Yeah, give it a try. I am just so amazed that your hospital births are so cheap! We paid well over $2,500 in co-pays with our hospital birth.
post #21 of 29
7/25/09 at 10:17pm
|
I get that. Totally. BUT I'm taking my husband's feelings into account (not saying you're not...just saying that my husband is a "what if" guy by nature and profession so you get where I'm coming from). My husband would get behind a hospital birth with having nobody touch or coach me...if they were in the room in case of emergency. IF my OB won't agree to that (find out next week at my appointment) *then* we'll talk midwife.
I have to say that it's really tough riding the line trying to compromise so we're both happy. |
|
I feel like, around here, going to a midwife is so cost inhibitive that it is only for those who either have a bunch of money to pay for PPO insurance that covers it, or for those who just have a bunch of extra money to pay out of pocket, that basically it's just something cool and alternative for people with money to do, but the rest of us have to suffer with the OB and hospital of our HMO's choosing because who can argue with a $100 copay for the hospital delivery and no copay for prenatal visits?
Not that I am not grateful for the good insurance that we have, but if the midwife only charged half of what she currently charges I would gladly pay for it and she would likely be able to help more women and make a better living. |
|
Depends where you are in Canada... the only way I could birth at home with a midwife where I live is by paying out of pocket.
|
|
...perhaps I should be more specific...I feel very blessed to live in British Columbia!
So sorry to hear that you all have to deal with this expense...it is something that never crossed my mind. cheers, charlene |
|
Somehow you hit the nail on the head and are still way off base. You're absolutely right, these women do have to make a living. True, if they charged less they would be able to have more patients, but at the same time, this would compromise the level of care that make them attractive in the first place. Home birth midwifes have to be very particular about how many patients they take. They don't have the luxury that many OBs and hospital attended births do in the area of back up if for whatever reason they can't attend the birth. Also, midwifes don't have the luxuries of nurses and other attendants to assist during labor, so they are present for a significantly higher amount of time during labor (if you want them to be). During my first labor, she was there 11 hours. Also midwife appointments are typically much longer than your typical OB, mine average an hour. I know my midwife doesn't take more than 4 women due in the same month in order to not compromise her level of care and avoid the possibility of more than one woman being in labor at the same time. So, since the cost of living is so varied in different areas, I'm sure in your area $3800 is the price point where midwifes are able to take the limited number of patients they can and still be able to survive. Note, I said 'survive.' I don't know if you know any midwifes personally, but most of them are not even close to living a life of luxury.
So, all of this to say, please don't blame midwifes but put the blame on a fundamentally flawed system that in addition to strategically denying women access to adequate birth choices, also prohibits more women from entering into the field. |



Follow Mothering