Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › Let's Talk About "Discreet" and Lactivism
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Let's Talk About "Discreet" and Lactivism

post #1 of 127
Thread Starter 
I just had a somewhat disheartening and frustrating conversation with one of my sisters. And it reminded me of moments here where we have discussed the issue of "discreet" breastfeeding ... that is, whether emphasizing how 'discreet' breastfeeding can be, does a disservice to lactivism and becomes a 'six of one, half-dozen of the other' measure, wherein for every woman who becomes more comfortable about breastfeeding, knowing she can do so 'discreetly' (whatever that means), there is someone else interpreting that as 'breastfeeding should be hidden....'



So .... I've been breastfeeding for most of the past 5+ years. I'm from a breastfeeding family; all my sisters have breastfed their biological children (that makes four of us thus far) - duration ranging from 4 months of exclusive bf, to weaning at 6 months or a year (or obviously in my case, past two years of age second time 'round now )....

So my older sister, who's bf all three of her children, was describing a local controversy; apparently a mother was breastfeeding at a restaurant, and when another customer complained, the restaurant told that customer that the mother's right to bf was protected. So the customer wrote a nastygram to the local paper and there was a big controversy (cue the standard "NIP Scandal" music) .....

My sister's take on it was that the baby was only 3-4 months old, but the mother probably should have been more discreet, although she had no idea whether the mother was being discreet or not. Sister says, "I was too uncomfortable to bf in public at all, I always used formula in public!" She notes that she doesn't eat in front of other people often, herself, even as defense.

I told her, one person's 'discreet' is another person's 'harlot,' the bottom line is that the mother was feeding her baby the way that everyone recommends, and there's nothing sexual about it. And that especially for a young, first-time mother, it's awkward learning how to nurse comfortably in public. I told her, mothers should nurse however is comfortable for them and their baby, whether it's with a cape (which she'd never heard of), or nursing top, or their shirt pulled down, or whatever [that was her definition of OTT and immodest]. And that it wasn't and shouldn't be those mothers' concerns what sort of judgmental or dirty thoughts others might have about doing the right thing for her baby. And pointed out that I've nursed my 2 1/2 year old in public without issues. And that some babies latch on/off suddenly, or insist on an uncovered breast, and should those moms be in purdah for the duration? I've just been lucky not to have a babe like that.

Sister agrees ... BUT ... "You know, elanorh, you're so discreet, no one ever knows you're nursing. Not everyone is that careful and considerate."

I shot back that I've had a lot of practice, and again, it's less about me being concerned about others' comfort, and more about not wanting to flash post-partumness around.

But have been left with a nagging feeling ever since. I nurse how I am most comfortable (which, especially with older nurslings, means that it's often wearing a nursing top or a shirt which I can easily pull up without flashing skin; and I'm pretty adept at latching without flashing).

I still firmly believe that mothers should nurse however they are most comfortable, and that we (as individuals and society) need to work to help mothers feel comfortable nursing in public .... But I am wondering, are those of us who for whatever reason would fall into the 'discreet' category, harming our own cause?

Because I'm pretty dang sure my sister has dusted me off as an example of how a woman COULD, if she WANTED to, nurse with no one knowing what she was doing, even with an older babe (with the unspoken indictment being, those mothers who are obvious for whatever reason, are lacking in class and/or being exhibitionists). I know that I am more 'discreet' as my babies become older, knowing the social stigma there is upon nursing beyond 12-18 months if that, even.....

On the other hand, there's the argument that if breastfeeding is presented in an in-your-face manner, then some mothers would choose not to because they wouldn't be comfortable [nursing without a cape; nursing in regular clothes instead of nursing tops; nursing with their shirt pulled down or up] .... I can see this going the other way too though; nursing looking like a complicated pattern of subterfuge could look really overwhelming and like a lot of fuss, too ....

It's a knotty issue, I hope we can discuss with a wide range of opinions and ideas .... I'd like to get a lot of perspectives on the idea, and I think it's an idea which we as lactivists need to really reflect upon.
post #2 of 127
I find when I've talked about BFing with moms who are not "lactivists" (I don't really think I qualify as one either, so maybe my opinion isn't solicited), helping them understand how to be "discreet" frees them up to BF more often and more completely (so they don't only do formula in public like you said your one sister did).

