and during labor in most hospitals.

My general advice is that if you're considering U/S, a very serious discussion needs to happen between you and your partner. If the U/S shows a life-threatening defect, do you carry the pregnancy to term? Yes, that's a controversial subject, but you and your partner need to be on the same page. If you have not established the answer to that question between the two of you, I would not recommend ever having an U/S. Everyone is so happy to be pg, and just wants to see the baby and find out the sex, but forgets that in fact U/S can find some serious defects, and it may in fact wind up being one of the worst days of your life, rather than one of the best. Emotionally you as mother are so tied up into this being, that you need to know going in what you will do if that scan shows something, because making the decision after the fact is extremely difficult. If going in, you have established between you what you agree to and want to have happen, then you have ground rules, and neither of you are liable to feel pressured into making a decision. Feeling pressured to make a decision can destroy your relationship right at the time when you need it to be strong.

Now, if the answer is that you'll do nothing about it if the scan shows something life threatening, then why are you having the scan? So you can spend the next 4 months stressing about it? Worrying? The baby feels every emotion you do and making your pregnancy stressful is not good for you or the baby. If the mama is determined to carry the pregnancy to term regardless of the outcome of the scans, then I would never recommend she have a scan, the risks are not worth it.

If the answer is that you'll terminate the pregnancy if there's something life threatening, then go ahead and have the scan. Yes, there are risks involved, but it is still safer than amnio and can tell you things amnio can't. It can be reassuring, but you need to be prepared for the possibility that you will not like the outcome. In this instance, the scan will determine what path your life will take. Never go alone to an U/S - if your partner can't make it, take a friend.
post #45 of 53
I just wanted to thank Octobermoon for starting this thread and Citizenfong and cristeen for their input. I found it very helpful and interesting!

I have to have a u/s to find out how many babies are in there, but I will make sure it is of the safest type.
post #46 of 53
Barring any special circumstances I plan on having two ultra sounds.

A dating one, because with my son's birth I had a difficult time where the hospital "determined" that he was born at 33 weeks despite him being 35 weeks by LMP. When I had the dating ultrasound faxed over (they had lost it) suddenly he was taken of CPAP and treated like a 35 week baby with developed lungs. At the time I had the ultrasound because it was my first pregnancy and I was nervous and wanted to hear the heartbeat, but it proved invaluable. I also think it is the most accurate way of determining gestation and can be helpful if I am overdue.

An anatomy scan around 20 weeks. Mostly I want this so if G-d forbid something might be wrong with the baby it can be monitored, and I can make the choice to research specialists and possible even deliver in a place best equipped to deal with special circumstances. Although an unlikely situation I can't ignore the possibility of in utero surgery.
post #47 of 53
I will do a 20 week sono b/c it makes my hubby feel safer going into our homebirth. But unless something medical comes up, that will be the only one.
post #48 of 53
Yep. I was high-risk with my other 3 (all for different reasons) and had many Level 2 US with each one. This time around, I'm 35+, which classifies me as high-risk due to advanced maternal age (I use an OB, so I'm sure it would be diff. w/a MW) and I'll have at least one Level II scan w/the perinatologists.

We had upwards of 11 Level 2 ultrasounds w/DD#1, I think 7 with DD#2 and 4 or 5 w/DS. They are all perfect (one is genius spectrum, other is profoundly gifted, and we don't know about DS yet with no health problems) and I don't worry about the exposure.
post #49 of 53
I will be having many. I'm taking part in a study on fetal growth, so they'll be doing ultrasounds 4 times, and then I'm sure I'll have some with my doctor too. Normally I wouldn't be such a big fan of ultrasounds, although I did have 2 with each of my other two pregnancies. This pregnancy is after the full term death of my son last September, so it will be treated a lot differently, and I will need a lot more reassurance. I will be glad to have someone checking in on my baby regularly.
post #50 of 53
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMR View Post
I will be having many. I'm taking part in a study on fetal growth, so they'll be doing ultrasounds 4 times, and then I'm sure I'll have some with my doctor too. Normally I wouldn't be such a big fan of ultrasounds, although I did have 2 with each of my other two pregnancies. This pregnancy is after the full term death of my son last September, so it will be treated a lot differently, and I will need a lot more reassurance. I will be glad to have someone checking in on my baby regularly.
so sorry for your loss and can't even imagine how hard that must be. ultrasounds are certainly good in many cases.
post #51 of 53
I will have two. A dating ultrasound because my December cycle was wonky and I may have actually conceived then.

And I'll definitely have a 20 week ultrasound to check for any signs of 22q deletion in this baby since my second son has the syndrome. My husband and I both underwent genetic testing after his diagnosis and neither of us has the deletion, but one of us could have a mutation that causes the deletion and they don't know what that mutation is yet. Our chances of having another 22q baby are estimated at 1-2 in 100. The general population occurence of this syndrome is 1 in 2000-4000, so our chances are hugely increased. If there are any soft markers for the syndrome, then that will change my birth plans, as Connor required immediate medical attention at birth. I also plan on talking to the OB about a fetal heart echo, because cardiac defects are extremely common in 22q, and is something that would hugely effect delivery and the care the baby receives in utero.

So...at least 2 for me. Possibly one of them being a level II. I'm comfortable with the risks, considering my alternative is CVS or amnio, and I'm NOT comfortable with those risks.
post #52 of 53
I've now had two...and I'm 8 weeks. There is likely to be another to check for heartbeat, if my numbers go up. And if all goes well, there is one at 20 weeks. So that would be four. Yikes! lol

I've only had one during pregnancy before this.
post #53 of 53

Hi everybody

I just found out yesterday that we will be plus one 9-22-09!!!(first i thought it would be October but I recalculated)

anyway...I had a c section after being fully dilated for over 12 hours and trying everything (including forceps) with my first dtr and might do just 1 short ultra sound

I am trying a vbac...anybody else in that boat...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: September 2009
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Archives › Pregnancy Archives › September 2009 › yes/no for ultrasound?