This is what it looks like it's going to boil down to. After WWIII, dh said that he will NOT be "okay with" our ds remaining intact, and that it upsets him because he knows that *I* am the one who is going to ultimately "win," and he feels he has no say. He remains completely pro-circ, even though I've disputed all of his reasons with facts about why it's unnecessary. I've shown him research, the Penn and Teller video - the whole nine. It's his personal preference, because he feels it's "preventative" and "more cleanly" and no amount of research, data, etc can persuade him otherwise. It's boiled down to him saying that while he is 100% against it, he realizes that I have the final say and basically that he'll be very hurt and hold a grudge if I go knowingly against his wishes, because it's his son, too. However, my mind is made up and my son WILL remain intact.
Did anyone else have this disagreement? I hate thinking that my dh will feel as though I "betrayed" him, but at the same time, it's not something that I am willing to do to my son. I feel like it's between a rock and a hard place, and am just looking for advice of anyone who has btdt and how long it took to "blow over."
Did anyone else have this disagreement? I hate thinking that my dh will feel as though I "betrayed" him, but at the same time, it's not something that I am willing to do to my son. I feel like it's between a rock and a hard place, and am just looking for advice of anyone who has btdt and how long it took to "blow over."











:!
