I've started tracking my cycle (physical signs but not BBT, though I may start that soon) only fairly recently. In the 8 cycles I've tracked, the lengths have varied from 23 to 28 days. I'm not worried about variance per se, but does 23 days seem abnormally short? Also, how much variance is normal - is it usually just a day or two, or is five day variance still typical?
Also, some cycles seem to include no discernable fertility signs (I should start the BBT for that reason I guess). My last cycle had no noticeable CM or anything else that suggested I was fertile. The cycle before that, on the other hand, on day 11 I had tons of eggwhite, was majorly horny (lol), secreted pheremones during IC with DH, was extremely crazy sensitive to odors that I usually never even detected, felt just overall "strange" and had mittelschmerz around 2am that night.
Is that strange, to have such variation in cycles, not only in length but also intensity of fertility signs?
I am just tracking my fertility signs to learn more about myself, not as a means of birth control, btw. We use a barrier method (you could probably guess with this variance I'm not on anything hormonal).
Also, some cycles seem to include no discernable fertility signs (I should start the BBT for that reason I guess). My last cycle had no noticeable CM or anything else that suggested I was fertile. The cycle before that, on the other hand, on day 11 I had tons of eggwhite, was majorly horny (lol), secreted pheremones during IC with DH, was extremely crazy sensitive to odors that I usually never even detected, felt just overall "strange" and had mittelschmerz around 2am that night.
Is that strange, to have such variation in cycles, not only in length but also intensity of fertility signs?
I am just tracking my fertility signs to learn more about myself, not as a means of birth control, btw. We use a barrier method (you could probably guess with this variance I'm not on anything hormonal).







.