With the sacrifice of a lamb, obviously the lamb gives the ultimate sacrifice - of its very life.
But I think the sacrifice was also (or perhaps even primarily, from the viewpoint of humans, though certainly not from the lambs) on the part of the humans. If I understand it, the point of the sacrificial lamb was to offer it to God, and so humans would not partake of it. So the humans who made the sacrifice could not eat its meat or take its wool, etc. The value of the lamb was given to God.
So, Jesus offered Himself as the ultimate sacrifice and died for all of us. But I wonder if the analogy extends to the loss that humankind had when our Teacher left the earth. Of course his Word lives on - but, did humankind also sacrifice when He died?
But I think the sacrifice was also (or perhaps even primarily, from the viewpoint of humans, though certainly not from the lambs) on the part of the humans. If I understand it, the point of the sacrificial lamb was to offer it to God, and so humans would not partake of it. So the humans who made the sacrifice could not eat its meat or take its wool, etc. The value of the lamb was given to God.
So, Jesus offered Himself as the ultimate sacrifice and died for all of us. But I wonder if the analogy extends to the loss that humankind had when our Teacher left the earth. Of course his Word lives on - but, did humankind also sacrifice when He died?






