The excellent David Wilton outlines the situation here:
http://www.circumcisionandhiv.com/20...h-reasons.html
To summarise:
This is an article in British weekly newspaper The Observer shamelessly promoting circumcision, after presenting an entirely biased & one-sided case of the medical evidence: http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandsty...ealth-children
This is the email address of Renton's immediate boss: lifeandstyle.editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk
This is the email address for people who want to submit letters for publication & the editor's attention: letters@observer.co.uk
This is the email address for reporting the (many) factual innaccuracies in Renton's article (they have a regular column for erratas): reader@observer.co.uk
This is the Observer's switchboard number: +44 (0)20 3353 2000
http://www.circumcisionandhiv.com/20...h-reasons.html
To summarise:
This is an article in British weekly newspaper The Observer shamelessly promoting circumcision, after presenting an entirely biased & one-sided case of the medical evidence: http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandsty...ealth-children
This is the email address of Renton's immediate boss: lifeandstyle.editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk
This is the email address for people who want to submit letters for publication & the editor's attention: letters@observer.co.uk
This is the email address for reporting the (many) factual innaccuracies in Renton's article (they have a regular column for erratas): reader@observer.co.uk
This is the Observer's switchboard number: +44 (0)20 3353 2000






