"Control groups" and "placebos"

[runes]

Prevnar IS Safe, Have a Look at the Studies!

Wow, I'm just a mom, but that is NOT my idea of control groups and placebos.

Most of the safety data on Prevnar is based on a study comparing one new vaccine, Prevnar with an experimental vaccine, “investigational group C meningococcal conjugate”.

[kiara7]

Oh yes, vaxes are very special - no one actually gets a true placebo. They either get the old vax or aluminum or ..........

Naturally, the number of adverse events is not so bad in comparison. Can you imagine what it would look like with a true placebo?:

[Spectrolite]

I haven't looked much into this myself yet, so i myself haven't got much to say!
(Although right now it seems very strange to me...)


But Science Mom made a comparison of vaccine testing to automobile testing in an old thread, and someone was thrilled with how her analogy made clear sense. It was past midnight when I read it, so it never really registered!!
You might want to do a search.

[emma1325]

But everyone knows that if you study chocolate chip cookies vs. peanut butter chip cookies and find no difference in blood sugar, this means cookies have no effect on blood sugar!

[Th1Th2]

The use of safety data on vaccines is a misnomer. It actually refers to toxicology data and part of vaccine manufacturing is pre-clinical toxicology testing. Therefore any arguments that defends the safety of vaccines in humans is useless especially when vaccines are classified as biological hazards under Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS).

Biological hazards (biohazards, biohazardous materials) are exempt from coverage under the HCS if the only hazard they pose is biological. However, if the material also possesses physical or health hazard, then an MSDS is required.

Examples of biohazards include microbes, anthrax, vaccines, and cell cultures.

So, let's eat cookies, they are delicious.