Mothering › Forums › Health › Vaccinations › MMR more effective if delayed?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

MMR more effective if delayed?

post #1 of 2
Thread Starter 
Dr Sears states that the efficacy of MMR works better if the shot is delayed, ie. to 4 or so. Does anyone know what the basis (which studies) is for this claim? I am aware of a study showing not enough immunity after one dose and hence why they moved to two MMR.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...37871f1f0310ba

Quote:
2–4 years after receiving a first dose of MMR vaccine at age 12–18 months, it was found that a large proportion of pre-school children had measles (19.5%) and mumps (23.4%) IgG antibody below the putative level of protection.
but then this..


Quote:
The proportion measles antibody negative (but not rubella or mumps) was significantly higher in children vaccinated at 12 months of age than at 13–17 months.
post #2 of 2
I have read studies that showed MMR was more effective at 15 months as opposed to 12 months or younger, but never anything about delaying to 4yo? I would be interested too if anyone has a link.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Vaccinations
Mothering › Forums › Health › Vaccinations › MMR more effective if delayed?