Someone tossed that argument out to me yesterday and I had no answer.
I'm completely not flaming CD'ers, not one iota.
Thoughts?
I'm completely not flaming CD'ers, not one iota.

Thoughts?
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!



|
That's such a hard comparison to make, because the truth is that it's two different types of impact, and how do you judge one against the other?
If we took it to the extreme -- we should all wear diapers because washing a bunch of dipes together definitely uses less water-per-pee than flushing. ![]() To me water is a relatively renewable resource, and there are many other ways to save it (planting with native/local vegetation instead of lawns would be a big one, collecting/reusing gray water, and at some point taking a long hard look at agriculture and other water-intensive industries). Whereas, a disposable diaper may take a hundred years to decompose. (I've heard figures of 7-8 years, but that assumed the dipe would be left in open air, not buried in a landfill.) And as PPs mentioned, are they taking into account how much water it takes to manufacture a sposie? |
|
I think when this argument is made the water used to create the disposable diaper (or g-diaper insert) is often forgotten about.
|
|
That's not really true right? Where I am the fresh water comes from reservoirs, which comes from snowpack and (to a smaller extent) rain, which is renewable, right? I don't remember the 5th grade science lesson but something about moisture in the air gathering up and forming clouds...
|