or Connect
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Pregnancy and Birth › I'm Pregnant › Cervical Checks
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Cervical Checks

post #1 of 38
Thread Starter 
I'm trying to figure out why anyone would want one if they were not having any preterm labor issues?

I'll be 35 weeks on Friday and I have never had a cervical check. I have no desire to know how effaced I am or what station or any of that. What's the purpose? At this point if I go into labor they won't stop it anyway and women can be finger tip dilated (or more) for weeks before they deliver.

So can someone give me one good reason to have an internal cervical check?
post #2 of 38
Because doctors seem to think it actually means something, despite evidence to the contrary. Imo, there isn't actually a good reason, just curiousity & a desire to make it seem like they're doing something.
post #3 of 38
If you had to be induced and needed to know your bishop score. Other than that I just don't know.
post #4 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Heart View Post
If you had to be induced and needed to know your bishop score. Other than that I just don't know.
I agree that it's beneficial in this case. Also if you're unsure of baby's position the dr/mw can tell if there's a head down there or not. I don't really think there's a benefit to giving routine internal exams to full-term women though. Nothing wrong with refusing.
post #5 of 38
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Heart View Post
If you had to be induced and needed to know your bishop score. Other than that I just don't know.
If you HAD to be induced would they even care what your bishop's score was?
post #6 of 38
Well, I agreed to one (it was after 36w though) because my last labor was horrific and nearly 22 hours long. So it was a huge comfort to me to know that my body is working and being proactive this time. Already I've dilated the same as what it took over 8 hours of painful labor (and nonstop vomiting) to get to. That has just been an enormous comfort to me and is helping me feel much more confident about this birthing experience and what it will be like.

I understand some mamas being anti-cervical checks and that's fine. But for others, like me, checks can be helpful because they are reassuring.
post #7 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeannaK View Post
If you HAD to be induced would they even care what your bishop's score was?
It might help them decide what route to take with induction (whether the cervix needed to be ripened, whether AROM might be enough, etc)
post #8 of 38
I have what is called "Incompetent Cervix" - basically you start dilating/effacing early on and often with NO symptoms. I lost a baby at 19 weeks because of this. Had my cervix been getting checked we may have been able to catch it before it was too late.
post #9 of 38
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by nigellas View Post
I have what is called "Incompetent Cervix" - basically you start dilating/effacing early on and often with NO symptoms. I lost a baby at 19 weeks because of this. Had my cervix been getting checked we may have been able to catch it before it was too late.
That is different, that is pre-term labor issues. I'm talking about those of us at 34+ weeks with no pre-term labor issues. I agree, if you have pre-term labor issues or you are worried about them due to a previous pregnancy than cervical checks would be beneficial.
post #10 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devaskyla View Post
Because doctors seem to think it actually means something, despite evidence to the contrary. Imo, there isn't actually a good reason, just curiousity & a desire to make it seem like they're doing something.
Because I think some women think it actually means something. I luuurve seeing women go "I'm 2 cm dilated and 60% effaced--Doc says I'm going into labor soon!" (and they spend another 4 weeks walking around like that --which of course women do not like to hear) and another will go "Not effaced, not dilated, baby high and floating free. I'll be going overdue, likely." (and their kid is born--naturally--by breakfast the next morning ).
post #11 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by nighten View Post
Well, I agreed to one (it was after 36w though) because my last labor was horrific and nearly 22 hours long. So it was a huge comfort to me to know that my body is working and being proactive this time. Already I've dilated the same as what it took over 8 hours of painful labor (and nonstop vomiting) to get to. That has just been an enormous comfort to me and is helping me feel much more confident about this birthing experience and what it will be like.

