My first child is due in about a month. I knew, vaguely, that some people had problems with vaccines and didn't want to vaccinate their kids. I didn't have any reasons to think there were any problems with vaccines, but I figured, as part of being a responsible parent, I should do a little research.
So the first thing I looked up is the vaccine they give to newborns -- Hep B. I was surprised by what I found: namely that there seems to be no public health reason at all to give that shot to a newborn whose mother isn't infected. Even the pro vaccine websites just said that it was good in case maternal infection was missed, and that it helps "ensure compliance" with the whole series of shots. Seems like a sketchy reason to inject something into a very new baby.
Now, this makes me wonder about the trustworthiness of the rest of the vaccine recommendations, and I need some help making good decisions.
Can you point me to links of studies looking at long term impacts comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated populations? (for any of the vaccines, any country, whatever's out there in terms of peer-reviewed research).
Thanks
So the first thing I looked up is the vaccine they give to newborns -- Hep B. I was surprised by what I found: namely that there seems to be no public health reason at all to give that shot to a newborn whose mother isn't infected. Even the pro vaccine websites just said that it was good in case maternal infection was missed, and that it helps "ensure compliance" with the whole series of shots. Seems like a sketchy reason to inject something into a very new baby.
Now, this makes me wonder about the trustworthiness of the rest of the vaccine recommendations, and I need some help making good decisions.
Can you point me to links of studies looking at long term impacts comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated populations? (for any of the vaccines, any country, whatever's out there in terms of peer-reviewed research).
Thanks










:
:
