Quote:
Originally Posted by medusaatemydog 
i have to say something about this 35,000 number of flu deaths... these numbers represent deaths that are flu -related... not neccesarily the flu itself killed these people.
|
I hear you on your post, but I don't like separating flu related from flu. Whether these are CASES or DEATHS is good to ferret out. But even if they are flu-related, I count that as flu itself. I mean if it weren't for the flu, then the complications or related problems might not have happened. And if someone had underlying conditions first and got the flu, flu still would have been the ultimate cause of death if the person died. Separating it to me is like saying the concussion Jane Doe dies of that she sustained in the car accident was the cause of death, not the accident. But if it weren't for the accident, the concussion would never have happened.
When someone is ill, and flu is present in addition to other illnesses (ie, pneumonia), it's pretty hard to draw a straight line down the middle. The Texas boy's death is sad, and taking 'comfort' in the fact that he seems to have had a pre-existing condition that perhaps made him more vulnerable to the flu as there have been no other confirmed US death's doesn't still negate the fact that in the end, flu was what led to his death.
(off to check out the other thread under Health)