Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › another perspective on "discretion"
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

another perspective on "discretion" - Page 3

post #41 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by justJen View Post
(My friend Jess posted this discussion of "discretion" on our local parenting group and I found it intriguing and thought-provoking. She's given me permission to share it here. Jen)

Problem is, we're shooting ourselves in the foot. By using the big D, or dancing around it in any way by trying to prove how *modest* we are, by talking about how the baby covers up the breasts, reassuring them that nothing really shows and that they've probably seen a million cases of NIP and never noticed it...we're allowing them to define modesty and discretion. We're playing their game and agreeing with them that breasts should not be seen. We're selling out our fellow breastfeeders - the ones who are unhampered by silly social conditioning and don't feel self-conscious popping a breast over the neck of a tank top, or who just can't hide those 38Gs, or who inadvertently get exposed by a curious 8 month old taking a look around. It's even worse when the pro-NIP side starts to agree with the "just be prepared with a bottle or go to the bathroom!" side by speculating about the motives of the woman in the news story du jour. We weren't there, we aren't her. Assuming that she was trying to stir up a ruckus is blaming the victim.

So, I beg of you, can we please drop the discretion language and stand up for our fellow nursing mamas, no matter how they get the milk into their baby's mouths? (I'm not pointing any fingers, just asking if you'll join me in watching what we say.) When we use it, we allow the anti-NIP people to put us on the defensive and define the terms of the debate. Our bottom line should be this: babies have a right to food and comfort when and where they need it. How much of the breast is bared in the process should matter to no one but its owner. So let's stop talking about how discreet we are, ok?
Well said! And said much more eloquently than I could have. I'm just annoyed that we're letting this divide us who are for breastfeeding.
But I don't get how moms who think it's fine we're being told how to be modest don't understand that as long as someone else is defining modesty, we don't have rights. I'm not sure if that came out how I meant, I'm referring to a conversation with a friend locally, who has a 1 mo and hasn't been harrassed for BFing. I hope she isn't, but even if you are firm on what you want to do, when someone says something critical of you BFing, it is agonizing, IME

Quote:
Originally Posted by krystyn33 View Post
On the discretion issue, I am in agreement--we cannot define some styles of nursing as acceptable and others not. It is counterproductive to the goal of breastfeeding normalcy to draw this line. No one should be told how to nurse.

But I also think when we get into a "you are with me or against me" paradigm, we're hurting our cause. We need room for differences of opinion--an openness to various perspectives with compassionate understanding even when we disagree. Not easy, but I think the diplomatic tone of the OP here is a good start.
True, but in my case, I will not support a bill that is worse than no bill. I'd rather have no law than a law that opens moms up to being discriminated against. I am really wrestling with this and trying to find out what is best in the long run.

Quote:
Originally Posted by alllyssa View Post
Hi again,

I hope I'm not crossing "the line" again, but I keep getting the feeling like I'm being misunderstood. I'll try this one more time and then I think I'm done.

I just don't get this way of thinking. Do you (general) REALLY think that any way a mother chooses to breastfeed her baby is OK in public? What if she completely unbuttons her shirt? What if she took her shirt off completely? Is any way really OK with you (general)?

I appreciate this. I've definitely gotten the feeling that others on this board and their "all or nothing" point of view hurts the cause of normalizing breasteeding in general and in public specifically.
It would be somewhat disconcerting perhaps to see a woman completely unbutton her shirt, but I wouldn't spaz that my DH or children would see her doing what with breast they are designed for. ITU what the one gal was saying who had to have nothing in the way to nurse.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PiesandAbrosmama View Post
I get what your saying alllyssa- but i think the position is if we put conditions about how breastfeeding is done in public, then we are never really getting to the point that breastfeeding should be a zero issue. We don't normalize the breast as normal for nursing we continue to hide it, we continue to discourage mothers who feel they might not be discreet enough and therefore give up on breastfeeding all together, not worth the hassel or the babe just won't eat under a blanket.
It's like the "don't ask don't tell" law- it just doesn't work. by and large most women I know do not get naked or mostly naked to breastfeed, but the perception by many in public is that we do or we might so we have to hide the act and that is offensive. It's a cultural shift and change we are looking for that won't come by saying it has to be "respectful" because that can be to many things to to many people.
So though I'm not going to nurse with my shirt off- I'm also not going to tell you how or if your nursing is "right" or "wrong".
ITA. People are paranoid of what if *one* woman takes her shirt off, or as my friend said, "What if I'm I'm at the beach and a woman takes her swimsuit top off to nurse? I don't want my child to see that!" Um, well, if you're at the beach you're seeing a lot of skin already, why not for what breast are meant for? And sheesh, you're going to teach your child that no one should what breasts are really for?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hollyvangogh View Post
Of course the real irony is that while real, in person, women are told that to be decent and respectful they'd better cover up (no matter what they believe or how difficult covering makes BFing) it seems perfectly acceptable for 2D women on magazine covers to be 90% naked. Actually, even in every day real life it seems more acceptable for women to bare skin for a million reasons (warm weather, looking fashionable, attracting others, etc.) but not BFing. Heaven forbid we bare skin for *that!*

It does not make their reasons valid. That does not make it so that the rest of the world has to cater to their hangups.

