Quote:
| I also think historical movies are fine. But, once you make a little catchy, enjoyable song about killing Indians ... (to me at least) it seems to cross the line. There must be a better way to portray historical movies without having the "bad guys" sing songs like that. It's like making a catchy song about WWII, and rounding up people into concentration camps. Songs like that almost make light of what happened. The beat is fun, positive, catchy ... and the subject matter - yikes! Some things just don't go well with cute, Disney songs. |
Hmm.... yeah, I see your point... maybe I just didn't find that song catchy.

I haven't watched the film more than a few times, but I know the words to "Just Around the River Bend" and "Colours of the Wind" and even "If I Never Knew You", whereas I couldn't sing that song if you paid me. I'd be very surprised if a kid found it interesting/memorable enough to sing. Now, "Be Prepared", on the other hand, I've belted out many a time from the shower!
The histirical inaccuracy's a fair point, and put me off the movie for years. Then when I finally did grudgingly admit the artwork was gorgeous, I saw the sequel in which they made some vague attempt to be historically "accurate", and had Pocahontas marry the other guy. Then that
really made me mad, because it totally ruined the "I'll always be with you" schtick of the first film, which seemed pretty cynical for a Disney film.

I mean, if you're going to abandon accuracy for a love story, at least keep the beauty and purity of the love story intact, you know? Plus, Disney sequels always appal me for the decline in the quality of the artwork. TLM2 shows Ariel jerking around the sea as if her tail's on a hinge; Aladdin 2's Jasmine can't walk properly, and Pocahontas in the second film just looked ugly. It's a shame... anyway, digression.
Yes, Jasmine was ridiculously skinny. And had eyes the size of saucers. I always liked Cinderella - very graceful but far more realistic, and with good sturdy ankles.