I can see what you are saying about "discretion" being something that is so subjective that it is hard to nail down, and that when public nursing isn't noticed it doesn't advocate for nursing. I don't have a solution for either of those problems.

Tjej
post #3 of 127
I tend to be discreet more for me than for anyone else. I'm just not the kind of person who can lift up her shirt and have that be it, but it's more because of the amount of skin that is exposed of my stomach than anything to do with my boobs! I don't own any nursing clothing (except a nursing tank, which I generally wear UNDER another shirt/sweater anyway...never by itself), and I usually use a cover of some sort - a blanket, or I do have a dedicated nursing cover.

That said, if I'm in a back booth at a restaurant or something (don't eat out a lot, so this doesn't happen often!), and DS is fussy and just HAS to nurse, I'll lift my shirt on the side that is closest to the wall, and nurse that way. Or I'll go out to the car, if I can't get in a comfortable position in the booth (i.e. the table is too close), or go to a dressing room if I'm in a store. But again, that's more for *me* than it is to keep anyone else from being offended.

I've never noticed anyone around here nursing...maybe it's because I don't get out much, or everyone is so discreet that I don't notice it, or there are lots of formula fed babies. (I notice bottles, but I've never seen anyone actively nursing in the year that I've been back here.)
post #4 of 127
I think nursing for most women, by default, is inherently discreet. Lift shirt, apply baby, baby's head covers boob. There are some women who themselves feel the need, or have babies who prefer to nurse without their shirt on. It wouldn't necessarily bother me to see it, but that is beyond my own personal comfort level. If nursing my child meant that I had to remove my shirt entirely, I personally would probably spend a lot of time at home. Until my first son was a week old, the only way he would nurse properly was skin to skin, so I guess I was one of those Mamas .


I think that nursing can be and often is very discreet. I do not feel that women should feel obliged to be as discreet as possible. I do not think nursing covers are discreet. Yes, they help to cover exposed flesh, but nothing advertises "I am breastfeeding!" more than a nursing cover. However, if they empower a mother to nurse her babe and bring her confidence and comfort, this is a good thing.

Bottom line, I really look forward to living in a world where mothers can nurse their babies how they are most comfortable and no one will bat an eye either way.
post #5 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by pumpkinhead View Post
I think nursing for most women, by default, is inherently discreet. Lift shirt, apply baby, baby's head covers boob. There are some women who themselves feel the need, or have babies who prefer to nurse without their shirt on. It wouldn't necessarily bother me to see it, but that is beyond my own personal comfort level. If nursing my child meant that I had to remove my shirt entirely, I personally would probably spend a lot of time at home. Until my first son was a week old, the only way he would nurse properly was skin to skin, so I guess I was one of those Mamas .


I think that nursing can be and often is very discreet. I do not feel that women should feel obliged to be as discreet as possible. I do not think nursing covers are discreet. Yes, they help to cover exposed flesh, but nothing advertises "I am breastfeeding!" more than a nursing cover. However, if they empower a mother to nurse her babe and bring her confidence and comfort, this is a good thing.

Bottom line, I really look forward to living in a world where mothers can nurse their babies how they are most comfortable and no one will bat an eye either way.


Excellent post pumpkinhead will be back to read whole thread when have done the chores
post #6 of 127
I do think it's frustrating that people think it's acceptable if discreet. I cannot be discreet, I just can't. I think the bigger busted one is, the less possible discreetness is. People see it all. If I dont' have my shirt out of the way, I can't see what's going on, so it's all out there.

I for one am a proponent of do what you need to do and the other people can deal with it, but I know that it's a very difficult thing for many. So I guess I'm one of the ones who "just whip it out" but also hopefully to help normalize it.
post #7 of 127
I think that you have to have people on ends of the specturm. Those who just whip it out (me!), those you wear clothing that helps them keep skin covered (also me!), those who nurse with a cover of some kind, those who only nurse in private.