Someone on MDC once made the point that people do *not* have a right to never be offended but babies and mamas certainly have a right to breastfeed!
Yup, but how to get people to *get* that? Everyone wants to hang onto their right be be offended.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hucklebearie View Post
The opposition has well formed ideas and logical (to them) reasons for being against nursing and NIP. Their voice is well represented in society. We owe it to every mom who chooses to give their baby the *best* start in life to support their choice and whatever means it takes to achieve their choice. When their peers and fellow moms (especially moms who bf) pick and choose what method of nursing is acceptable to them, we are fueling the fire of the opposition. There is no benefit to the child to say my way is decent and your way is not.

The more I read and think about this topic the more incensed I get and convinced of the idea that it is not men who undermine a nursing moms rights to bf, but women. I absolutely hold fast to the belief you are for me or against me. I think it is impossible to change the way society feels about or allows BF or NIP if we ourselves have such a huge divide of opinion. If a mom is smart enough to choose to feed her baby in the best way (from the breast) and is comfortable enough to NIP it in spite of the many obvious obstacles, we should be applauding her. Period. Regardless of our own hang ups, a nursing mom needs and deserves our support. If not for her sake than for the sake of her child.
United we stand, divided we fall.

Quote:
Originally Posted by krystyn33 View Post
There is a gap between what is essentially true (if you believe there is any essential truth/reality--philosophy minor here...) and what is socially constructed. Yes breasts have an intrinsic purpose that is not sexual. But for ages in mainstream American culture they have been highly sexualized--these perceptions and attitudes are not going to change overnight. While I am not saying we should cater to other people's potential discomfort and put blankets over our heads, I do not think that NIP with a reasonable (i.e. still putting baby's need first) amount of consideration for others should mean extradition from the lactivist club.

There's a difference in my personal take on this and my political take. Personally, the notion of a mom NIP greatly exposed on purpose with a *screw you* in your face attitude to anyone who might not like it--ready for a fight--doesn't strike me as productive to making NIP accepted or normalized. (A tiny minority of us I'm sure.) You catch more flies with honey, is my point there. BUT, politically I will support that mom's right to NIP without restrictions because I can't disentangle that from my right to NIP. Discretion is subjective and there are certainly folks who would think I am lacking and should sit facing a wall or use a blanket or a bottle or whatever. Lots of folks would find it disgusting that I was nursing a 2 year old. And discretion is not always under our control either--with squirmy-wormies or large breasts or the early days when latching on is challenging or whatever. We cannot place any formal qualifications or limitations on the right to NIP without shooting ourselves in the foot.

When DS was still a baby I had lunch with a fairly conservative friend who was not yet a mom. DS needed to nurse, and although I didn't need to (and would never want an official rule that I had to), I asked her if she would be uncomfortable if I nursed him. She blushed a little bit and said, "No, not at all," even though I could tell it felt a little awkward for her. Frankly, I'm not sure what I would have done if she said yes--maybe moved to a different booth, but I do believe that my consideration of her feelings prompted her acceptance of NIP. Respect given encouraged respect returned in kind. This is my general rule of thumb for relating with others in all aspects of my life. Now, some would think that makes me not a lactivist, but frankly I think she is more likely to be open to NIP herself in the future than she would have if my attitude had been who cares if you feel awkward--this is my right so deal with it.

And yes, NIP and the over-sexualization of breasts is an important issue, but I'm not sure it causes the poor BFing success rates as much as lack of paid maternity leave, lack of adequate time/space for pumping in the workplace, poor birth and hospital practices, bad advice from uninformed doctors and other medical professionals, lack of postnatal support and care in general, and so on. There's a lot of work to be done and many ways we can act as lactivists--we don't all need to think alike and have the same methods.
ITA with your last paragraph. It's a host of issues, but right now for me, the modesty/discreet issue is dividing lactivists. So, I'm going to start a spin-off.
[QUOTE=PiesandAbrosmama;13280625]
Quote:
Originally Posted by hollyvangogh View Post
I don't go around telling BFing moms who do cover that they need to "respect" me by doing things my way and uncovering so my daughter can grow up seeing BF as a regular and wonderful thing. I "respect" them by letting THEM decide what's best for them and their family.
Can I say I feel bad when they are at a moms' only group, and they feel like they have to use a blanket or hooter hider? I mean, really, if we're all women, who cares, why should anyone be bothered? I never say anything, but I feel bad for them.

