Mothering › Forums › Natural Family Living › Spirituality › Religious Studies › Episcopalian Mamas?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Episcopalian Mamas?

post #1 of 13
Thread Starter 
Hi, I'm exploring Episcopalianism -- and couldn't find any threads for Episcopalian mamas -- so I thought I'd start one here, for my own learning as well as everyone's fellowship.
post #2 of 13
It might be better off in Spirituality. You might also want to consider if you just want Episcopalians - The Episcopal Church (TEC)- or members of the Anglican Communion (AC)from other countries as well.

I think the threads for Episcopalians here before have been a bit lukewarm - it's hard to discuss hot-button issues without a lot of heat, and those are often what are on people's minds given the situation in the AC and especially TEC now.
post #3 of 13
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluegoat View Post
It might be better off in Spirituality. You might also want to consider if you just want Episcopalians - The Episcopal Church (TEC)- or members of the Anglican Communion (AC)from other countries as well.
Well, I guess I'm not knowledgeable enough to know if the other Anglican churches feel inclusive of the Episcopal Church right now but maybe it'd be good to open it up to all Anglicans. After all, we are in Religious Studies which is where debates can happen.

I just found a thread in Spirituality, where a mama seems to be wanting to get into a deeper discussion.

So I might see if they want to come over to this thread, or start an entirely different one. And whether they want to just make it Episcopal or all Anglicans. I'm open.

Quote:
I think the threads for Episcopalians here before have been a bit lukewarm - it's hard to discuss hot-button issues without a lot of heat, and those are often what are on people's minds given the situation in the AC and especially TEC now.
Yeah, I'm not sure if most Episcopalian mamas are interested in heated debates or not.
post #4 of 13
I'm an Episcopalian .

What kind of a thread are you looking for?
post #5 of 13
Thread Starter 
Well, one thing I'd love talking about is Mary. I'd actually started out researching the Roman Catholic Church, and I've fallen in love with Mary (though I don't agree with their idea that Mary remained a virgin even after her and our Savior was born -- I think she was a loving and giving wife to Joseph, and I don't think I'm demeaning her one bit by saying this).

I'm still just going Wow! at the realization that Mary's DNA is now part of God's DNA -- and she is the feminine face of God. I've also been learning a lot from G. Scott Sparrow's book "Blessed Among Women: Encounters with Mary and Her Message." He's the one I got "feminine face of God" from.

In short, I've been enjoying developing a relationship with Mary, and this has lately been very helpful in drawing me into a deeper level of forgiving people. And I love praying the Catholic Rosary.

But at the same time, I have some major issues with some major Catholic doctrines -- so in all honesty I can't become a Roman Catholic. But I've been reading that in the Episcopal Church, there's room for a wide range of individual beliefs.

I understand that maybe the majority of Episcopalians wouldn't pray the Hail Mary -- at least it's not listed as one of their suggested Rosary prayers. And I also realize that there may not be any Hail Mary's in the worship service. But at the same time, I'm thinking that Marian devotion isn't frowned upon there in the way that it would be in some Protestant churches.
post #6 of 13
I am a bit curious about the devotions to Mary. I remember the Hail Marys as a Catholic child, but most of my years were as a protestant..where that would definitely have been looked down upon.

Why pray to Mary? Why do some place such a significance on her when protestants do not?
post #7 of 13
Thread Starter 
Mary is significant because it is through her that God became human.

The Catholic idea of "To Christ, through Mary" acknowledges this.

I understand that the majority of Episcopalians may not see it like this. I don't need "everyone" I worship with to believe in praying the "Hail Mary." I'm happy to keep this as just part of my private devotions (though I admit I'd be thrilled to have fellowship with one or two people who could see where I was coming from).
post #8 of 13
Episcopalians, or Anglicans in general, have no problem with many of the Marian doctrines. Some pay more attention to them than others. You are more likley to find people that are interested in Mary in high church parishes.

Traditionally, Anglicans have subscribed to the perpetual virginity of Mary, though it isn't considered a matter necessary for salvation. It is very clearly though supported by Tradition.

Modern Anglicans are quite various - but, many have little understanding of Anglicanism. This is partly related to poor teaching of children, however, it is also because Anglicanism has been quite open to members of other Christian groups and does not always insist on much adult aducation. Many adults attend Anglican Churches having had little teaching in Anglican beliefs. So you have to be careful in understanding that although Anglicanism does not always have a definite view on everything, every view you get inside the church is not Anglican. Because of the way Anglicanism has been transmitted, it can be difficult to get a feel for how to judge the difference - it's not like the Catholic Church which has a lot of documents to support/explain each item of belief.
post #9 of 13
Thread Starter 
Thank you, Bluegoat!

Yes, I've read through the Episcopalian outline of beliefs from the Book of Common Prayer, so I realize it's not as detailed as the Roman Catholic Catechism. I read through the Episcopalian Catechism (outline) at one sitting, whereas I'm only a little ways into the Roman Catholic Catechism.

I should probably go ahead and keep working my way through the RC Catechism, and I also want to read The Theology of the Body. Because I've been learning powerful things through studying this and also through praying the Rosary and learning about Marian devotion.

