Quote:
Originally Posted by Matilda_z 
Wow.  : That's a little insulting, I'm in Canada with a midwife and it would be completely unacceptable for me as well. My practice very carefully takes on a set number of patients with staggered dates, and you get to know all the midwives, just in case an emergency occurs and your primary IS at another birth. Please do not spread the misconception that universal heathcare is inferior because we do not 'pay' for it. We do pay for it, in fact we pay enough that no one has to worry about their healthcare - ever.
It sounds like the OP is in a situation that women in most countries would find unacceptable. No matter where she lives it sounds as if she is dealing with a practice that is not operating properly for some reason. I think that the problem probably centres on the midwife, and not the country's heathcare system.
|
I'm certainly not bashing socialized medicine. I lived in Australia and
New Zealand for two years and I can't tell you how much I wish the US had a similar system. In my state 25 percent of the population doesn't have health insurance, including 2.6 million children.
I was asking the question because I try to keep up to date on homebirth policies nationwide, and for the last two years Britain has been experiencing a shortage of homebirth midwives. They can't currently guarantee a homebirth to every woman who wants one, and they're working to change that. I was wondering if she was in a similar situation.
So I'd ask you to hold off a little bit before you automatically take offense and assign motives.