How much easier would breastfeeding be if we could call a mom who's a friend who's nursed and say, "Can I watch your child latch on? I'm having a hard time." We don't have a breastfeeding culture; we don't have good help from nurses/LCs/drs. I think this would make a difference for some women who didn't know they were having problems nursing or couldn't get good help.

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_lissa View Post
It is definitely societal rather than human nature, or it would be the same across every society and it is not.
I remember reading about one culture where men who like breasts are ridiculed. While I do believe that God did make man to appreciate his wife's breasts, I think if our Western culture were altogether more comfortable with our bodies it wouldn't be an issue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sagesgirl View Post
None of this changes the fact that their primary purpose--designed as such by God or by millions of years of evolution, take your pick--is to nourish younglings. Frootloop/Dee is right--if a person cannot separate breastfeeding from sex, that's their problem. Not mine.
Yup and yup!
post #42 of 51
I can understand that this sort of division among nursing moms can undermine legislation efforts. And I stand firmly by my assertion that any legislation must remain free of a discretion clause.

But under the umbrella of lactivism as a movement in general, we need to be open to critical inquiry and dialogue--to listen to one another, respectfully, even when we disagree.

The "you are either my enemy or my friend" dynamic does nothing to invite those who disagree with you to actually consider your argument. For example: yes, the culture at large needs to "get over" sexual hang-ups about breasts and BFing. But think about how you feel when someone says to you, "You are wrong--get over it!" Are you willing to listen to anything they have to say? Open to look at the situation from another perspective? Who would be?

I'm not saying we capitulate or compromise NIP rights. But attitude makes a huge difference. If you want someone to listen to you, try listening to them--openly, and validating their feelings--meeting them where they are at and starting from there. When people feel attacked, they withdraw, and we won't win anyone over that way. Diplomacy over war, is all I'm saying.
post #43 of 51
Wouldn't it be better to deal with "attention grabbers" who "only expose so much breast to get a rise out of people" by ignoring them? See, that's what I don't get, rewarding supposed attention grabbing behavior by making a huge fuss about about how "she's an attention w**re" instead of doing nothing or just going "aww lookit the cute baby!"
post #44 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by PassionateWriter View Post
uh, man men's nipples are sexual organs to them also. i have know many of these men (friends/partners, etc. etc.). so, should we separate men who get sexual enjoyment out of their nipples from those who dont (met them too)...those who do must wear shirts..those who dont can be shirtless?
And I, and many other women, don't get sexual enjoyment from our nipples--so do we get to go shirtless?
post #45 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by hucklebearie View Post
There is no benefit to the child to say my way is decent and your way is not.

The more I read and think about this topic the more incensed I get and convinced of the idea that it is not men who undermine a nursing moms rights to bf, but women. I absolutely hold fast to the belief you are for me or against me. I think it is impossible to change the way society feels about or allows BF or NIP if we ourselves have such a huge divide of opinion. If a mom is smart enough to choose to feed her baby in the best way (from the breast) and is comfortable enough to NIP it in spite of the many obvious obstacles, we should be applauding her. Period. Regardless of our own hang ups, a nursing mom needs and deserves our support. If not for her sake than for the sake of her child.
It is absolutely Women. You are absolutely 100% correct. I dont think Men would even give it a thought. It is because of the reaction of the women around them that "teaches" them how to feel about it. Their mothers, Aunts, Grandmothers, Sisters, had a reaction small or large, outloud or silent, for or against..... every time he was been "exposed" to BFing growing up ---he learns the "right" response to have from them. And then we have our own effect on them with our reactions. My DP's opinion on the matter is "you're (Women) the one with Boobs, you(Women) decide what to do with them". We need to be ok with breastfeeding. Not just for ourselves, not just for our "way", but with ANY way of ANY breastfeeding.

My personal lesson with this......I remember seeing a woman NIP and her entire breast was out, and she had nice large areola's like my own. You could absolutely see everything, right down to the great latch the baby had. I should have smiled and kept shopping. Instead, I turned away flustered.

Why? WHY?? I have always considered myself a "lactivist". I think I am very pro bf ing. I DO believe its normal. Why did it bother me? After some soul searching, I believe it bothered me because DP was right next to me and I was uncomfortable knowing HE could see another womans breast. My own insecurity. ANd in retrospect, what other more acceptable way could DP be "exposed" to another womans breast? He got to see a NORMAL breast ( not some pointed up at her nose airbrushed silicone kind) and he got to see it used for its NORMAL purpose..... Why was I not jumping for joy!?

