Quote:
Originally Posted by Deborah  They are appealing. I'm not sure who they appeal too. But I think they make a good case for Michelle having been treated unfairly because she was the lead case. Read the beginning of the appeal (but skip all the headings and legalese), it lays out the justification.
|
I still can't believe people thought this case would turn out any different. As a child, I read Solzhenitsyn's Gulag Archipelago and to this day recall the ridiculous courts in the Soviet Union that sent political dissenters off to Siberia forever. These poor people were done for long before they stepped into the "court of law."
Just the fact that they set up this special court to hear this case says it all. It's absurd. A federal court run by a specifically chosen individual (specifically chosen by the federal government) is supposed to determine if a federal department is guilty of the maiming of thousands of children? C'mon. Seriously?
Again, I had to look at what they said about Bustin's testimony and how he couldn't really prove anything wrong. He was just mad he couldn't prove it wrong, so he came up with a bunch of maybe's and somehow that became proof. They throw all this is in at the last moment with no chance to respond and that's fair?
The defense's entire case is full of stuff like that. There will be a judgment day for these people and God have mercy on their souls.
