I was just thinking...
The "mainstream" expects parents to treat their children a certain way. This popular way we are expected to treat our children is much less kind then what would be acceptable for a stranger to treat our child. It's much less kind then we hope their friends will treat them. It's much less kind then we would treat a strangers child, and much less kind then we hope for them to treat others.
What happens if that ended up being true? Imagine if our children's friends treated our children the way we hope they would. If our children's teachers all treated them the way we hope. If all strangers were all kinder and more gentle minded towards our children. And imagine if all this were true while following the mainstream parenting suggestions : overbearing control over the child, scolding, punishing, etc.
Who would our children feel most safe with then? who would they trust? Should we then be surprised when our child seeks guidance from a friend instead of ourselves?
I just wonder if its connected. Children wanting to fit in however they can with whoever will be kind to them. Not speaking of the parents here, as we obviously have different goals then the mainstream - but where does a parent expect a child to turn when making decisions - towards someone who is kind to them, or someone whose "job" (parent) it is to be harder on them then anyone else they will ever meet in life (as a ideal, however faulty it may be).
They hit their children - but would not want their child's best friend to hit them. They yell at their child - but would expect a babysitter, daycare provider, or school teacher to speak to their child with more respect then that. They would not be okay with their teen's boyfriend/girlfriend if he/she stood around yelling and scolding her/him. So when those ideals are met - those people ARE being kind to their children - what does that result in? Where does that child place their trust? In the parent whose "job" it is to hurt them and do things that would be considered unkind if done to them by a friend/teacher/spouse/stranger? Or will they turn to the person who is kind and respectful towards them, even if the advice that person is giving isn't truly in their best interest - because perhaps they find it easier to trust the person being kind to them DOES have their best interest at hand?
Is there a benefit to being a parent who is the most gentle, compassionate, understanding, unconditionally loving, forgiving person in their life? That when they are curious about something and we share our opinions they will value it because they know we would not hurt them, and they have known this longer then they have known any other person?
Okay, I'm done with my senseless rambling now
The "mainstream" expects parents to treat their children a certain way. This popular way we are expected to treat our children is much less kind then what would be acceptable for a stranger to treat our child. It's much less kind then we hope their friends will treat them. It's much less kind then we would treat a strangers child, and much less kind then we hope for them to treat others.
What happens if that ended up being true? Imagine if our children's friends treated our children the way we hope they would. If our children's teachers all treated them the way we hope. If all strangers were all kinder and more gentle minded towards our children. And imagine if all this were true while following the mainstream parenting suggestions : overbearing control over the child, scolding, punishing, etc.
Who would our children feel most safe with then? who would they trust? Should we then be surprised when our child seeks guidance from a friend instead of ourselves?
I just wonder if its connected. Children wanting to fit in however they can with whoever will be kind to them. Not speaking of the parents here, as we obviously have different goals then the mainstream - but where does a parent expect a child to turn when making decisions - towards someone who is kind to them, or someone whose "job" (parent) it is to be harder on them then anyone else they will ever meet in life (as a ideal, however faulty it may be).
They hit their children - but would not want their child's best friend to hit them. They yell at their child - but would expect a babysitter, daycare provider, or school teacher to speak to their child with more respect then that. They would not be okay with their teen's boyfriend/girlfriend if he/she stood around yelling and scolding her/him. So when those ideals are met - those people ARE being kind to their children - what does that result in? Where does that child place their trust? In the parent whose "job" it is to hurt them and do things that would be considered unkind if done to them by a friend/teacher/spouse/stranger? Or will they turn to the person who is kind and respectful towards them, even if the advice that person is giving isn't truly in their best interest - because perhaps they find it easier to trust the person being kind to them DOES have their best interest at hand?
Is there a benefit to being a parent who is the most gentle, compassionate, understanding, unconditionally loving, forgiving person in their life? That when they are curious about something and we share our opinions they will value it because they know we would not hurt them, and they have known this longer then they have known any other person?
Okay, I'm done with my senseless rambling now











Yes it is rude but you child is showing something to you in school most of the time it is their picture on the wall or a friend of theirs