Well, really it's not her, it's her husband who is inclined to have it done . . . because he is intact and wishes he wasn't!!!! If you can believe that. Apparently he finds the hygiene part a "pain the butt," but the main reason he wishes he was circ is because erections are painful for him, he gets tiny tears every time. They have to wait for 3 or 4 days in between each time they have sex. My friend thinks this is somehow tied into the fact that he is, um, well endowed, and there's not enough skin? Has anyone ever heard of this problem? I guess his inclination is to spare his son this problem, but I pointed out that it must be rare and that he should get it fixed if it's causing him that much pain, but there's no reason to hurt the baby because of his issue.
Any chance that not having enough foreskin (if that's what it is) is hereditary? Hoping that someone with more knowledge than me can shed some light on this.
Any chance that not having enough foreskin (if that's what it is) is hereditary? Hoping that someone with more knowledge than me can shed some light on this.







:

)
I don't know the exact problem, but like you describe with it hurting and tearing a little. I didn't think to ask specific questions because when they were talking about it around me, I didn't have an interest because I wasn't on these boards yet and already knew I wouldn't get it done. One brother (the most vocal about the issue) I know is very well endowed (DW says- I wouldn't actually know. ew) Even with that, DW is against circing, but I've heard first hand about the issue you're talking about.



Ya. That makes a lot of sense.