Not on that particular article on ********* but there is another one that says how can you really be sure that the rabies deaths were actually rabies---what if it was tetanus? Here is that article http://www.*********/v/ruesch.html Like how people assumed that people died from polio before the vaccine was invented (and not DDT poisoning or what ever other cause) but then after the polio vaccine was invented of course according to them people still dying could not have died from polio, it must have been meningitis or something else as the cause of death.
Weston A. Price Foundation comments on this http://www.westonaprice.org/envtoxin...es_polio.html:
Basically that article is saying that polio and rabies aren't caused by a virus out in wild nature---they only caused those disease when injected in a laboratory.
Weston A. Price Foundation comments on this http://www.westonaprice.org/envtoxin...es_polio.html:
Quote:
| The injection of purée of diseased brain tissue into the brains of dogs was the method preferred by Louis Pasteur to establish virus causation with rabies, another CNS disease. A recent, definitive biography of Pasteur finds him to be a most important publicist for germ theory, a crucial promoter for the notion that rabies is caused by a virus. Unfortunately, his rabies experiments were biased and unsupported by independent studies. |





have you ever heard of anyone else serviving? I know I havn't, thats why I remembered it.
Follow Mothering