I've always been told I have a cervix that's really far back, even pre-preg., but no one's ever told me if it's a good thing or bad. My MW is still making the comment every time they do an internal, but I'm too busy grimacing in pain to ask her what it means.
I'm imagining that with the internal checks being as painful as they are now (feels like the MWs have to jam their hands in there all the way to their elbows to feel anything), they're going to be even more miserable during labor. I've already asked to keep internal checks to a minimum because I'm scared of how painful they're going to get. They're saying I'm soft and shortening, and that they can feel the baby's head. I'm assuming if it was a really bad thing, they would have mentioned it more than they already have, but I'm just curious.
I can't seem to word it correctly enough on Google to get good search results. Has anyone else had issues with a cervix that was far back? Does it effect labor or birth any differently?
I'm imagining that with the internal checks being as painful as they are now (feels like the MWs have to jam their hands in there all the way to their elbows to feel anything), they're going to be even more miserable during labor. I've already asked to keep internal checks to a minimum because I'm scared of how painful they're going to get. They're saying I'm soft and shortening, and that they can feel the baby's head. I'm assuming if it was a really bad thing, they would have mentioned it more than they already have, but I'm just curious.
I can't seem to word it correctly enough on Google to get good search results. Has anyone else had issues with a cervix that was far back? Does it effect labor or birth any differently?





Follow Mothering