I have a question the other night I was watching the documentary "Business of Being Born." It's about how its healthier to give a home birth or birth with a midwife than go to the hospital, where there is too much intervention. It was a good documentary produced by Ricki Lake. Why I watched? Bored want to know a little of everything than a lot of one thing and nothing else.
Anyway the question. What is the ratio between between families having home births and choosing to still circumcised, and whats the ration of them choosing not to circumcised? Is there a correlation? Is it typical to not circumcised if they gave a home birth? And are most Doulas and Midwives against circumcision?
Sorry for all the questions but I thought about these as the documentary went on.
Anyway the question. What is the ratio between between families having home births and choosing to still circumcised, and whats the ration of them choosing not to circumcised? Is there a correlation? Is it typical to not circumcised if they gave a home birth? And are most Doulas and Midwives against circumcision?
Sorry for all the questions but I thought about these as the documentary went on.








:



