Quote:
Originally Posted by Gitti 
So if there were a vaccine for those, you would have gotten it. Now since there isn't you'll take other measures.
Was your decision to get the other vaccines based on fear or the fact that there was a vaccine available?
|
Good question.
For me the decision not to vaccinate has had to do with the risk of the disease vs. the risk of the vaccine. For things like CP, Measles, Mumps, Pertussis, I've felt confident that we could deal with the illness and that the risk of the vaccine was worse than the disease itself. I still feel this way. For more serious illnesses, such as polio and tetanus, I considered the risk of actually getting the disease to begin with and decided it was so low that the vaccine wasn't necessary.
In the case of Hep A and typhoid, I felt that the risk of the disease, my unfamiliarity with the disease, the severity of the disease and the limited treatments available all gave me consideration for the vaccine. If there was a vax available for Dengue fever, I may have gotten that as well. For something like typhus (which we were at risk b/cause DD is very prone to lice) I decided against it because it is so easily treated with antibiotics and the vax itself sounded more risky.
I'm not saying that my logic is perfect, or even good. But it's where I'm at.

Honestly, between quitting our jobs, selling our house and deciding to travel, I'm surprised I am not more of a basket case!
I've always loved your intelligent + reasoned responses, Gitti. Thanks for your thoughtful questions.
