It is always wrong to hit other people and living things. Physical violence is always wrong.
I wasn't spanked and that is pretty much why I don't!
I wasn't spanked and that is pretty much why I don't!
|
I remember my mother trying to spank me when I was 16 (yes, SIXTEEN YEARS OLD) over an argument we were having. Of course, by 16 (and as an athlete) I was a bit stronger than her, so it's no surprise that it didn't scare me, I just laughed at her. How horrible it must have been for her to have no other tools in her parenting toolbox at that point. If she had been looking for other ways of solving problems all those years she might have been a pro at it...
|
|
Spanking is a weaker discipline method. Its not that is doesn't work. It can. For a short time but just because hitting a small child makes them compliant doesn't mean you should use that method as a strategy.
Spanking is a short term way of dealing with behaviour and it uses a parents physical dominance to scare a child into behaving. There are many ways to deal with child behaviour without spanking. If you need to use spanking to control your child, you need to research some more strategies and tools to help you in challenging situations. To say that hitting someone is the only way you can discipline a strong willed person is ridiculous. How do you think people control and discilpine highschool students or jail in mates? They dont go around giving them light taps on the bum *rolls eyes* and, despite what you might think, they dont use fear either. Using fear as a punishment method causes resentment and future violence. It quickly spirals out of control. Think of your favourite highschool teacher? Was the classroom out of control? Did they threaten the students with violence, punishment and fear? No? Then why parent that way? If a teacher can control 30 students, we can find ways to gain respect and control of our own children - and we can do it without resorting to hitting, screaming at or scaring them. |

|
The reasoning that teachers don't hit kids but can keep an entire class under control (sort of) has been in the back of my mind and I'm glad it was brought up in this thread. I am a teacher, and I have a huge bag of tricks for keeping students engaged and "in control." Being positive, proactive and setting clear boundaries and expectations are hugh contributors to a successful classroom. Also understanding what is developmentally appropriate helps keep the expectations reasonable. If it works at school (usually works,) then it should work at home. We also try to use positive reinforcement and specific praise.
|
|
That's awesome! Hopefully you are reaching out to children on their path to success! I really support teachers, and anyone in the education field. It's a hard job, and there's not a lot of glitz and fame in association with it. Yet, there should be.. teachers are one of our most valuable assets in America.
|

|
I have no doubt that this won't be the last time something like this happens - but I think showing kids our real actions and the real reasons why things happen is more important than being "the boss." (even though, I like to think I am)
Does that make sense? |
:
|
But coming from a teenage point of view (as I did this a lot) she never said she was staying at the Y. She simply asked if she could hang out with some friends a bit longer; it's not her fault you didn't ask where
:Really, though this is the same thing as saying "Can I go to Jenny's party?" "Sure. Her parents will be there right" "Jenny's parents would never allow her to have a party without their presence" ... which would explain why Jenny's parents don't know about the party ... |




|
Oh, I just thought of this. Do you really have a 15 year old daughter who doesn't have a cell phone? Because that's really a feat. And congrats on that one. (I ask, because if she had one, wouldn't you have just been able to call her cell asking where she was when you were worried? )
|




Follow Mothering