I really love the idea of the 10 toys tribe and although I don't think we can quite approach that level of austerity, I would like to get as close as possible. After keeping things very basic during the baby years and tossing most of the plastic crap given to us as gifts last year, I am now trying to build my 2 year-old son's toy collection mostly from scratch. I have a 12 cubby storage shelf in his room and I would like to keep things pretty much limited to what will fit there aside from his homemade play kitchen and train table which are elsewhere in the house.
In addition to the philosophical there are a couple of practical reasons I want to keep it minimal. One is that we are a military family and move frequently. We are hoping for another overseas posting and I don't want my son to get used to having tons and tons of toys that we have to drag around, and in many places getting new ones will be expensive/inconvenient.
Second - I am trying to invest mostly in quality wooden toys that are open ended, appeal to a wide age range, and will last a long time. These are expensive. When you're buying expensive handmade toys you just don't have the money to have extra toys waiting in the garage for the monthly toy rotation. I guess this is a bit of a chicken-or-egg issue: I want fewer toys, which means the toys have to "work harder" which means I have to buy good ones, etc.
So I guess my main question is: I know things like blocks or a dollhouse or a train set can appeal to kids from age 2-12, but do your kids get bored playing with the same toy for a decade? Do they grow more attached to it? I have this notion that with fewer, but higher quality toys my son will develop a great imagination and really get creative. My nightmare, however, is that as he grows he'll get sick of the same stuff and start begging for more or just being bored.
Other suggestions on how to keep the same old toys fresh and interesting?
In addition to the philosophical there are a couple of practical reasons I want to keep it minimal. One is that we are a military family and move frequently. We are hoping for another overseas posting and I don't want my son to get used to having tons and tons of toys that we have to drag around, and in many places getting new ones will be expensive/inconvenient.
Second - I am trying to invest mostly in quality wooden toys that are open ended, appeal to a wide age range, and will last a long time. These are expensive. When you're buying expensive handmade toys you just don't have the money to have extra toys waiting in the garage for the monthly toy rotation. I guess this is a bit of a chicken-or-egg issue: I want fewer toys, which means the toys have to "work harder" which means I have to buy good ones, etc.
So I guess my main question is: I know things like blocks or a dollhouse or a train set can appeal to kids from age 2-12, but do your kids get bored playing with the same toy for a decade? Do they grow more attached to it? I have this notion that with fewer, but higher quality toys my son will develop a great imagination and really get creative. My nightmare, however, is that as he grows he'll get sick of the same stuff and start begging for more or just being bored.
Other suggestions on how to keep the same old toys fresh and interesting?









:

but all the stuff I liked(wooden trains,bean bags,tops,etc..)were just sitting there as clutter.