The people at DH's company who are getting severance packages are entry-level and just-above entry-level. Just FWIW.
post #41 of 123
2/4/09 at 6:22pm
|
I have quite a bit of experience with organization of large companies and layoffs, and I can state unequivocally that this statement is quite misleading. It is true that there are backfill positions that are included in the numbers but generally the percentage is relatively small. Eliminating 10,000 jobs, in my experience, generally means eliminating perhaps about 9,000 real positions, 1,000 backfill positions.
Also, regarding contractors, the percentage of contractors paid significantly more pales in comparison to the number of those hired because the company could get away with not paying benefits and paying a low wage. Therefore, even if the job cuts are to contractors, they still represent a real loss for the person cut, because most contractors are not in the higher salary category in the first place. My DH's family is not from here, but they're seeing the same problems where they live. I also don't think that the expensive protections in place in other countries are going to last long in the face of sharply declining tax revenue. This isn't just a U.S. problem, nor is it solely originated or caused by the U.S. Then again, I know many, many people who are seriously suffering now, so I find it hard to consider this academic. |
:
|
I've been laid off several times and have never gotten a severence package. The only people I know of who got them were in much, much higher positions than I am.
|
|
On one hand, I feel similarly to Denvergirlie. I do think that the course we were on previously was unsustainable. The bubble had to burst sometime. Our current economic situation doesn't surprise me, but I do have empathy for those who are having a difficult time right now.
|

|
There is a lot I'd like to reply to here, but don't have the time right now.
I do want to say that the current unemployment numbers are under reported because it does not take into account many factors including those who have exhausted their unemployment insurance, those who have taken multiple low-paying jobs to make up the difference, and those that were part-time (and really contributing to the household budget). In the end, while the numbers themselves that are reported (of lay-offs, that is) seem high, it is a pitiful representation of the current situation. I'm afraid that the situation is much worse than even is reported. |
|
There is a lot I'd like to reply to here, but don't have the time right now.
I do want to say that the current unemployment numbers are under reported because it does not take into account many factors including those who have exhausted their unemployment insurance, those who have taken multiple low-paying jobs to make up the difference, and those that were part-time (and really contributing to the household budget). In the end, while the numbers themselves that are reported (of lay-offs, that is) seem high, it is a pitiful representation of the current situation. I'm afraid that the situation is much worse than even is reported. |

|
We're also not from the US originally, and don't know anyone who has been personally impacted by the economy and the layoffs. Because of this, what we know about the crisis is mostly academic, and I admit that there's a sense of "holy crap, you people did this do yourselves." I don't mean that so much on an individual level. We aren't blaming working stiffs and young families. Rather, in Canada, there are systems in place, and a culture that better protects people from swings in the economy.
|
|
I'm in Canada. My mom is struggling to pay her mortgage, because her field has collapsed. My brother is a partner in a moving company, and may end up going under, after...15? 16? years...because the housing market has crashed, and nobody is moving.
People in Canada are being affected, too. It may not be as bad, but it's still happening...and there's no way to know how bad it will get. And, while Canadians aren't as debt-dependent and savings-averse as Americans, statistically, we're hardly superstars in either department, ourselves. |
|
When I lived in Canada I noticed that you guys had some perks we don't have- health care, affordable colleges, etc that explain the discrepancy there. My guess is we're both pretty savings-averse, but you guys are better with social support than we in the states are. Lucky Canadians, darn it!
|
:|
I was under the impression though that most of the economic downturn was the result of the American subprime mortgage situation. What factors outside the US have been significant contributers?
|
|
I was wondering about severance packages. There's been no mention of them at all in the news, but when DH got laid off at AOL the packages were wonderful and people wanted to get a lay off notice. We know people who got what amounted to a year's salary. They were talented people, all found new jobs within a couple months, and had a nice nest egg from AOL.
|
That really sucked when I was 28 weeks pregnant and we have a child with special needs and were losing her health insurance the end of that month.
|
When I lived in Canada I noticed that you guys had some perks we don't have- health care, affordable colleges, etc that explain the discrepancy there. My guess is we're both pretty savings-averse, but you guys are better with social support than we in the states are. Lucky Canadians, darn it!
|



Follow Mothering