Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › NY magazine-I am disappointed but it is not all bad...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

NY magazine-I am disappointed but it is not all bad...

post #1 of 5
10/20/09 at 12:18pm
Thread Starter 
http://nymag.com/health/features/60158/
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 5
10/21/09 at 12:23am
I know I'm likely to get re-banned for this, but:
http://nymag.com/health/features/60146/

"Public health menace"?
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH!
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 5
10/22/09 at 1:25am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minarai View Post
I know I'm likely to get re-banned for this, but:
http://nymag.com/health/features/60146/

"Public health menace"?
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH!
It's written by Hanna Rosin, who is RABIDLY pro-circ. It's almost like she gets a kick out of saying outlandish things in support of circumcision.
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 5
10/22/09 at 1:26am
This whole feature was extremely disappointing. Article for article, it regurgitated pro-circumcision "data" and relegated the opposing argument to "emotional" reasons. And this is called "objective" journalism?
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 5
10/23/09 at 8:08am
The article on the history wasn't too bad.

In the Case against the Case against she attributes a quote to "Australian physicians" whoever that is. I'm from Australia and it certainly doesn't look it came from any medical body here.

I would love to know where she copied the text from.

It might have come from Brian Morris, who is not a medical doctor.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Case Against Circumcision
Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › NY magazine-I am disappointed but it is not all bad...