Well, first I want to again welcome you and I want to point out the fact that this thought has entered your mind is a big step. It take courage to independently rethink this issue when you're surrounded by the dogma that we are in the US. I'll will briefly touch on some of these but for fuller explanations, it would make sense to create a new thread. I also want to emphasize that you shouldn't read judgment or tone in this or other replies you get. I'll admit that many posters here can get passionate but it's only because we care. You've started to question the practice and we want to help you along. With that in mind:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokeMom 
Honestly, the only reasons we did were 1: we figured God would not command the Jews to do something that was harmful/nonbeneficial and
|
I can't speak much to the religious angle for a few reasons not the least of which is we are not really permitted to discuss religion. However, I might ask how many other components do you follow closely? Do you keep Kosher for instance. Leviticus 24:16 says
Quote:
| And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him: as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land, when he blasphemeth the name of the Lord, shall be put to death. |
Yet we don't stone people for this act.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokeMom 
2: we always heard it was hard to keep clean if you were uncirc and that UTIs and cancer were more common.
|
I am not surprised by this. It is a common misconception in the US that intact boys or men have hygiene difficulties. I want you to consider a few things. First, among developed industrialized nations, circumcision is rare outside the US. Second, circumcision only became common in the US around the time of WWII before that, most Americans also weren't circumcised. Third, the levels of personal hygiene and regular bathing we enjoy today were only achieved in the last 100 years or so (actually proabably less than that). Which means for most of human history we got by with far less bathing and circumcision was mostly unheard of.
The problem with using UTIs and cancer to support circumcision is that both occur at very low baselines. UTIs are very easily treatable with ABX and a recurrent UTI in boys is almost always the result of a congenital anomaly of the urinary track, not the foreskin. Cancer is even more rare than a UTI; male breast cancer is far more common. The
American Cancer Society does not believe that circumcision is a useful prophylactic for penile cancer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokeMom 
3: DH was circ...so they'd match.
|
Who was this important too? Really? I would wager that most of those posting here have circumcised husbands and intact boys. Hang around and read posts you'll see that the boys simply don't care. I know I didn't. Boys will always be different from their fathers and this is the least often noticed. I'll also point out that there are many posters who in addition to having circumcised husbands, circumcised at least one or more sons. And they report no problems between brothers with regard to that situation either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokeMom 
Looking back, I think none of those were good reasons. #2 would have been a good reason...if it had been TRUE... I wish we had done more research. I can not believe that myself and others make such a BIG decision without knowing much about it!! I am really ashamed of myself for not researching and for making that decision based on such little and false knowledge.
|
Ok, so perhaps I gave you too much information having seen that you already know that nothing in #2 is true. Don't beat yourself up too much over this. What is done is done and at this point you are in a position to do better the next time; that is the important thing. It is hard to get the straight facts on this issue most Drs. it seems feel out patients to figure out their opinion and then support the patient rather then giving them a straight answer. If you go in their predisposed to circumcise, it is not likely they'll try and convince you otherwise. It seems even Drs. that are against it will bite their tongue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokeMom 
At this point in time I think my conclusion is that it was not wrong to do, but just not the Best thing to do! If I could do it over again, I wouldn't circ. I don't think I'll look down upon anyone for circ'ing their sons, but I will from now on strongly encourage them to research and find out EVERYTHING there is to know first, before deciding. And if DH gets on board, we won't circ any more little boys born to us. Even if it means our boys won't "match".
|
Well, I think you're at the first stage, you've started to question it and that's a big step. I don't always look down on people who circumcise I think most get caught up in the cultural inertia much like you did. There is a need for people to learn somethings; most importantly is that there is no medical need to circumcise. Ignorance keeps this going so I hope you'll share this with others dialog is the best way to end the practice. If you are in a position to make this decision again we can help you convince your husband, don't worry we've been there and done that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokeMom 
P.S. I forgot to mention that we didn't actually have ds1 circ. He was born with hypospadias and he came out of me already looking circumcised! He had to have 2 surgeries to correct the hypospadias issue.
P.S.2 I just read a story from a nurse who says that they have to console a baby after circ so that he isn't taken back crying. And that sometimes it takes awhile. I DO remember thinking that it was sure taking them a long time to get Levi's circ done... and sure enough he was very peaceful and sleeping when he came back. 
|
I can't comment on two but I too have heard of some awful stories. Again, take time to read and learn more, ask any questions you want. We'll do our best to answer them and help you along this road.

Follow Mothering