Bluegoat, since you are Anglican, maybe you can clue me in on the reasoning for believing that Mary remained a virgin even after giving birth to the Savior. So far, just off the top of my head, the only reason I can come up with is the old view of sex as dirty and shameful.
post #10 of 13
Thank you for explaining. I really had never known much about Marion Devotion, but I find it quite interesting.
post #11 of 13
Thread Starter 
You're welcome! I'm pretty new to it myself.
post #12 of 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by mammal_mama View Post
Thank you, Bluegoat!

Yes, I've read through the Episcopalian outline of beliefs from the Book of Common Prayer, so I realize it's not as detailed as the Roman Catholic Catechism. I read through the Episcopalian Catechism (outline) at one sitting, whereas I'm only a little ways into the Roman Catholic Catechism.

I should probably go ahead and keep working my way through the RC Catechism, and I also want to read The Theology of the Body. Because I've been learning powerful things through studying this and also through praying the Rosary and learning about Marian devotion.

Bluegoat, since you are Anglican, maybe you can clue me in on the reasoning for believing that Mary remained a virgin even after giving birth to the Savior. So far, just off the top of my head, the only reason I can come up with is the old view of sex as dirty and shameful.
Well, it is essentially a matter of Tradition. Many would agree that it would not have been a problem if Mary had had a normal sexual relationship with Joseph so long as they were married. But from the earliest days of the Church it has been passed down that this was not in fact the case.

There is actually some question as to what the nature of the marriage was - many Orthodox will tell you that they were not married at all, that the arrangement was more like a betrothal or protective custody, which sometimes happened for various reasons. (And as a general rule the Orthodox Church has been the most conservative of all groups in maintaining Tradition intact.) The story is that Mary had consecrated her virginity to God, and that an arrangement had been made with Joseph to be her protector. He is usually pictured as a much older man. Marriage and betrothal were understood a bit differently then, normally a couple were betrothed for a period where their legal status was solid, but they were not supposed to be sexually active and the woman continued to live with her parents. When they began to live together, and presumably have sex, then they were married. So since Mary and Joseph would have been living together without having sex, I suppose either description would fit.

It is often the case that those coming from a Protestant background don't have much experience in thinking about the possibility of celibacy in marriage - they tend to quote Paul's little blurb on not staying apart and leave it at that, and so it makes the arrangement described between Mary and Joseph seem very strange. But there is a long history of this kind of celibacy in marriage for a variety of reasons. Some couples adopted this when they felt their child-bearing years were over, or if they did not want more children for some good reason. So even up past the middle ages, it was not unheard of by any means. What Paul said was tempered in a way by the dictates of the body - everyone knows that in some situations more kids are not a good idea, and until recently the only way to avoid reliably was not to have sex. So it was recognized that this was not impossible, or necessarily bad, and it affected their interpretation and understanding of marriage.

Why would Mary have decided to do this? Well, I suppose for the reasons anyone might, but I guess it would come down to the reasons we are all meant to act - for the greater glory of God.

So, I think the big question is what does Tradition mean in the Church? Tradition can be described as the sum of beliefs and teachings that has come down orally through time. It also includes those of the future, which make it a living thing, but it is understood as being in a sense unchangeable - it may be further teased out, the implications better understood, but not actually changed. (Unlike tradition.) It is considered to be vital to have Tradition in order to interpret Scripture accurately (I'm sure you have noticed every group has a way of interpreting scripture, there is no way around it.) The Church says that Tradition is the tool which is given to the Church to do this. In fact, Scripture is understood as the product of Tradition.

The different groups that are big on tradition are the Orthodox, Catholics, Anglicans, and to some extent the Lutherans. The Orthodox tend to be the most conservative in teasing it out and defining what constitutes a change. They have maintained quite a lot of Tradition that the West doesn't. The Catholics are willing to go much farther, and perhaps on a related note put more emphasis on scripture and on the teachings of the magisterium. Anglicans have tended to be closer to this Western model (they have a slightly different idea which places scripture as the standard of what is necessary for salvation.), but have no magiserium and talk about reason instead. So like the Orthodox, for a long time a strong sense of Tradition kept them unified. However, they have recently (beginning in earnest since the 1940's) in NA especially really let up the floodgates on understanding Tradition which has caused a lot of the difficulties the Anglican Communion has now. So we see some groups turning more to Scripture and a kind of fundamentalism. Others follow reason unfettered by Tradition, which very easily becomes whatever the fad of the times is.

So it is fair to say, I think, that the Anglican communions difficulties relate to a crisis of Tradition, as well as a crisis concerning the nature of Scripture which became prominent at the beginning of the 20th century.
post #13 of 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Savoir Faire View Post
I am a bit curious about the devotions to Mary. I remember the Hail Marys as a Catholic child, but most of my years were as a protestant..where that would definitely have been looked down upon.

Why pray to Mary? Why do some place such a significance on her when protestants do not?
Jesus' first miracle (wedding feast of turning water to wine) was done at the request of His mother. Protestants regularly ask people to pray for them, some Christians (Anglicans, Catholics and Orthodox) also ask people who are now saints in heaven to pray for us as well. And sometimes it is very nice to go to our Mother and ask her to pray for us and ask her to intercede with her son on our behalf. Jesus clearly listened to His mother in the Biblical account and I can't see why it would be hard to believe that He would continue to do so now.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Religious Studies
Mothering › Forums › Natural Family Living › Spirituality › Religious Studies › Episcopalian Mamas?