A specturm of comfort and discertion and everyone falls on it somewhere.

I totally believe you must have extermes for anyone to even respect moderates. (and I am all to willing to be the exterme, and not only with bfing!)
post #8 of 127
It really bugs me that many people now see bf as something outdated, dirty and bottles are better all round. It's absolute hypocrisy to demand women ' cover-up' to bf and on the other hand to make profit from exposing breasts in magazines, adverts, tv etc. How 'discreet' does a woman have to be? This opens the floodgates to the myriad different opinions from people from bf isn't 'normal' to ok but not outdoors, fine if she's discreet etc. I've heard someone say 'why are you doing that theres no need to' lololol,Since when did the opinions of others become law or even relevant in these instances? Typical woman-controlling stuff.The size of the breasts will make a difference too, mine are erm small but they were bigger when bf sigh..even tho I was very discreet much to my discomfort usually, I still got looks, words and one oldish and righteous man even thought to scold me but his wife told him not to, I actually felt very nervous at that and was sitting down the shore facing away from this man who went out of his way to stand above me to get a better look, impossible tho as I had a huge coat and a shawl on lol. I heard him saying 'she shouldnt be doing that in public'.Bleugh. So its very easy sometimes for people to infringe upon bf women and attack their confidence,self-esteem and of course their bf experience. It's no wonder so many choose not to bf and even believe they can't.These days I'm far more comfortable with my body and would relish telling that man whats what. I get that being 'discreet' can and imo does damage bf because simply we are being taught to be ashamed of our bodies and that somehow in these peoples minds bf is bad, dirty, unnecessary,exhibitionism etc even worse in some 'minds'. There will be no limits to how discreet society wants women to be considering they practically want us to vanish.

I have never seen a woman publicly display herself , cept in every newsagents,not to bf tho,I'm still waiting for those hoards of flesh-exposing women to knock me down whilst shopping. I have seen moms with large breasts struggle to not show anything and no wonder, impossible I would say. I avert my eyes on these occasions as I would anyway totally for the moms privacy and comfort as I have no fear of breasts,indeed my perfect bf society would mean I didn't have to avert my eyes as if its something bad and we were all just more comfortable with it but I'll always smile at her to let her know I'm so glad she's bf and respect her for it. Others should learn this if its not in thir nature to repect others privacy, its not hard to learn but personally I think it's more of a personal grievance about womens bodies in general, they are brainwashed with breasts always=sex, that porn is so liberating for people isn't it? it actually teaches, very successfully to objectify womens bodies especially those reproductive bits. Along with censoring everything thats worthwhile in sex and relationships,porn is a powerful tool to keep women down and I strongly feel it helps to keep people basically hating women and affects all issues relating to women like bf. Do you see people in the shops demanding the porno mags are covered-up? Of course not.

Sadly I dont see women bf in public at all but like a pp says maybe they are being soo discreet.Sadly I think the real reason is that women are being made to feel ashamed to bf in public, or bf at all by the majority of people. So very sad.And highly offensive. The way I see it is men are encouraged to be bold, brash, proud of their bodies but women well we're made to feel ashamed of and disgruntled with our bodies unless we conform to the shaved,thin,'pretty',docile,subserviant, ever -ready for an oppressive version of sex, role-model. Oh and dont show any titty if bf. I will not allow society to dictate what I look like, how I think and how I view my sexuality, how much/little boob I expose when bf. Go breastfeeders!!!
post #9 of 127
Semi-related story: When my first was a newborn, we went to a wedding. I preferred nursing somewhere quiet then. Not because I felt the need for privacy, but because ds nursed better somewhere quiet. A male friend found me and came in to chat for a bit. Ds had been blissfully nursing to sleep in my arms and it wasn't until I took him off to burp him that my friend realized he'd been nursing. He said "I guess it's too late to be embarassed now, hey?" to which I replied "absolutely!".

I hadn't gone out of my way to be discreet, but he still couldn't tell. He'd assumed I'd been holding a sleeping baby.
post #10 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by pumpkinhead View Post
I do not think nursing covers are discreet. Yes, they help to cover exposed flesh, but nothing advertises "I am breastfeeding!" more than a nursing cover. However, if they empower a mother to nurse her babe and bring her confidence and comfort, this is a good thing.

Bottom line, I really look forward to living in a world where mothers can nurse their babies how they are most comfortable and no one will bat an eye either way.
Yeah, I agree about nursing covers. They SCREAM BFing to me. I agree too that people should be able to just do what they need to do without flack.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teenytoona View Post
I do think it's frustrating that people think it's acceptable if discreet. I cannot be discreet, I just can't. I think the bigger busted one is, the less possible discreetness is. People see it all. If I dont' have my shirt out of the way, I can't see what's going on, so it's all out there.

I for one am a proponent of do what you need to do and the other people can deal with it, but I know that it's a very difficult thing for many. So I guess I'm one of the ones who "just whip it out" but also hopefully to help normalize it.
I agree that you should be able to do whatever you need to do, but I have to disagree that being well-endowed makes it so people see everything when you nurse. I am very well-endowed, and it just means I wear a nursing shirt, and sometimes also a cardigan, to have all outside angles covered (especially when dealing with a distractable toddler). It is easier for people who have smaller chests (baby does cover the breast), but it is not THAT hard with an empire-waisted nursing shirt and cardigan even if a person has bountiful resevoirs. But it's okay if you want to "whip it out", I'm just saying you don't have to in order to make it work.

Tjej
post #11 of 127
With different women, different comfort levels, different body/breast types, there will always be varying degrees of discrescion. I'm an OTT nurser for the most part. My breasts are fairly small and I'm comfortable with this. I live in a very conservative state and in a conservative corner of the state, and yet I've never gotten a nasty look. Maybe I'm one of those in your face breastfeeders, although I can assure everyone it's because I don't like holding my shirt up and DS hates when my shirt falls in his face.

I want women to nurse however they need to to feel comfortable. If that means nursing capes, then that's fine with me.

However I do feel that nursing capes don't help the normalization of breastfeeding and I do think that they can set the expectation that less discreet bf'ers (like me) SHOULD use them or that we're trying to make a statement by not using them.

I think if more women practice in front of a mirror and nurse in public then others will feel more comfortble and nursing capes will go the way of the corsett.

Holding a sleeping/nursing toddler so I'm sure there are a ton of typos.
post #12 of 127
Very thought-provoking post!

A friend and I were just discussing this yesterday. I personally use a nursing cover because my baby is only 6 weeks old and still needs help latching on, and because his little head doesn't BEGIN to cover my massive boobs! And, frankly, I'm really not comfortable with anyone seeing either my breasts or my belly. But I don't really LIKE the cover -- I'm so envious of moms who can so easily nurse their little ones sans cover and look like they're just holding their babies!

That said, it would be nice if BFing moms could be sure people wouldn't freak out if their boob WAS exposed for some reason (baby pops off or whatever).
post #13 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tjej View Post
Yeah, I agree about nursing covers. They SCREAM BFing to me. I agree too that people should be able to just do what they need to do without flack.

I agree that you should be able to do whatever you need to do, but I have to disagree that being well-endowed makes it so people see everything when you nurse. I am very well-endowed, and it just means I wear a nursing shirt, and sometimes also a cardigan, to have all outside angles covered (especially when dealing with a distractable toddler). It is easier for people who have smaller chests (baby does cover the breast), but it is not THAT hard with an empire-waisted nursing shirt and cardigan even if a person has bountiful resevoirs. But it's okay if you want to "whip it out", I'm just saying you don't have to in order to make it work.

Tjej
I have to say, I have not found a way yet to nurse without showing just about everything, and not because I haven't tried. Maybe it's me, or something I'm doing "wrong", but I can't.

I have no shame in people seeing "stuff" when I nurse (although I obviously don't go out of my way to "exhibit" myself.) *When* I worry about someone seeing something, it's my belly I worry about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanveann View Post
Very thought-provoking post!