I have made an effort to casually thank every mom NIP that I have seen since. I know I'm not alone in learning this lesson. I have heard stories about other women not wanting their fathers, brothers, husbands etc to see another woman nursing. It's our own insecurity with what society has determined "acceptable breast policy" and some havent done the "work" to get thru it yet.
post #46 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by sg784 View Post
After some soul searching, I believe it bothered me because DP was right next to me and I was uncomfortable knowing HE could see another womans breast. My own insecurity.
sg784, thanks so much for sharing this very thoughtful and honest experience.

I know I have often encountered a gap between my reasoned, chosen beliefs/values and my gut-level knee-jerk reactions -- not related to breastfeeding, perhaps, but other stuff. I chalk it up to the power of socialization. Unlearning oppression comes more easily to the mind than to the heart and body, I think.

As a feminist, I find it helpful to recognize that women often are the ones doing patriarchy's dirty work -- oppressing one another more directly than men do in certain realms. The classic example of this idea is footbinding in premodern China, which harmed women terribly to the benefit of privileged men, but which was actually inflicted on little girls not by their fathers but by their mothers.

I think instances of women opposing NIP can fit this same model. Discrimination against breastfeeding mothers helps to keep the public arena normatively masculine, as well as reinforcing patriarchal values on women's bodies (e.g. breasts exist for adult male sexual pleasure), and yet it often is women who carry out the "policing" of public space -- doing patriarchy's dirty work for it.

I see this as part of the tragedy of being female under patriarchy -- everyone accommodates the system to some extent, for her own survival or her own benefit -- and it helps me have compassion for my own "feminist shortcomings" as well as for others'.
post #47 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by songbh View Post
As a feminist, I find it helpful to recognize that women often are the ones doing patriarchy's dirty work -- oppressing one another more directly than men do in certain realms.

I agree. That's why the "you're with me or against me" rhetoric bothers me so much. "The Master's tools will never dismantle the Master's house." --Audre Lorde

Right/Wrong; Us/Them; Breast/bottle; Discrete/indiscrete; Mama Milk/formula

I support a lactivist paradigm which moves beyond patriarchal, either/or thinking. We can be inclusive and compassionate and still be strong.
post #48 of 51
Songbh, I also agree with you. But I think it's okay to be very clear that not all of us are going to play the game and if you do play you are being anti-woman and anti-breastfeeding. I am okay with division when it makes sense and I am not much for sugar coating when it involves my rights as a mother. Sexism especially when it involves my child's right to eat is not something I can sweet talk about. If you can I think that's great but yet again let's not try to tell others how they should be reacting ect. You (very general terms) might think the only way to change is through gentle and understanding education but I don't agree and that's okay because true change takes many approaches.
post #49 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by krystyn33 View Post
I agree. That's why the "you're with me or against me" rhetoric bothers me so much. "The Master's tools will never dismantle the Master's house." --Audre Lorde

Right/Wrong; Us/Them; Breast/bottle; Discrete/indiscrete; Mama Milk/formula

I support a lactivist paradigm which moves beyond patriarchal, either/or thinking. We can be inclusive and compassionate and still be strong.
I will tell you what my perspective is personally regarding the you're with me or against me "rhetoric". "You are with me", you accept all forms of discretion as a woman's right and support a woman's right to choose how to feed her child in any way she sees fit....or...."you are against me", you choose to define discretion in such a way you find more acceptable, more appropriate thereby furthering the notion that your way is inherently better and consequently that my way is wrong.

I find no place for arbitrary rules on discretion within my personal lactivistic perspective. I believe it plays only a negative role within the context of nursing and NIP advocacy.
post #50 of 51
this is where discretion while nip is not a priority for me. my main concern is to breastfeed my baby as his needs come before someone who may be offended. i will not try to concern myself with other peoples hangups. if someone feels they need to be discreet in public than more power to them. i choose not to cover up as it is not comfortable for my baby and me.
post #51 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by songbh View Post
As a feminist, I find it helpful to recognize that women often are the ones doing patriarchy's dirty work -- oppressing one another more directly than men do in certain realms. The classic example of this idea is footbinding in premodern China, which harmed women terribly to the benefit of privileged men, but which was actually inflicted on little girls not by their fathers but by their mothers. .
I can think of another example. Men now have women who will put out w/o the men having to pay out. When pregnancy results, the men don't have to pay out then either! Because feminists are all for 'choice'. Seems like the patriarchy always comes out ahead -- esp. when it tricks the matriarchy to HELP.

We're all doin' in our own sisters.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Lactivism
Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › another perspective on "discretion"