Quote:
Originally Posted by
Avriel86Â

Joybird, I also have tri-quench and have been unsure of how to properly "cut" the liquid drops for my kids. Â Do you have a reputable source that gave you the info?? Â Maybe it's too late for us to start it now...but better late than never I'm kind of thinking? I don't know... I'm not sure who to trust with the radiation information (I'm also in Washington). I have been looking at the EPA readouts in my area and while they have been basically the same before and after the quake, it doesnt make sense as to why all of a sudden they are finding radiation in milk. Â I have considered the fact that in Spokane there is a high occurrence of radon in the soil so that may have been having an impact all along but its never been looked at/reported? It's so confusing.
I am adding 24 drops of water for each drop of tri-quench and then using each drop of that mixture as 1mg (since 1 drop of tri-quench has 25mg). Â So I give little dd 3 drops, big dd 6 drops, adults 13 drops. Â This was my idea and I was feeling like it was probably not calibrated very accurately because my dropper is likely a different size dropper than the tri-quench bottle. Â So I went to my compounding pharmacy and the woman there did the math for me a bit differently using standard household measurements like this:
Â
2 drop tri-quench into 2 cups water. Â From that use
Â
1 oz for baby (providing 3mg iodine)
Â
2 oz for older dd (providing 6mg iodine)
Â
4 oz for each adult (providing 13mg iodine)
Â
Both she and my doctor said that the dropper method is fine as well though, which I've still been using because I don't have a 1oz measurement and by giving drops I can make sure that they're getting it all. Â I am still unsure about the numbers after all that though, because the bottle says 19mg iodine from 25mg potassium iodide. Â I used the larger number to divide by because these these are fairly high dosages to begin with and we are eating lots of kelp/seaweed so I figure I'd rather give them a bit too little than a bit too much. Â Â
Â
The information we are being given is very confusing. Â The numbers don't seem to change because they are measuring all radiation (rays and particles). Â The particular isotope iodine-131 is not usually present at all though. Â And they keep upping their opinions about what we will expect and even how much is safe. Â First they said we would not see any change in levels, then they say we will see a tiny increase that is barely measurable, then they say okay it is in the food supply, but not enough to harm anyone. Â We all know that there is no 'safe' level of exposure to radiation, this is not a debated issue and it is taken as fact in science and medicine. Â The levels they set are a calculated risk, that's all. Â And when you hear a comparison between ingested/inhaled particles and 'background' radiation or x-rays, be suspicious. Â They are ignoring the fact that when we consume particles, they lodge in our bodies and become 'internal emitters', giving off radiation to all the nearby cells for as long as they are in the body. Â When you get an x-ray or fly in an airplane, the radiation you are exposed to stops. Â There is a whole slew of scientific and medical literature describing this phenomenon and people are being misled about the actual dangers of constant low-level radiation, which is what happens with internal emitters. Â There is an excellent segment on Democracy Now from this week that explains it better. Â
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/3/30/prescription_for_survival_a_debate_on
Â
About the milk, radiation contamination (like most toxins) multiplies x1000 each time it is moved up a notch in the food chain. Â That's why its so much higher in the milk than in grass that the cows ate. Â So, the kids living near Chernobyl were poisoned by milk on a way higher scale than by vegetables or fruit. Â Which leads me to question, exactly how contaminated is my own milk?? Â I eat food grown from the same land that the cows eat from....
Â
Â