Mothering › Forums › Archives › Pregnancy Archives › August 2009 › is bloody show a given?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

is bloody show a given? - Page 2

post #21 of 25
I didn't have any bloody show with DS until I was 6-7cm and in heavy labor. My water was broken for me while I was pushing him out. So, my first indication of labor was crampy contrax that were really regular and 7 minutes apart.
post #22 of 25
At the births I've attended it has been pretty common for the show and/or ROM to occur closer to transition than the start of labour. I definitely wouldn't discount active labour in the absence of either.
post #23 of 25
With my first, my water broke, I was not in labor yet, no bloody show until after transition in the hospital.

With my second, my MW broke my water at 8 cm. No bloody show.

With my third, I was induced, my water broke at about 7 cm in the hospital.

This time, my contractions have been on and off for several days, I am crampy and just waiting for the contractions to get regular.



Good luck to you but water breaking and bloody show are not a given!

Take care
post #24 of 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Talula Fairie View Post
It's like twice as intense ime.
Yes.
post #25 of 25
with dd- mucus, loads of blood, a very messy labor, water broke only as baby was coming out.

with this ds- water semi broke like a trickling out for about 2 hours, and then it stopped, only a tiny bit of bloody show, what a great clean labor, water finished breaking as baby was coming out followed by tons of blood.

Why can't it be the same so you know what is coming?!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: August 2009
Mothering › Forums › Archives › Pregnancy Archives › August 2009 › is bloody show a given?