I hope that this post is acceptable by the UA.
I love the Dr. Sears books and I credit his books with helping me to become anti-circ. I read his parts on circ while pregnant with my daughter and she wouldn't have been circ'ed had she been a boy. I'm so thankful that even though Dr. Sears is clearly not 100% anti-circ, he does a reasonably good job of helping people see that it is unnecessary.
I am concerned however, about some of the misleading information found in the parts of his books that I read. Specifically what comes to mind is his statement that 90% of boys are retractable by age 3.
Does anybody know if some of his more recent books have more updated information? If they don't, would it be wise to contact him? How would it be best to go about it? Like I said, I really like his books and I'm not trying to bash him, but I am concerned that correct information be portrayed to parents.
I love the Dr. Sears books and I credit his books with helping me to become anti-circ. I read his parts on circ while pregnant with my daughter and she wouldn't have been circ'ed had she been a boy. I'm so thankful that even though Dr. Sears is clearly not 100% anti-circ, he does a reasonably good job of helping people see that it is unnecessary.
I am concerned however, about some of the misleading information found in the parts of his books that I read. Specifically what comes to mind is his statement that 90% of boys are retractable by age 3.
Does anybody know if some of his more recent books have more updated information? If they don't, would it be wise to contact him? How would it be best to go about it? Like I said, I really like his books and I'm not trying to bash him, but I am concerned that correct information be portrayed to parents.
