Mothering › Forums › Pregnancy and Birth › Birth and Beyond › Homebirth › Ascribing Motives to Homebirthing Mamas (Rant)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Ascribing Motives to Homebirthing Mamas (Rant)

post #1 of 14
Thread Starter 
I don't know about you, but I would for once like to see journalists and home birth critics stop and ask us why we choose home birth....and then actually listen to our response. Because so far, we've been grossly misrepresented:

* MSNBC reporters referred to it as "extreme birth," as if our motive is for pure bada$$ shock value. "Well, Matt, my hobbies include bungee jumping, home birthing, sky diving...."

* A person interviewed for the above story quoted doctors who believed we do it because we're "hedonistic" and want a "spa treatment." ("I'll take the spa package with the manicure, pedicure, facial, and 10-centimeter cervical dilation. Oh, and could you throw a baby in with that?") Or was I a "hedonist" for wanting pain relief in a birth tub instead of by way of an epidural needle?

*It also cited all of the celebrities having babies at home. "Well, Matt, I did it because Demi did it, and I'm just a slaaaaave to Hollywood trends."

*A number of online commenters posting in response to various home birth stories echo ACOG's portrayal of us as vile, selfish mommies who care more about our "birth experience" than our babies.

If you don't ask us why we home birth, you can artfully dodge what will inevitably be our responses. We do it for evidence-based care. We do it to avoid being coerced into the costly, unnecessary, and often evidence-free interventions that typify hospital "care." We do it because in light of all of this, we feel safer and more comfortable in our own homes.

But God forbid that anybody correctly represents us by mentioning these reasons. It might leak out to the public that hospitals are not always the best place for low-risk women to have a baby.... Nah. It's so much easier to portray us as shallow. Less thinking involved that way.

Thanks for allowing me to vent.
post #2 of 14
Well said, mama.
post #3 of 14
Well said!
This line about homebirths being a spa treatment is outrageous!!! Another example of ignorance and jumping to conclusions I'm sick of.
After a beautiful baby came out of my Safe homebirth I take offense with anyone who would imply my baby's safety was not my absolute #1 concern.Plus nobody wants to admit that epidurals,pitocin and frequent VE's might not be safe for BABIES!
post #4 of 14
post #5 of 14
Thank you.... I appreciate your rant. I couldn't have said it better myself (not that I say much on here, but I read most everything!)
post #6 of 14


Well said!
post #7 of 14
appreciating your rant. and nodding with every word.
post #8 of 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turquesa View Post
But God forbid that anybody correctly represents us by mentioning these reasons. It might leak out to the public that hospitals are not always the best place for low-risk women to have a baby.... Nah. It's so much easier to portray us as shallow. Less thinking involved that way.

Thanks for allowing me to vent.
By acknowledging our reasons, they would have to admit that the mainstream birthing path they chose and experienced (or their partners) may not have been the best for them or their baby, and that is too painful for any parent, mainstream or crunchy, to face easily, whether it is birth, circ, vaxing, co-sleeping, etc.

Few stories on this are very objective because the writers and producers are filtering the information from their own experiences. Andrew Goldman, who profiled Cara M. in NY magazine profiled the HB movement after finding out that they risked out of it. The piece was a classic attack on a group that couldn't include them to make themselves feel better.
post #9 of 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by xmasbaby7 View Post
By acknowledging our reasons, they would have to admit that the mainstream birthing path they chose and experienced (or their partners) may not have been the best for them or their baby, and that is too painful for any parent, mainstream or crunchy, to face easily, whether it is birth, circ, vaxing, co-sleeping, etc.
I couldn't agree more with this. I think this is one of the reasons birth reform is so hard in general...people don't want to admit that they have been victims of a system not designed in moms/babies' best interest, they prefer to think their own experience was just an unavoidable part of having a baby safely. Its the only way I can explain US women's attitide towards birthing after having lived and had a baby in another country -- the sort of wilful blindness to the huge amount of extra bullshit we are expected to put up with here just shocks me.

I totally agree with what OP said about the main reasons that women chose homebirth, but I also have to ask -- what is so wrong about women valuing their own experience of birth? Why is that a sinister motive? Why do we have this idea that what's good for mom is bad for the baby? In almost every case, evidence has shown that is not true- what makes mom comfortable and safe is what makes the baby safe. So this idea that as a mother you have to constantly crucify yourself and put up with painful and demeaning treatment that you don't necessary get to consent to because that MUST be best for the baby...its incorrect, incredibly destructive, and in my opinion, a HUGE tool for oppressing women. The fact that US OBs continue to use this line of reasoning to scare women is a huge reason why I won't see one unless its life or death situation.
post #10 of 14
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by xmasbaby7 View Post
B
Few stories on this are very objective because the writers and producers are filtering the information from their own experiences. Andrew Goldman, who profiled Cara M. in NY magazine profiled the HB movement after finding out that they risked out of it. The piece was a classic attack on a group that couldn't include them to make themselves feel better.
I did not know this about Andrew Goldman. But it makes sense. I find his style of reporting on this quite emotive, as if he had a personal vendetta.


Quote:
Originally Posted by stella.rose View Post
I totally agree with what OP said about the main reasons that women chose homebirth, but I also have to ask -- what is so wrong about women valuing their own experience of birth? Why is that a sinister motive? Why do we have this idea that what's good for mom is bad for the baby? In almost every case, evidence has shown that is not true- what makes mom comfortable and safe is what makes the baby safe. So this idea that as a mother you have to constantly crucify yourself and put up with painful and demeaning treatment that you don't necessary get to consent to because that MUST be best for the baby...its incorrect, incredibly destructive, and in my opinion, a HUGE tool for oppressing women. The fact that US OBs continue to use this line of reasoning to scare women is a huge reason why I won't see one unless its life or death situation.
Excellent point!!
post #11 of 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turquesa View Post
* MSNBC reporters referred to it as "extreme birth," as if our motive is for pure bada$$ shock value. "Well, Matt, my hobbies include bungee jumping, home birthing, sky diving...."
My favourite part of your rant! Love it!
post #12 of 14
post #13 of 14
Great post OP.
I have thought a lot about when they called the choice to homebirth a hedonistic spa treatment on the today show. All I could think was I know neither of these two men discussing birth have ever given birth but I've had natural childbirth and been to the spa and let me assure you they are not the same.
post #14 of 14
I guess my homebirth was like a spa in the sense that it was relaxing as opposed to hectic like my hospital birth. I had people there who knew how to behave around a birthing woman. In a hospital they would have been pushing for pit after my water had been broken for more than 24 hours with no baby. They probably would have freaked about the double nuchal cord too.

Even my (wonderful) MIL was very worried about her ability to handle being at the birth. She asked dh if she would need to drink before the birth. She had only experienced hospital births. (Though her younger brother was born at home when she was a toddler) After the birth she said the Midwives treated me like a queen and wondered aloud why all births weren't like that. She wrote our midwives a thank you letter.

If hospitals/OBs and the like think that homebirths are like spas then maybe they should start having that attitude towards their hospital births. Treat women with respect and use evidence based practices. If I could guarantee a supportive environment I would consider a hospital birth. But assembly line birth is not my cup of tea. Rules for the sake of hospital policy are not rules that I will choose to follow.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Homebirth
Mothering › Forums › Pregnancy and Birth › Birth and Beyond › Homebirth › Ascribing Motives to Homebirthing Mamas (Rant)