A friend and I were just discussing this yesterday. I personally use a nursing cover because my baby is only 6 weeks old and still needs help latching on, and because his little head doesn't BEGIN to cover my massive boobs! And, frankly, I'm really not comfortable with anyone seeing either my breasts or my belly. But I don't really LIKE the cover -- I'm so envious of moms who can so easily nurse their little ones sans cover and look like they're just holding their babies!

That said, it would be nice if BFing moms could be sure people wouldn't freak out if their boob WAS exposed for some reason (baby pops off or whatever).
I quoted you, and now I can't remember why.
post #14 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmcneal View Post
*When* I worry about someone seeing something, it's my belly I worry about.
this is what I am worried about too, I am destroying my bella band, I will have to get another one after the baby is born!

I love your "6 v 1/2 doz" My dad and I were having a similar conversion, but he thinks that women should 'just use a little blanket thing' Then we got into it I would never 'judge' a mother that covers unless it was obvious that the cover was in her way and she was doing it for others comfort.

I pitty the foo' that says something to me come my NIP time. I am sooo ready to pop out the other one just to be a pain.

I envy moms that have NIP down to an art! I take notes! Plus I think it give the nervous moms and pregnant women a roll model that they DON'T have to get both the ladies out just to breastfeed!
post #15 of 127
Indiscreet means different things to different people.

To some, indiscreet means seeing any flesh not normally displayed by a woman out in public (be it breast or belly or areola).

To others, it means seeing that nursing is happening in front of them - so for those individuals covering up with a blanket or cape is actually worse because they tend to make it clear that "SHE IS DOING *THAT* HERE".

My attitude - the former can be addressed with practice and personal comfort levels. I was a lot more blase about flesh exposure after my second child had nursed for a year, than I was with my first; combined with my very good ability to keep myself covered (learned how to latch/unlatch fast, wore appropriate clothing, figured out where to sit in public places to minimize accidental exposure, and acted totally relaxed).

The latter is about deep-seated issues with breastfeeding and women's bodies. I actually think that covers and such can help the NIP cause because it does make nursing more obvious, AND it gets rid of argument number 1 entirely- if using a blanket, someone cannot reasonably protest that they take offense due to skin exposure - it shows that their biggest issue is with breasts being used as they are intended - to feed babies.

Now, I stopped using blankets when my first was 3 or so months, mainly because he would pull it off his head, and I stopped feeling like I needed them. But I totally support women who feel more comfortable NIP by using them.

Because discretion can be a code word for hidden. Using a cover is not hiding - instead it is actually usually more visible than not using one.

My 2 cents.
post #16 of 127
I think discretion matters less when the act of breastfeeding is normalized. Meaning, if everyone thought all babies had to be breastfed to live, than not many would be put off seeing a boob or nipple or nursing babe. And then discretion would be suited to the mother's preference (just like I may be comfortable wearing short-shorts, someone else may not). Before formula existed, the average person would likely have been exposed to breastfeeding much more often since *every* mother nursed (barring complications that required wet-nurses, etc). And because you can't do one without the other, once the act of breastfeeding is normalized, so will the breast itself.

If more people thought about humans as a two hundred thousand year old race that only survived that long because of mother's milk, they might start to think of it as the biological norm. In the same vein as a fetus is gestated in the womb, a baby is nourished at the breast. Without getting into the ramifications of the introduction of formula, we as a society, lost the knowledge that not only is the breast best, but that the breast is normal. If on daytime TV there was a commercial supporting breastfeeding for every formula commercial, we would all see breastfeeding differently, and a lot more often!

Unfortunately, since the introduction of formula, a lot of damage was done, and most new moms don't even realize there was a time when the alternative didn't exist. You nursed your baby or your baby became malnourished, sickly, maybe even died. And it's my belief that the mothers who know (like us) that our breasts evolved to sustain a species, should do our best to normalize breastfeeding. And that includes discretion to our own comfort-level.