I understand some mamas being anti-cervical checks and that's fine. But for others, like me, checks can be helpful because they are reassuring.
But they are only reassuring if they give you the answer they want to hear and what happens afterwards fits in with that. If you are found to be 2cm dilated and 50% effaced, that might feel like great news, will it still feel like great news though if 2 weeks later you haven't birthed and another check has you at the same point? Similarly how would you feel if you got checked and there was nothing happening? Probably you'd feel quite discouraged, but then plenty of women will have babies within hours of such a check, because it's a check that has little if any predictive value.
post #12 of 38
I'm more medically oriented than many on these boards, yet I agree that a cervical check in this circumstance is pointless. At best it could give you some vague information about possible timing of things. At worst, it could speed up when you go into labor by irritating cervix, etc. At some earlier stages of twin pregnancy it can definitely make sense, if there's indications of shortened cervix on u/s or increased BH contractions, etc.-- because at earlier stages there are interventions you might want to forestall preterm labor. (And, sadly, incompetent cervix has no symptoms really to act as a warning sign) But at 35 weeks, there's nothing they're going to do to hold off labor at this point anyway, especially at 35 weeks with twins.
post #13 of 38
just on to share my experience: with dd2 my OB did it routinely starting at 36w and i didn't know to refuse it. i went into labor that night and had a horrible, drawn out labor experience (i wasn't fully 37w yet so they wouldn't help me with labor but i wasn't 35w either, so they wouldn't stop it....i spent 5 days in the hospital in labor limbo hell) i definitely think the unnecessary check had something to do with it. :
post #14 of 38
My ob told me the only reason she started doing them routinely was because the overwhelming majority of her patients wanted them. She considers them pretty pointless if you aren't considering an induction for some reason.
post #15 of 38
Quote:
That is different, that is pre-term labor issues
What I was trying to get across is that IC is symptomless, so you aren't having PTL symptoms until it's too late. A cervical check would clue you in early enough that there is a problem.
So anyway, I'm a huge fan of them during the 2nd trimester when IC presents itself. Beyond that, I'd agree with you.
post #16 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2lilsweetfoxes View Post
Because I think some women think it actually means something. I luuurve seeing women go "I'm 2 cm dilated and 60% effaced--Doc says I'm going into labor soon!" (and they spend another 4 weeks walking around like that --which of course women do not like to hear) and another will go "Not effaced, not dilated, baby high and floating free. I'll be going overdue, likely." (and their kid is born--naturally--by breakfast the next morning ).
But why do so many women think it means something? It's because dr's & a lot of pregnancy books imply or out right tell them it means something. Heck, lots of doctors seem to think it actually means something. I can't tell you how many times I've heard women say they wound up with a cesarean because at some arbitrary date they weren't dilated or effaced at all so the doctor told them they weren't going to go into labour.
post #17 of 38
My midwife checked me several times in the weeks preceding my due date, and I was one of those who walked around at 4 cm dilated, 90% effaced, baby well descended (I could feel his head myself, no problem). So then the question became, "why aren't you going into labor?". I would rather not have known, because it ended up being too much pressure and concern for something that was just me, just my body's slower, gentler way of going into labor. This time one of the first questions I asked was if they did cervical checks, and was relieved to find out that they did only if *I* wanted it.

BTW, even after 3 weeks of 4cm dilated and 90% effaced, I ended up having to home-induce with castor oil(in order to avoid a scheduled hospital induction) at around 40 weeks. I don't know how long my body would have gone without me prodding it, but my cervical signs certainly didn't at all mean that labor was imminent. They just meant my induction could be successful.
post #18 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeannaK View Post
If you HAD to be induced would they even care what your bishop's score was?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollin View Post
It might help them decide what route to take with induction (whether the cervix needed to be ripened, whether AROM might be enough, etc)
Exactly. When I was faced with induction my ob said AROM would do it (based on my bishop score). He was right, had a 2.5 hour easy labor. (I was way past my edd at that point too, it wasn't routine ve).

They have their benefits but I think it has way too many draw backs.
post #19 of 38
I can't have a doctor do a pap smear without heavy sedation and muscle relaxants. Seriously! I've never been abused, but I just can't tolerate another person touching me in that area (unless it's me or my partner).

So, I am hoping for an issue free pregnancy. It's way too much stress for me to have anyone touch me down there, and I'd like to avoid drugs during my pregnancy.

Because I have these issues, I'm totally biased in the sense that I can't understand at all why anyone would agree to cervical checks. Just the thought of it makes me cringe. Assuming, of course, no health issues or problems.
post #20 of 38
I think it's so you can have a response when people ask you if you are dilated! If you're not brave enough to tell them to f$%k off, that is.

I am not surprised by the pp, that women want to know. Many of my friends have told me that they're going to have their babies early because they were dilated and effaced whatever at 36 weeks. Then it's not too surprising when they've decided to induce when the baby hasn't arrived by 38 weeks.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: I'm Pregnant
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Pregnancy and Birth › I'm Pregnant › Cervical Checks