Quote:
Originally Posted by MittensKittens 
Well... I would like some help on that one too, because I might be missing something, and if that is the case, I would certainly be very interested in some new reading material. Perhaps even mentioning those I was thinking of might be controversial but indeed, they are the only philosophers I can think of who are not misogynist - Marx and Engels.
|
Hmm, Engels was the one who wrote about the origin of women's subjugation being in non-communist society, right?
Yes, here we go. I knew there had to be some dirt.
This article is rather trite but notifies us of the unsurprising fact that Engels behaved just like every other 19th century man with money

I don't know much about Marx, though I do know that in the days of Communist revolutions women's rights were explicitly sidelined as irrelevant: when class-based oppression ceased, then so would sex-based oppression, automatically.
Also, I don't like the Communist emphasis on work outside the home as the path to equality for all. I think that that's just the other side of the patriarchal/protestant work ethic coin. I mean, if your meaning in life is based on work, how is that inherently against anything in a patriarchal/capitalist society? Where is the emphasis on home life? On love, friendship, intuitive knowing, respect for nature, balance, emotional health, etc. etc. all the things that patriarchal society gives women responsibility for and then reviles?
I don't know if that's Marx though, since I've only actually read excerpts of him

Though I do remember being struck by how little he seemed to differ in his basic attitude about the world from other men of his time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1littlebit 
what i don't get is the perspective of some people (feminists included) that consider some of my beliefs and practices anti feminist. i am a SAHM b/c i choose to be... but some people think this is an insult to feminists... huh? i have a choice... i made my choice... thats the point of feminism IMO. I don't understand why some people consider not using birth control, opting for out of hospital or drug free births, SAHMing, extended BFing etc. anti feminist. i actually think that birth is a huge feminist issue and anyone who believes advocating for our right to birth at home, vaginally, with our intervention etc as anti feminist is totally missing the point.
same for extended BFing, AP, and other things that 'tie me down' ... i see these as huge women's rights issues... the right to NIP, pump at work, extended maternity leave etc are not demeaning to women... at least IMHO they are empowering, and they are choices we should have the right to make. what do you all think?
|
Totally agree!
Quote:
Originally Posted by MittensKittens 
I absolutely agree. The right to self determination includes the right to stay at home with your children, of course. It wouldn't be a choice if you HAD TO work outside the home, right? Unfortunately, deciding to be a SAHM seems to be something that is met with an awful lot of resistance today, and I personally see that as something that is going to turn into a feminist issue.
Birth rights are so very important to me, especially after my recent experiences with the lack of them. I had a UC, and was told by SO MANY PEOPLE that I should have "just gone to the hospital" like "normal women" do. I had huge trouble getting the birth certificate. In fact, I still don't have it but it should be OK now. My lawyer told me that "the fact you gave birth outside the hospital is something that hugely irritates everyone". Outside of the hospital, like giving birth in a hospital is the default. I won't bore you with the whole story but it was horrible. Not quite as horrible as a hospital would have been though. I think that birth is one of the big feminist issues, but one that has been largely left behind by feminism, until recently.
|
So true. Glad to hear that your legal situation is looking up, btw!
Follow Mothering