Info need!!

[isabchi]

One of my friends said the having sex with a circumcised men is more pleasured for women that with uncircumcised one. That's true?....
She's probably pushed to her uncircumcised 16 yo.DS to circumcise in the future...:

[foreskin friendly]

I have to ask a serious question to understand your post...


Is she talking about first hand experience?? Or ONLY what she's heard?

[isabchi]

She's talking for her first hand experience. So sad I don't hand first hand experience myself to make my own argument, because I'm only have experience with uncircumcised ones. She also said that circumcised men are more clean. That argument is something that I not agree at all..:

[foreskin friendly]

It seems like she never was in a neutral place...in order to make a truly unbiased decision about what she thought of an intact sexual experience...

Maybe she is exploiting her own experience (because she's been fortunate to have been with an intact man-and maybe most of her friends haven't...) to fit her own preconceived notions... and knows that many woman haven't had the experience so they can't give a true opinion about comparing one to the other...

Maybe she just honestly enjoyed the circumcised men more-but I would gather that must have a lot to do with what has already obviously been ingrained in her psyche (intact is dirty)...

(I mean, I certainly don't think I would be able to ALLOW myself to thoroughly enjoy anything sexual with someone I thought was unclean!)

BUT.. do you really know that she has had experience with an intact man (men)? Or is it just something she's throwing out there as a support to her "I know better than most people" stance...?

hmmm....

[isabchi]

Her ex-husband is intact (was her first and only for about 20 years). After the divorce she's been just with circumcised men.
I'll been talking with her about circumcision is a mutilation and she said, on this particular issue she's foolish. She's think in her own pleasure.That she's definitely prefer a circumcised one. I'm a little scare that she'll pusher her son through get circumcise.

[Rico'sAlice]

I think she needs to consider that maybe the difference is her age, the thrill of new relationships, possibly these men are more skilled than her ex, etc.

[isabchi]

Originally Posted by Rico'sAlice

I think she needs to consider that maybe the difference is her age, the thrill of new relationships, possibly these men are more skilled than her ex, etc.

:

Help me to understand!...Why people said intacts are dirty?. For me point of view, looks that probably the opposite. Circumcised men are more exposed...????

[isabchi]

I just come to home, and She just washed the video from Penn & Teller. She just posted in facebook, she is pro circ...
I just have to let it go.....

[PolarMommy]

Hi,
I have had experience with both, and technically speaking I prefer intact without a doubt. But overall there are so many things factoring into intimacy (feelings, relationships, circumstances), that just this one issue is not going to be THE deciding factor. What I mean is, your friend divorced this guy, of course she'll never say he was the best thing ever, and maybe he wasn't for a miriad of reasons. His organ however is likely not to be blamed either way....

[karika]

i would not circumsize if i had a boy either. i have lived with two intact men in my life. there was something about it. my best experience came form a circ one, but that was due to so many other factors... but the sensations of intact are somehow better. as for the dirty part, to be honest, both of the men i knew were clean, nice men, but there was always a 'funk' there. not too bad, like how it is for us women being shut up in our clothes, but it is there. i still prefer intact. wet rag by the bed to rinse both of us off and away we go....

[tlh]

Show her these


http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html


http://www.cirp.org/library/sex_function/bensley1/

[eepster]

So, basically she's been with two guys, one intact and one circ.

My guess is that the circ guy just happens to be a really good lover for some reason unrelated to his lack of foreskin. Her ex might just have been a lousely lover, even though he had a anatomical advatage.

What goes into making a good lover is so, so complex...there is timing, gentleness, compatibilty, understanding of female anatomy, personal preferences, chemistry, etc, etc....

I've been with a few guys, and believe me they vary greatly in their skill levels one to the next even when they all have the same circ status.

[Greg B]

Even when studies are done, the results are mixed. For example, Sex as Nature Intended reports a mixed preference. This supports the old saying that the brain is the biggest sex organ we have.

So the point should be that sexual feelings cannot be the only factor to consider when discussing whether circumcision is a good decision or not.

Regards

Edited to add that I was circumcised and am now restoring. I have progressed far enough to get substantial benefits in sexual function and feelings for both my wife and me. My wife had only had experience with circumcised men before I restored. She now much prefers me restored.

[SleeplessMommy]

The decision should not be just about "what women prefer" ... women from Europe expect their men to be intact. Many women in the USA, including myself , prefer intact.

But what about the male experience of sex? The foreskin contains 20,000 nerve endings. The Sorrells Fine Touch Study link showed that the most sensitive part of a circumcised penis is the circumcision scar.