I personally have no problem showing top-of-boob to nurse in public, and I have no problem seeing mothers completely cover up. The mere fact women are nursing period does great things to reiterate the point that breastfeeding is normal, and there are many variations of normal!
post #17 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by hucklebearie View Post
I think discretion matters less when the act of breastfeeding is normalized. Meaning, if everyone thought all babies had to be breastfed to live, than not many would be put off seeing a boob or nipple or nursing babe. And then discretion would be suited to the mother's preference (just like I may be comfortable wearing short-shorts, someone else may not).
I've thought about this, reading the thread about Denny's. Obviously, I'm not in the US. Last night my young cousin and her DF (visiting from Sweden) took us out to dinner. We went to a local place, like a pub I suppose (with large screens showing the cricket game, serving a lot of beer served with large steaks and fries). I breastfed my11-month old DD maybe 4 or 5 times through-out the meal. Nobody seemed to notice, as usual I just got comments on how cute my DD is! Nor have my cousin or her DF commented, they seem to take it as totally normal that DD feeds anywhere, and everywhere, on the spur of the moment.

I'm quite modest, in that I don't like showing a lot of skin, however, my DD's right to feed overrides that. I will feed her on the train, in the Ergo, walking around the museum, racing to catch a train, at a café, on the floor of the shop DH works in (I was tired...), during music class... I usually wear a singlet with an open shirt over, so it is easy to pull down the singlet for access (but I have very tiny breasts, so not much is exposed). If people look at me closely, I'm sure they'll know I'm breastfeeding. But nobody ever says anything. Sometimes they smile. Very often they'll say something nice about the baby (or the Ergo, if I am wearing her in that). I'm not particularly discreet, I just don't want to show much !

After reading posts here I find myself concerned about whether I offend people, and wondering if I am "discreet".

Extended breastfeeding is unusual here, and I rarely see mums breastfeeding in public here (at music group, at people's houses, and at cafés, yes, but not otherwise). There are parents' rooms at a couple of places in town, where I sometimes see other breastfeeding mums, usually with very little babies. But breastfeeding in general is very supported. I think most mums are just comfortable - it is easier to feed at home, and they go everywhere in the car anyway, so they just go home when the child wants a feed. Most babies seem to wean between six months and a year anyway, and I am a weird mother, because I don't usually bring a snack for DD (unless we are staying out all day, or going out for dinner). If DD is hungry I breastfeed, while her little friends get crackers or purés.
post #18 of 127
I think another factor to consider is context. For example, I was once asked to cover by a flight attendant. Why? I was sitting next to an unaccompanied 11 or 12 year old boy. I could totally see his parents getting all up in arms had he seen anything - and I gave the FA the benefit of the doubt that that's where she was coming from (it seemed clear from her tone, etc).

Likewise, I'd cover in someone else's home if I wasn't close with them and they were obviously uncomfortable.

But as a general rule, I do not think any woman should feel obligated to be discreet in all NIP circumstances - not least of all because as others have pointed out, she'd have to be a mind reader to please all people at all times WRT this issue!
post #19 of 127
Aislin- Flesh/the human body is viewed differently in North America, and the US in particular. I have spent a fair bit of time in Europe and found that bodies and skin were/are just generally not "taboo" like they are in the US (and to some extent Canada). I think, in a way, it seems like Americans are almost a little uncomfortable in their own skin and project those feelings onto situations that involve skin.

I find that the difference between where I live on the West Coast of Canada and where I visit family in the Midwest US is HUGE too. There is stigma attached to bottles here, and there is stigma attached to the breast there. I am totally generalizing, but those ar the feelings I have gotten.

Tjej

ETA: I meant to say that I doubt if you are offending anyone where you are.
post #20 of 127
I have never understood why the burden of "not offending" is the nursing mom's responsibility. I mean if I'm offending you---then YOU'RE LOOKING AT MY BOOB. I mean, isn't a man who visits a prostitute just as guilty as the prostitute? On a nude beach, who is rude? The nude person or the gawker?The gawker is committing a vulgar act, if he watches long enough to become offended. I think perhaps the lactivists ought to think of a way to countersue the gawker---as your rights are removed so that s/he doesn't have to control himself.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Lactivism
Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › Let's Talk About "Discreet" and Lactivism