Also, if you want to make it easy, do a literature search on the acellular vaccine and if it promotes phagocytosis. It doesn't. It should, but it just doesn't, and no one knows why.
Also:
http://iai.asm.org/cgi/reprint/58/10/3445
There's also a weirdo "original antigenic sin" thing the vaccine does:
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi...10.1086/381204
Immunity to ACT is very important for clearance of pertussis. That the vax impares the ability to form immunity to that toxin is disturbing, to say the least.
Also:
http://iai.asm.org/cgi/reprint/58/10/3445
Quote:
| This is consistent with animal experiments which suggest that adhesins not targeted by the vaccine may permit a bit of colonization and that neutralization of pertussis toxin would limit the severity of the disease but would not have an impact on the initial stages of infection. |
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi...10.1086/381204
Quote:
| Of particular interest is the lack of a significant ACT antibody response in children for whom the DTP or DTaP vaccines failed. This induced tolerance is intriguing and may be due to the phenomenon called “original antigenic sin” |







: That has stuck with me since I first read about it...it has some notable implications for the pertussis vaccine program...





I was surprised that I didn't get asked if I wanted the shot before I left the hospital, but I had my daughter in Nov 07, so maybe there wasn't a huge campaign yet. Because I gave birth at the hospital that I work at and at my last yearly "physical" (about 2 or 3 months ago) I was pretty much yelled at by the nurse for refusing the shot and she told me she wasn't sure if I could work in patient care area's (I'm an x-ray tech...pretty high patient care
) if I didn't get the shot