Just airin' my view...
We're parents of one and want to stay parents of one. For me, there are many -- well, to me -- silly-sounding reasons to have two:
1. "They'll have someone to play with."
This is no guarantee. You might just as well say, "They'll have someone to hate and resent as an intrusion." Maybe so, maybe no, but no child should be brought into the world as a kind of plaything or brought into the world with the built-in obligation of being friends with someone he or she may be very different from.
2. "Everyone's telling us we should."
"Nuff said.
Reasons that sound pretty valid to me:
1. So they won't be alone for the death of a parent -- but I'd like to add that there's no guarantee other sibs will be supportive.
2. The older child genuinely wants one and really knows and understands the ramifications of what s/he's asking (well, as well as can be expected).
Ultimately, we don't think we could possibly give #2 the attention we gave #1 -- an automatic unfairness to #2 as well as to #1, whose current 100% supply of parental attention would be seriously curtailed.
Good luck w/ your decision.
We're parents of one and want to stay parents of one. For me, there are many -- well, to me -- silly-sounding reasons to have two:
1. "They'll have someone to play with."
This is no guarantee. You might just as well say, "They'll have someone to hate and resent as an intrusion." Maybe so, maybe no, but no child should be brought into the world as a kind of plaything or brought into the world with the built-in obligation of being friends with someone he or she may be very different from.
2. "Everyone's telling us we should."
"Nuff said.
Reasons that sound pretty valid to me:
1. So they won't be alone for the death of a parent -- but I'd like to add that there's no guarantee other sibs will be supportive.
2. The older child genuinely wants one and really knows and understands the ramifications of what s/he's asking (well, as well as can be expected).
Ultimately, we don't think we could possibly give #2 the attention we gave #1 -- an automatic unfairness to #2 as well as to #1, whose current 100% supply of parental attention would be seriously curtailed.
Good luck w/ your decision.







