Mothering › Mothering Discussion Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › What if new moms had to sign a waiver?
New Posts  All Forums:
 

What if new moms had to sign a waiver? - Page 12

post #221 of 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLoud View Post
Here's an idea: what if every hospital maternity ward asked every new mother: "Do you want to breastfeed, or would you rather we feed your baby formula? The choice is up to you." Then if the mom said, "Feed my baby formula," the hospital would say, "Sure. Here are some free samples. You just have to sign this waiver first." The waiver would go something like this:

I am aware that by choosing to feed my baby formula instead of breastmilk, I am increasing his risk of dying of SIDS, lowering his IQ, increasing his risk of contracting diseases in infancy, increasing the severity of those diseases, increasing his risk of diseases in adulthood, increasing his risk of allergies...[We'll have to work on the exact wording here, since there are just so many risks to formula feeding, we have to pick and choose lest the waiver be too long.] I am also aware that by not breastfeeding, I am increasing my own risks of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, uterine cancer, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and obesity.

If my baby or I becomes sick or dies as a result of this hospital feeding my baby formula, I will not sue this hospital.

Signed: Date:

Psychology studies have shown that people will make the right choice when it's the default, and making the wrong choice requires checking a box. If people realize that breastfeeding is the normal thing, and formula is dangerous enough to require a waiver, they might be more likely to make the right choice.
This is absolutely ridiculous! New Moms have enough to worry about. They needn't be bothered with idle threats and guilt.
post #222 of 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by nudhistbudhist View Post
What if a mom who DIDN'T KNOW about those risks because no one ever mentioned it.
Maybe it would make more sense to make information on this part of the standard prenatal care, then.

I will say that, of the women I've personally known who have ff by choice, none of them were unaware that breastmilk was better for their babies. The reasons for their choice to ff were varied, but they all knew that it was nutritionally subpar, and the ones I've talked to about it also knew that breastmilk offers immune benefits, as well.
post #223 of 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by pumpkinhead View Post
That was exactly my point . We have lost a generation of breastfeeding experience. Many of us do not have mothers who breastfed us. We don't know what it normal and what isn't because they don't. We have very little experience to draw on, hence the lack of support.
Gotcha. I wasn't sure what you were getting at but I understand now
post #224 of 225
I have removed several posts. As I addressed earlier in the thread, the purpose of this forum is breastfeeding activism. We WILL NOT host threads saying breastfeeding advocacy is "nobody's business". Period. If you disagree with the concept of Lactivism, please just don't post or read here.
post #225 of 225
Thread closed to new posts.
New Posts  All Forums:
 
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Lactivism
Mothering › Mothering Discussion Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › What if new moms had to sign a waiver?