I think any questioning of the propriety of taking an infant's choice automatically makes the case against circumcision. If there's one person who's protesting, who's to say that the child whose genitals are in jeopardy wouldn't grow up to feel the same way? The possibility lends credence to the default choice being the undoable one (intactness).
The fact that hundreds of thousands of men are restoring their foreskins makes a compelling case, as does the annual protest at Washington, DC.
Intactivists marching in parades must make many people silently question. BTW, are we all subscribed to the Activism section of MDC so we'd be notified of such a march in our area? I just remembered today to subscribe.
Cheers,
-Ron
The fact that hundreds of thousands of men are restoring their foreskins makes a compelling case, as does the annual protest at Washington, DC.
Intactivists marching in parades must make many people silently question. BTW, are we all subscribed to the Activism section of MDC so we'd be notified of such a march in our area? I just remembered today to subscribe.
Cheers,
-Ron
